justbyfaith
justified sinner
- May 19, 2017
- 3,461
- 572
- 52
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Calvary Chapel
- Marital Status
- Married
I’m really sorry for those who embrace the piece. Instead of seeking the living God to tell you the state of your heart and deeds you claim your deeds and heart are something holy and righteous because you want to be able to say that. So you find verses and decide yourself they describe you personally. How shocking it will be when such stand before God and their real deeds are measured. They will not be able to say, “ I believed the wet paint principle” for God will say, “I don’t.”
The Wet Paint Principle doesn't save anyone. But understanding it will provide a person with victory in being able to overcome it. And also, God does believe in the Wet Paint Principle; for it is a term that I simply coined in order to describe a principle that God set forth in His word (Romans 7:7-13). Also, you have judged the entire document before even reading the whole thing. See Proverbs 18:13 as to why that is wrong.
justbyfaith said: The holy scripture was inspired of the Holy Spirit but penned by human authors; using their personalities and thought processes as the Holy Spirit moved them along.
This is what you heard from others. This is a very superficial and somewhat incorrect guess.
This is what I read in God's word (2 Timothy 3:16, 2 Peter 1:19-21); I don't recall ever hearing it from any pastor.
It’s also so long no one can write an answer. This too is a part of the self focused theology. The author takes up all the space to write there is. No one else can say much as it’s not allowed.
It is allowed. You can comment on anything you disagree with by writing a post. That is why I provided chapter and verse, for easier reference.
Ever thought that sometimes painters leave the sign on longer than necessary??
Perhaps the reason why people always want to test it.
I repeat, you are very loose with words. So everything you want to make up in terms of doctrine you just say that Jesus doesn’t have to have taught it
The concept that one must be forgiven of all their sins to go to heaven is a matter of common sense. If a person is not forgiven, then their only option is to be punished; and that means hell and then the lake of fire.
The day will come when you’re tempted to sin and the eternal security doctrine will tell you it doesn’t matter and you’ll do it. It permits sin.
Actually not, if you understand how it fits together in the whole of the document, scripturally.
Instead of seeking the living God to tell you the state of your heart and deeds you claim your deeds and heart are something holy and righteous because you want to be able to say that.
You didn't read chapters 3 and 4 yet. And what you say is missing does exist in chapters 1 and 2 to a certain extent.
so full of supporting the self and pride fully in tact,
Again, you have three fingers pointing back at you.
And frankly speaking, they write wet paint on places all over our building and i’ve never seen anyone going by touch it.
People who violate the law don't generally do it publicly if they can help it. They are ususally afraid of judgments from other people.
Nonsense. Did you ever hear their prayers for him? They prayed for MORE of what he had and I guess someone from down answered cause he divorced his wife, left his children and married his lover. Is that what you call “under authority?” Joyner quickly reinstated the unrepentant adulterer. If they had an ounce of discernment, they have done like Peter and Paul and publicly expose and rebuke him. Instead they praised him.
I was unaware of these things. Now of course it appeared that major miracles of healing were going on, so I don't blame them for wanting some of that to be in their ministries. They may have been deceived by the magnitude of what seemed to be happening. I have been ministered to by that genre of Christianity so I wanted to give them the benefit of the doubt, and spoke what I believed had to be true without checking into the details, in their defense.
Did all of the elders who laid hands on him reinstate him; or was it only Rick Joyner? Whose decision was it to take him down from ministry, and why? Are you sure that all of them were endorsing him (in the permanent sense)? Or is it possible that some of them may have temporarily endorsed him for the reasons I specified?
What I do know is that what I have said to you is what I had perceived of the situation at the time. I did not trust Todd Bentley; and if I had been one of those elders and had laid hands on him, it would have been for the purpose of putting him under the authority of the eldership in the case that he ended up sinning publicly. Some of the elders may not have been on that same page as what I was thinking. I did not see every episode of the whole Todd Bentley incident.
Last edited:
Upvote
0