Your wall text is rather impenetrable.
But to focus on a few salient points, and to reiterate the above, we do not worship Our Lady. Somebody's inability (or unwillingness) to recognize that fact doesn't change the fact.
The Co-Redemptrix thing is technically true but it's a lot easier to misunderstand than it is to understand. The title refers to her role in the Incarnation. Without her assent, Our Lord would not have been born. She was not a womb with feet. She was an active participant in His Incarnation. She had a key, though minor, role in bringing redemption to the world.
As it turns out though, the Co-Redemptrix thing is not dogma. Pope John Paul II was probably the most Marian Pope in the last few centuries, possibly the most Marian ever. And if he wasn't quite willing to say that Our Lady as Co-Redemptrix is Church dogma, the odds of it ever becoming dogma seem pretty slim to me. This is speculative stuff and so Catholics are not bound to believe in it. They can if they want to though.
"Until"? Really, you're using that?
Our Lady's Immaculate Conception is bothersome to a lot of people. But it proceeds from a pretty sound chain of logic. The more I consider it, the more it makes perfect sense.
As to her Perpetual Virginity, the Early Church believed it. This includes people who were personally taught and trained by the apostles. Why do you think you know something more about her than they do?