So you can't answer either of those questions?
Why would I ask questions if I already have the answers?
You said the subject was not about gods, but ID, and I asked you to give me an example of an intelligent designer, I mean if it's not God what is it? if it is God, of course the thread is about God or at the very least it's not taboo to mention him in the discussion.
ID proponents insist that the "d" does not necessarily refer to a god.
According to them, ID is just a model that allows for detecting design, any design. "design" as opposed to natural origins.
My question is about that so-called theory. How does it work? How does it help detecting design? What is the methodology?
Can you "demonstrate" your take of what your asking of us, or why it wasn't ID, or whatever you claim it is? Or are you going to claim the usual "irrelevant" cop out? It's just as fair a question as you pose in the OP.
I think my question is clear enough.
ID proponents say that ID is a proper scientific theory that enables them to detect design when design is present.
I'm just asking how that works.
Again, what do you not understand about my question?
And BTW, who claimed they could detect design in objects? I've never once seen that claim until you said it existed.
Huh?????
It seems you are like completely unaware of what ID theory supposedly is according to the people that developed this (people like Dembski, Behe, etc).
It would surely explain why you are having trouble with the topic.
Common sense tells me that if the object is even there and you or I are unable to produce it from nothing, let alone not have a clue how it came to be, then it had to be ID, or at least from someone much smarter than us. Sometimes "There is no other explanation" IS an explanation.
That's called an argument from ignorance.
So instead of constantly insisting on asking your silly so-called stumpers like some of you have a bad habit of doing, why don't you come down to earth and try a some common sense/common sense questions? Or would that put you at a disadvantage?
Asking for a demonstration of what is supposed to be a scientific theory, is a "stumper"?
Owkay then.
I'm going to retract my previous comment to you.
It indeed seems as if you ARE done with this thread.
In fact, you don't even seem to realise what the thread is about. Eventhough I explained it over and over and over again.
Upvote
0