Funny thing about that: it's not correct, repeats of snowflake shapes have been seen. There's just so much variation in snowflakes, and they are so small, that it's unlikely for random individuals to take notice. That is, from the scope of a light microscope. There might be a few water molecules of difference or something, but you get the gist.
.
Can't say that I get the gist. To me it sounds like an argument just for the sake of arguing to seek acceptance from others by somehow using some trivial logic which has no merit.
Except snowflakes, regardless of being unique or not, form simply through chemical processes.
.
So why did you even address it if you pay the uniqueness no regard? It's just something simple...you could definitely make those same chemical processes before the world began. Turn back time, I'll wait.
Also, the chicken-egg thing doesn't make a whole lot of sense in a context of the first life being single celled.
.
I really don't want to have to explain where the concept of the "What came first, the chicken or the egg?" question. That is like THE CLICHE question concerning this. And to just totally ignore it and say something completely different, has no bearing on my question. Your answers are to your own thoughts in your head. I said nothing of single celled organisms.
Created spiders with the defect of dying from inadequately shedding their exoskeleton and thus being strangled horribly over hours and hours? .
You're literally speaking to yourself again because unless someone on here happens to be an arachnologist, I would speculate that no one cares. And if that were a real occurrence, dumping nuclear waste, the industrial revolution, vehicle emissions, and a multitude of other atrocities against the planet would have to be factored into a deformed spider with a defect. Look up what depleted uranium does to kids then readjust.....
Life has so many problems that I don't think any competent creator would want to have their name associated with it.
.
A. (I am quoting you here) "I don't think" [your words]
B. Atheists [ a person who does not believe in the existence of a god or any gods
: one who subscribes to or advocates atheism ] do not believe in any creator, let alone a competent one, so your point is invalid.
C. Life has opportunity. Problems are how one chooses to look at said opportunities. When one thinks they themselves are "God", then said opportunities become problems, because one never gives those to the real God. A person such as myself, sure I have challenges. But never a problem seeing as how the creator has the power to pull me through and guide me. There are things you will not be able to do on your own.
-_- except abiogenesis experiments have demonstrated that simple cells do form under conditions that mimic those of the ancient Earth back in 2013.
ancient Earth waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay back........in 2013.
...sorry humor.
Put simply, you may only mimic, or pretend during any such experiment. There is just no way to completely have all the variables that are theorized. It was the beginning. No human was alive yet. Your guess, my guess, is just as good as any educated scientist. However, if you ask who was alive......God!!!!! That requires belief. That's it. I got to sleep now. Good chat.
