Einstein mistake is found

joinfree

Well-Known Member
Nov 3, 2016
1,009
191
87
EU
✟36,708.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Hello, friends, in the file is shown, that body, while falling into Black Hole vanishes without ever reaching central singularity. Or what ever singularity: singular state inside body is reached without outside singularity! It can't be. Mistake of Einstein? Who wonna be my science supervisor?

 

Attachments

  • paperDMandDE.pdf
    102 KB · Views: 5
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: devin553344

devin553344

I believe in the Resurrection
Nov 10, 2015
3,607
2,249
Unkown
✟93,810.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
Hello, friends, in the file is shown, that body, while falling into Black Hole vanishes without ever reaching central singularity. Or what ever singularity: singular state inside body without outside singularity! It can't be. Mistake of Einstein? Who wonna be my science supervisor?

Black holes don't have a singularity. They have a surface. If you fell into a black hole you would be super accelerated to smash against its surface. If you weren't torn apart by gravitational forces. Same with a singularity.

But you should know that your paper is plagiarized per the fake title to a real scientific paper.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: joinfree
Upvote 0

joinfree

Well-Known Member
Nov 3, 2016
1,009
191
87
EU
✟36,708.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Black holes don't have a singularity. They have a surface. If you fell into a black hole you would be super accelerated to smash against its surface. If you weren't torn apart by gravitational forces. Same with a singularity.

But you should know that your paper is plagiarized per the fake title to a real scientific paper.
Naked singularity has "Einstein mistake" also.
 
Upvote 0

devin553344

I believe in the Resurrection
Nov 10, 2015
3,607
2,249
Unkown
✟93,810.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
Naked singularity has "Einstein mistake" also.

To make meaningful conversation I would say: The current idea I think is that singularities would not exist at all, but rather Hawking radiation would dissipate a black hole. They're currently looking for micro black holes which would emit bursts of Hawking radiation. The smaller the black hole the more rapid it dissipates, such that large black holes (if I'm not mistaken) would never shrink into singularities.

And that means that black holes are revealing.
 
Upvote 0

SkyWriting

The Librarian
Site Supporter
Jan 10, 2010
37,279
8,500
Milwaukee
✟410,948.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Hello, friends, in the file is shown, that body, while falling into Black Hole vanishes without ever reaching central singularity. Or what ever singularity: singular state inside body is reached without outside singularity! It can't be. Mistake of Einstein? Who wonna be my science supervisor?

In the next life, we will be able to explore black holes thoroughly, not being influenced by gravity. We will be amazed at the time we've spent on issues that are not important.
 
  • Friendly
Reactions: joinfree
Upvote 0

timewerx

the village i--o--t--
Aug 31, 2012
15,263
5,898
✟299,055.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Single
There is much more to black holes than we imagine.

All the mass in our Universe would create a black hole with an "event horizon" having a radius roughly equivalent to the estimated size of our Universe!

If true, it would also mean, the Universe we know is actually the interior of a very very large black hole. Our Universe is one giant black hole and we're all in it!! Hello Black Hole neighbors!!

There are some scientists who do thinks that a "mini big bang" immediately follows the formation of a blackhole and no "singularity" ever forms. Of course we don't observe this event since the events all happen within the Event Horizon, completely unobservable.

Of course, these scientists never said anything about "mini universes" exists inside blackholes in the same sentence at the risk of being called crazy and jeopardizing their careers! ;)
 
Upvote 0

SkyWriting

The Librarian
Site Supporter
Jan 10, 2010
37,279
8,500
Milwaukee
✟410,948.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
There is another interesting idea that the surface of a black hole is 2 dimensional and contains all the information of the cosmos around it. So essentially our Cosmos is a holographic projection based on the information found on the surface of a black hole.
 
Upvote 0

joinfree

Well-Known Member
Nov 3, 2016
1,009
191
87
EU
✟36,708.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
To make meaningful conversation I would say: The current idea I think is that singularities would not exist at all, but rather Hawking radiation would dissipate a black hole. They're currently looking for micro black holes which would emit bursts of Hawking radiation. The smaller the black hole the more rapid it dissipates, such that large black holes (if I'm not mistaken) would never shrink into singularities.

And that means that black holes are revealing.
Dark Matter is healer for the naked singularity. Hereby the spacetime is continious and Schwarzschild type, but near the singularity is smooth correction, which removes the infinities. Care to be my supervisor? I need my PhD.
 
Upvote 0

joinfree

Well-Known Member
Nov 3, 2016
1,009
191
87
EU
✟36,708.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
There is another interesting idea that the surface of a black hole is 2 dimensional and contains all the information of the cosmos around it. So essentially our Cosmos is a holographic projection based on the information found on the surface of a black hole.
You better read the file, there is following text:

In addition, neither the holographic principle nor the Firewall nor the Hawking radiation stop us to get below the event horizon. “We present a simple model for stellar collapse and evaluate the quantum mechanical stress-energy tensor to argue that quantum effects do not play an important role for the collapse of astrophysical objects.” [25].
[25] Bruno Arderucio-Costa, William Unruh, “Model for Quantum Effects in Stellar Collapse”, Phys. Rev. D 97, 024005 (2018).
 
Upvote 0

SkyWriting

The Librarian
Site Supporter
Jan 10, 2010
37,279
8,500
Milwaukee
✟410,948.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
You better read the file, there is following text:

In addition, neither the holographic principle nor the Firewall nor the Hawking radiation stop us to get below the event horizon. “We present a simple model for stellar collapse and evaluate the quantum mechanical stress-energy tensor to argue that quantum effects do not play an important role for the collapse of astrophysical objects.” [25].
[25] Bruno Arderucio-Costa, William Unruh, “Model for Quantum Effects in Stellar Collapse”, Phys. Rev. D 97, 024005 (2018).

I did read the file.

Journal Search
Search term: Dmitri Martila

The following Author was not found in PMC: Dmitri Martila[All Fields].
No items found.

Semantic Scholar
Search 42,156,200+ papers from ArXiv, PubMed, and more…

Full text PDF available (13) for Dmitri Martila - Semantic Scholar
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: joinfree
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

joinfree

Well-Known Member
Nov 3, 2016
1,009
191
87
EU
✟36,708.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Upvote 0

SkyWriting

The Librarian
Site Supporter
Jan 10, 2010
37,279
8,500
Milwaukee
✟410,948.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Am I non-existing like satan?
CV: Dmitri Martila
1. God of Existence is source of existing ones.
2. The satan has not come from God.

Satan was the leader of God's fallen angels.
God is responsible for everything.
There is no other source for stuff. (layman's terms)
 
Upvote 0

joinfree

Well-Known Member
Nov 3, 2016
1,009
191
87
EU
✟36,708.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Satan was the leader of God's fallen angels.
God is responsible for everything.
There is no other source for stuff. (layman's terms)
God is not evil. The satan is evil. God is good. So, the Lucifer has lost own existence.

 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Strathos

No one important
Dec 11, 2012
12,663
6,531
God's Earth
✟263,276.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Dark Matter is healer for the naked singularity. Hereby the spacetime is continious and Schwarzschild type, but near the singularity is smooth correction, which removes the infinities. Care to be my supervisor? I need my PhD.

Don't mention dark matter, you'll attract the EU brigade.
 
Upvote 0

SkyWriting

The Librarian
Site Supporter
Jan 10, 2010
37,279
8,500
Milwaukee
✟410,948.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
God is not evil. The satan is evil. God is good. So, the Lucifer has lost own existence.

You can't have voluntary communion involuntarily.
So the option not to commune with God is a good
option to have, even if it creates evil results.
Satan is from God, though not of God.

Genesis 50:20
As for you, you meant evil against me, but God meant it for good, to bring it about that many people should be kept alive, as they are today.
 
Upvote 0

timewerx

the village i--o--t--
Aug 31, 2012
15,263
5,898
✟299,055.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Single
That our Universe is a very big black hole article:

Are We Living in a Black Hole?

And why our Universe has not yet collapsed in a singularity is explained here:

Our universe resides in the center of a black hole, this theory claims

Black holes are generally produced by stars that are spinning. Like a skater pulling her arms in a spin, a star collapsing into a black hole spins at ever faster speed.

Rotational speed could approach the speed of light and in a very small radius, that's enormous centrifugal force (pardon my layman's term) that may be sufficient to counteract gravity, (not to mention other forces that may contribute to counteracting gravity). Which is why some scientists believe why singularities would not form.

And in the case of Universe, would be necessary to allow for evolution of matter or even life / living entities inside the black hole.
 
Upvote 0

FrumiousBandersnatch

Well-Known Member
Mar 20, 2009
15,258
8,056
✟326,229.00
Faith
Atheist
Black holes don't have a singularity. They have a surface. If you fell into a black hole you would be super accelerated to smash against its surface. If you weren't torn apart by gravitational forces. Same with a singularity.
Under General Relativity, black holes inevitably have a singularity - once inside the event horizon, the singularity is the future of all trajectories. But a BH singularity is an unknown, a state where GR breaks down, i.e. cannot describe that state.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

devin553344

I believe in the Resurrection
Nov 10, 2015
3,607
2,249
Unkown
✟93,810.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
That our Universe is a very big black hole article:

Are We Living in a Black Hole?

And why our Universe has not yet collapsed in a singularity is explained here:

Our universe resides in the center of a black hole, this theory claims

Black holes are generally produced by stars that are spinning. Like a skater pulling her arms in a spin, a star collapsing into a black hole spins at ever faster speed.

Rotational speed could approach the speed of light and in a very small radius, that's enormous centrifugal force (pardon my layman's term) that may be sufficient to counteract gravity, (not to mention other forces that may contribute to counteracting gravity). Which is why some scientists believe why singularities would not form.

And in the case of Universe, would be necessary to allow for evolution of matter or even life / living entities inside the black hole.

I created a theory about that. There are others that believe we are living in a black hole too: Black hole cosmology - Wikipedia
 
  • Like
Reactions: timewerx
Upvote 0