Chaos theory contains God of Theism

[DogmaHunter]

1. Because any slight change in conditions (like the positions of the atoms) in billion years prior to the first cell creation will catastrophically change the outcome to “there is no first cell”, then the probability of atheism is exactly zero.

Please explain how the bolded part, follows from the rest of that statement.

1. Therefore, the atheism does not exist, however atheism is the major problem: The war of Gods: idol of Atheists vs. God of Theists

"the" atheism?
Strange wording.

 

[DogmaHunter]

If you can't prove it, you have theoretical garbage

Yes, yes....
Like the "theoretical garbage" that says that germs are a cause of desease.

 

[DogmaHunter]

Why the definition of Science has been changed? Isn't it a bit stupid not to know why, is it?

It's called "learning" and "making progress".

Some people prefer being stuck in the 1820s apparantly.
I guess we should be glad that it's even as recent as the 1820s. At times we are being served the "wisdom" of 2000 BC, as if the past 4000 years never happened.

 

[DogmaHunter]

How come this change in dictionaries:
year 1828: theology is Science,
year 2018: theology is "nonsense".
Is there proof of it?

Again: progress.

There was a time when astrology and alchemy were seen as "science" too, you know...

 

[DogmaHunter]

Perhaps the returning to year 1828 definition of Science would remove this obstacle?

And if we would return to Ptolomy's understanding of the universe, the literal bible might make sense again.

But why would we do that?

 

[dgiharris]

There is the Atheistical Bible (which is a normal Bible of your choice) but with ‘not’ written at the end of every sentence.

So you see: Atheisticalism specifically anti Christian.

Atheism is not specifically anti Christian, they are not specifically against any religion, they just don't believe in any god. SO atheists are just as much "not" for Christianity as they are "not" for Islam or Judiasm, or *insert religion here*.

 

[bhsmte]

The theory of knowledge. 1) Knowledge is proven to exist. 2) Knowledge defined as sensual observation (even through the instruments) is not reliable definition. Due to mass-psychosis and hallucinations.

This is the science forum. Do you have any science to discuss?

 

[DogmaHunter]

Atheism is not specifically anti Christian, they are not specifically against any religion, they just don't believe in any god. SO atheists are just as much "not" for Christianity as they are "not" for Islam or Judiasm, or *insert religion here*.

 

[Ophiolite]

Yes, yes....
Like the "theoretical garbage" that says that germs are a cause of desease.

You may have meant to type ". . . . germs are a cause of decease". since many deceased persons were killed by germs.

 

[Radrook]

This is the wrong forum for such nonsense.

If that chief Cold Rain in The Face in your Avatar?

 

[HitchSlap]

If that chief Cold Rain in The Face in your Avatar?

Quanah Parker

 

[ViaCrucis]

Haven't read the thread, just blind posting because the phrase "God of Theism" sounded humorously redundant as well as being effectively meaningless.

-CryptoLutheran

 

[joinfree]

Haven't read the thread, just blind posting because the phrase "God of Theism" sounded humorously redundant as well as being effectively meaningless.

-CryptoLutheran

Theists and atheists have two different Gods, which are in war. That is why the debates are pointless.

 

[bhsmte]

LOL

 

[joshua 1 9]

then the probability of atheism is exactly zero.

Atheism has to exist so that theism can exist.

 

[Ophiolite]

Theists and atheists have two different Gods, which are in war. That is why the debates are pointless.

This is completely true, but only if you redefine theist, atheist, different, Gods, war, debates and pointless. Let us know when you have the new definitions available.

 

[ViaCrucis]

Theists and atheists have two different Gods, which are in war. That is why the debates are pointless.

Nope. Theists have many gods, atheists have no gods. That's the dictionary difference between the two.

Hindus, Pagans, Jews/Christians/Muslims all have different gods.

As a Christian I worship the one God of Abraham who I confess and worship "in Trinity, and Trinity in Unity, neither confusing the Persons nor dividing the Essence." Jews and Muslims also worship the one God of Abraham, though they worship Him differently than I do. Hindus, depending on the school of thought, either worship very many gods or worship one god with many expressions. [Neo-]Pagans, usually, worship a pantheon of gods--Kemetic Pagans worship the Egyptian pantheon, Hellenistic Pagans worship the Greek pantheon, Asatruar worship the Norse pantheon; in addition to these there are myriad folk religious practices, including Shinto which recognizes the many kami; often blended or syncrenized with other religions, such as with Buddhism or Taoism.

There is no singular "God of Theism" because theism is a broad stroke that describes the belief in gods or other similar divine beings or spirits.

Atheism, by the very definition of the word, means not-theism. That is where theism is "god-ism" atheism is "no-god-ism".

If you want to try and have a discussion in the real world you have to actually use real world definitions.

-CryptoLutheran

 

[joinfree]

LOL

 

[bhsmte]

Thanks, but I don't need that. I can just read the thread.

 

[joinfree]

Nope. Theists have many gods, atheists have no gods. That's the dictionary difference between the two.

Hindus, Pagans, Jews/Christians/Muslims all have different gods. DIVIDE GODS INTO IDOLS AND THE GOD (OF THEISM). AND THE ATHEISM WILL DIE OUT.