the self replicating watch argument

Status
Not open for further replies.

xianghua

Well-Known Member
Feb 14, 2017
5,215
555
43
tel aviv
✟111,555.00
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Single
Evolution
(1) The change in genetic composition of a population over successive generations, which may be caused by natural selection, inbreeding, hybridization, or mutation.

There is nothing in that definition that conflicts with the creation of the first organisms by a deity.
if so even if all creature were not evolved from a common descent (means human and chimp share no common descent) evolution is true.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Bugeyedcreepy
Upvote 0

Skreeper

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2017
2,471
2,683
30
Germany
✟91,021.00
Country
Germany
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
if so even if all creature were not evolved from a common descent (means human and chimp share no common descent) evolution is true.

Now you're getting it. But lucky for us we have more than enough evidence that confirms our relationship to the other great apes.
 
Upvote 0

FrumiousBandersnatch

Well-Known Member
Mar 20, 2009
15,264
8,058
✟326,961.00
Faith
Atheist
but we do know that we need at least 2 parts: a light detector and a translator system. so its base on things we know and not about things we dont know.
What happens when you breed a Range Rover with a Fiat Punto? are half the offspring 4x4s ?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,851,179
51,516
Guam
✟4,910,888.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
So what do you believe you are made out of? Snips and snails and puppy-dog tails?
We are made from what we are made from ... whatever it is.

But it was mined from the dust of the earth and has no link to anything else.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,851,179
51,516
Guam
✟4,910,888.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
What we were made of is a fact of no theological importance whatever.
But what we were made from does.

God could have made man before He made apes, but He didn't.

Biological evolution says we got here by DNA grandfathering itself from goo, through the zoo, to you.
 
Upvote 0

Speedwell

Well-Known Member
May 11, 2016
23,928
17,625
81
St Charles, IL
✟347,270.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
But what we were made from does.

God could have made man before He made apes, but He didn't.

Biological evolution says we got here by DNA grandfathering itself from goo, through the zoo, to you.
However God did it is fine with me. I'll go with science on this; the "literal" reading of Genesis is distastful to me for other reasons.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Speedwell

Well-Known Member
May 11, 2016
23,928
17,625
81
St Charles, IL
✟347,270.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Because the woman came from the man?
No, because reading it as a strictly literal historical account debases it. Why should God use a second-rate form of literature to tell such an important story?
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,851,179
51,516
Guam
✟4,910,888.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Why should God use a second-rate form of literature to tell such an important story?
Is that what the Bible is to you?

Is this standard Anglican doctrine?
 
Upvote 0

Speedwell

Well-Known Member
May 11, 2016
23,928
17,625
81
St Charles, IL
✟347,270.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Is that what the Bible is to you?

Is this standard Anglican doctrine?
No, the Bible is the inspired word of God. That's standard Anglican doctrine. It's the Bible Christians who are representing it as "100% accurate literal history"--a second-rate form of literature. Anglicans would never do that to the Bible.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,851,179
51,516
Guam
✟4,910,888.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
No, the Bible is the inspired word of God. That's standard Anglican doctrine. It's the Bible Christians who are representing it as "100% accurate literal history"--a second-rate form of literature. Anglicans would never do that to the Bible.
And, of course, a young woman gave birth to a hominid that died on a cross for our sins ... right?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
Status
Not open for further replies.