Why is evolution taught in our schools?

[xianghua]

Because it is a penguin, not a robot.

and the difference is?....

 

[tas8831]

and the difference is?....

You tell me, genius:

ro·bot
/ˈrōˌbät,ˈrōbət/
noun
noun: robot; plural noun: robots

1. a machine capable of carrying out a complex series of actions automatically, especially one programmable by a computer.
   synonyms: automaton, android, golem; More
   informalbot, droid
   "robots can perform certain tasks that are considered hazardous for humans"
   • (especially in science fiction) a machine resembling a human being and able to replicate certain human movements and functions automatically.
     synonyms: automaton, android, golem; More
     informalbot, droid
     "robots can perform certain tasks that are considered hazardous for humans"
   • used to refer to a person who behaves in a mechanical or unemotional manner.
     "public servants are not expected to be mindless robots"

What - you are still claiming that humans are the Intelligent Designers of living things?

 

[xianghua]

1. a machine capable of carrying out a complex series of actions

so a robot need a designer by definition?

 

[tas8831]

so a robot need a designer by definition?

A robot penguin would just be a robot penguin.

Spare us the dopey hypothetical about a robot penguin that is 'identical' to a real one.

A robot penguin that is identical to a real penguin is still a robot.

Now - anything other than your repeated argument via analogy proving only that the best you can come up with is the claim that humans designed humans?

 

[Aman777]

Aman777 said: ↑
Sure it does, since it shows that when the flood reached a depth of 15 cubits, (22.5 feet) the mountains were covered. Scripture was speaking of a much smaller and flatter Earth than the present one.

But didn't you say this:

If the Ark arrived and found the Earth only 22.5 feet deep, was the ocean also only 22.5 feet deep (or less)?

No, since the Ark was still inside the firmament. When the canopy or windows on high or top of the firmament were opened, it rained for 40 days and nights and the bottom of the firmament sank into the Lake, releasing the 450 ft Ark onto the surface of the Lake. It's still there underneath 11k years of volcanic debris.

The Ark appeared upon the mountains of Ararat on the 150th day after the flood began Genesis 8:4. On the SAME 150th day after the flood began, the Ark was ABOVE the highest mountains on Adam's Earth. Genesis 7:20-24 IOW, both events happened on the same day, at the same time.

 

[Aman777]

whats your math?

There was but ONE Ark which brought Adam's descendants, with Human intelligence, to this planet of the common ancestor of apes.

 

[Aman777]

↑
Aman:>>1. That God created matter from energy as Einstein confirmed. Gen 1:1
Dogma:>>Not in the bible, only in your imagination

Heb 11:3 Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear.

Einstein learned that matter (things seen) are the opposite side of the Energy coin, (which is not seen.) Remember that Genesis 1 is the outline and the details are found throughout the Bible. EVERYthing in the Bible refers BACK to one of God's 7 Days.

Aman:>>2. That Adam was the common ancestor of all Humans. Gen 3:22
Dogma:>>which is scientifically demonstrably incorrect

False, since Adam's Earth, along with his remains, were "clean dissolved" in the flood. Isaiah 24:19 and ll Peter 3:6 Your "science" misclassified the sons of God (prehistoric people) as Humans (descendants of Adam)

Aman:>>3. That God put Adam's firmament/Heaven under water. Gen 1:6-7
Dogma:>>which is scientifically demonstrably incorrect

False, since you cannot go to the water of the Multiverse which contained Adam's world.

Aman>>4. That God did not put our Cosmos under water. Gen 2:4
Dogma:>>which is scientifically demonstrably incorrect

You've lost it since our Cosmos is NOT surrounded by water, as i posted. Learn to read. It does little good to post to those sleeping.

 

[Aman777]

7. That God created and brought forth from water every living creature Genesis 1:21 Scientists call it coming forth naturally or magically.

That's not what that verse says at all. Your inability of proper reading comprehension is acting up again.

It says in that verse that god created sea live.
It goes on to say that god created the birds in the sky as a seperate statement - these birds aren't created from water.
Then it goes on in verse Genesis 1:24

Gen 1:21 And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their kind, and every winged fowl after his kind: and God saw that it was good.

The verse doesn't mention sea life but correctly shows that fowl/birds came from water too. This AGREES with Science which shows that ALL living creatures descended from the last universal common ancestor who appeared in the WATER, 13.8 Billion years ago exactly as God told us in Genesis 1.

The creatures made from the dust of the ground by Jesus are the "common ancestors" shaped and molded by the Hands of Jesus. Like mankind, they were Temporary Beings and subject to Death. They are "His kinds" and those created eternally by the Trinity are "Their kinds".

Adam was made temporarily by Lord God/Jesus. Genesis 2:7
He was ALSO "created in God's Image" by God the Trinity. Genesis 1:27

 

[Aman777]

Aman777 said: ↑
That's descent with modification.

Which is evolution.

Derp.

IOW, Godless men changed the name and began teaching our children that it's a fact, while adding to the creating power of a man-made concept, which is impotent. Evolution has NO power to change Apes into Humans as later versions of "evolution" have falsely taught. Humans are first made so it is impossible that we could have descended from Apes. That's God's Truth in Genesis.

 

[Paul of Eugene OR]

The biggest lie ever forced taught to our innocent children is the ToE. It's not scientifically proven because it's a guess, based on facts, but still an assumption of the consensus of believers of evolution. Circular Reasoning is indicated. It contradicts History, Scripture and provides no process by which God's intelligence can be implanted in Apes. . . . .

The above declaration against evolution was posted by a human with a coccyx. Some humans even have, attached to the coccyx, the muscle for lifting the tail. Alas, the muscle cannot do anything and is missing in many of us. Nobody knows if they have it or not unless an autopsy gets done to settle that question, and who would bother?

That situation pretty much proves we are the result of evolution from a previous species that actually had a tail.

 

[Paul of Eugene OR]

Aman777 said: ↑
That's descent with modification.



IOW, Godless men changed the name and began teaching our children that it's a fact, while adding to the creating power of a man-made concept, which is impotent. Evolution has NO power to change Apes into Humans as later versions of "evolution" have falsely taught. Humans are first made so it is impossible that we could have descended from Apes. That's God's Truth in Genesis.

Another man who believes just saying stuff makes it so. However, like all of us, he has the muscles present that can wiggle the ears; an utterly useless set of muscles for us humans, but evidence of having descended from a previous species that could turn its ears towards sound to good effect.

 

[AV1611VET]

The above declaration against evolution was posted by a human with a coccyx. Some humans even have, attached to the coccyx, the muscle for lifting the tail. Alas, the muscle cannot do anything and is missing in many of us. Nobody knows if they have it or not unless an autopsy gets done to settle that question, and who would bother?

That situation pretty much proves we are the result of evolution from a previous species that actually had a tail.

Right.

And conjoined twins shows us that Janus is our common ancestor?

 

[Aman777]

The above declaration against evolution was posted by a human with a coccyx. Some humans even have, attached to the coccyx, the muscle for lifting the tail. Alas, the muscle cannot do anything and is missing in many of us. Nobody knows if they have it or not unless an autopsy gets done to settle that question, and who would bother?

That situation pretty much proves we are the result of evolution from a previous species that actually had a tail.

Could be since when Adam sinned, he lost his likeness as Jesus, and was found in the likeness of prehistoric people who descended from Water on the 5th Day, exactly as God told us in Genesis 1:21. My objection to the name evolution is with changing descent with modifications within kinds into a godless term.

Changing the name also gave evolutionists the power to CLAIM that Humans descended from the common ancestor of Apes, which is impossible, since Noah was the first Human (descendant of Adam) to step foot on the present Earth 11,000 years ago, according to History and Scripture. Odd man out is the false ToE.

 

[Aman777]

Another man who believes just saying stuff makes it so.

False accusation since I support what I write with the agreement of Scripture, science and history. Can you?

Scripturally, Adam was made the 3rd Day before the plants herbs and rain. Gen 2:4-7
Historically, The first Human farming began just sw of Lake Van, Turkey where the Ark arrived 11k years ago. Human civilization can be traced to it's arrival.
Scientifically, Mindless Nature does not and did not implant God's superior intelligence into Apes since it MUST be inherited from other Humans (descendants of Adam). Have evolutionists ever heard of the birds and the bees?

 

[Paul of Eugene OR]

False accusation since I support what I write with the agreement of Scripture, science and history. Can you?

Scripturally, Adam was made the 3rd Day before the plants herbs and rain. Gen 2:4-7
Historically, The first Human farming began just sw of Lake Van, Turkey where the Ark arrived 11k years ago. Human civilization can be traced to it's arrival.
Scientifically, Mindless Nature does not and did not implant God's superior intelligence into Apes since it MUST be inherited from other Humans (descendants of Adam). Have evolutionists ever heard of the birds and the bees?

Well, your writings are not in agreement with science; scientists assert humans arrived via evolution. Your writings are not in agreement with history; historians assert humans migrated from an african origin and have never endured a world wide flood. As for the Bible, there are many ways to interpret the Bible message and so I prefer to choose the interpretations consistent with reality.

 

[Paul of Eugene OR]

Right.

And conjoined twins shows us that Janus is our common ancestor?

Naah, that's just a developmental error. But you knew that.

 

[DogmaHunter]

and the difference is?....

You don't know the difference between a penguin and a robot, yet you feel qualified to discuss matters of biology?

That's just rich.

 

[DogmaHunter]

↑
Aman:>>1. That God created matter from energy as Einstein confirmed. Gen 1:1
Dogma:>>Not in the bible, only in your imagination

Heb 11:3 Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear.

So... nothing about energy and matter.

Einstein learned that matter (things seen) are the opposite side of the Energy coin, (which is not seen.) Remember that Genesis 1 is the outline and the details are found throughout the Bible. EVERYthing in the Bible refers BACK to one of God's 7 Days.

In your imagination only.

Aman:>>2. That Adam was the common ancestor of all Humans. Gen 3:22
Dogma:>>which is scientifically demonstrably incorrect

False, since Adam's Earth, along with his remains, were "

clean dissolved" in the flood. Isaiah 24:19 and ll Peter 3:6 Your "science" misclassified the sons of God (prehistoric people) as Humans (descendants of Adam)

There is nothing in our DNA that suggests the injection of alien DNA.
Nore is there anything in the bible that even hints towards your fantasies about it.

Aman:>>3. That God put Adam's firmament/Heaven under water. Gen 1:6-7
Dogma:>>which is scientifically demonstrably incorrect

False, since you cannot go to the water of the Multiverse which contained Adam's world.

LOL!

No comment. Just pointing towards your fantasies is enough.

Aman>>4. That God did not put our Cosmos under water. Gen 2:4
Dogma:>>which is scientifically demonstrably incorrect

You've lost it since our Cosmos is NOT surrounded by water, as i posted. Learn to read. It does little good to post to those sleeping.

Lecturing me on misreading something ey?
That has got to be one of your most ironic and hypocritical statements.

 

[DogmaHunter]

7. That God created and brought forth from water every living creature Genesis 1:21 Scientists call it coming forth naturally or magically.



Gen 1:21 And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their kind, and every winged fowl after his kind: and God saw that it was good.

The verse doesn't mention sea life but correctly shows that fowl/birds came from water too. This AGREES with Science which shows that ALL living creatures descended from the last universal common ancestor who appeared in the WATER, 13.8 Billion years ago exactly as God told us in Genesis 1.

The creatures made from the dust of the ground by Jesus are the "common ancestors" shaped and molded by the Hands of Jesus. Like mankind, they were Temporary Beings and subject to Death. They are "His kinds" and those created eternally by the Trinity are "Their kinds".

Adam was made temporarily by Lord God/Jesus. Genesis 2:7
He was ALSO "created in God's Image" by God the Trinity. Genesis 1:27

That's not what that verse says.
Do you know what "and" means?

And also, good job ignoring the other verses that I pointed to.

 

[DogmaHunter]

IOW, Godless men changed the name and began teaching our children that it's a fact

Changed what name?

It is factually correct that living things reproduce with modification. You can factually observe that in every single new born of every single species.

, while adding to the creating power of a man-made concept, which is impotent.

There's nothing "man made" about the fact that living things reproduce with modification.

Evolution has NO power to change Apes into Humans

Humans ARE apes, just like humans ARE mammals.

as later versions of "evolution" have falsely taught.

What "later versions"?

Humans are first made so it is impossible that we could have descended from Apes. That's God's Truth in Genesis.

If you are just going to stick dogmatically to your a priori extremists religious beliefs, you're simply going to miss the fact that you are wrong.

Homo Sapiens shows up in the fossil record at best 180.000 years ago.
Life is 3.8 billion years old.