Not sure what you mean by "cross contamination", considering that one of the means by which a new species can arise is via hybridization. That's how that species of lizard in which all of them are female came to be.
Hybridisation is not a process that happens overnight in the tug of war for one species to prevail over another. In this regard there would be many failed attempts that would lead to death, as in the case of neomorphs and eventually you would have gradual xenomorphing occuring where a species is seen to be winning out over a period of millions of millions of years. In the case of sea based becoming land based, we would expect numerous and I mean numerous morphing to occur because the inclination for the sea based is to copy its parent and yet the force of reckoning is the land based which begins a process of transmutation in the cross contamination of one species over another, until the land based wins out. It could be vice versa also.
So, I actually looked this one up. DNA doesn't have a Fibonnici pattern in it, it occurs in segments 21 angstroms wide by 34 angstroms long, and 21 and 34 happen to be numbers that can occur in the same Fibonnicci sequence. Given that DNA is the genetic material of all known living organisms, it'd be much more mysterious if these numbers weren't consistent between different species. In fact, the chemical properties of molecules demand the consistency.
There is no rule of a chemical property of molecules demanding consistency, when there is hybridisation occurring from one species to another. The pattern in the chaotic changing process are anything but consistent, they would be an unstable state, a tug of war, which would give evidence to countless patterns throughout the process. It is not about starting point and destination in an evolutionary process, rather it is about how you get there and the paths should be infinite in number and need to be proven by the infinite number of patterns connecting one to another. It would be like a murder mystery, because one species has just murdered another through dominance.
species is a label we assign to organisms, not an inherent property of them. Thus, the lines that define the distinctions between species have a level of subjectivity to them. As a result, despite the fact that the genetics of a population are always changing, one cannot pinpoint the exact moment when said population transitions from its "original species" to another.
Orangisms cannot be defined as species, because they are yet to take form and they do not have intellegence. The machinery in organisms are fully automated and not conscious and it would be no different to an engineering plant consisting of machinery. You would still need intellegence and a form to define what the species is. Therefore Evolutionists use wrong defintion of terms like organisms are species and adaptations are evolution.
due to shared ancestry, entirely alien DNA that didn't seem to be related to any other would be evidence AGAINST evolution. Heck, just by virtue of all living things having genetic material made of the same 4 base pairs, the degree of similarity between random DNA segments of equal length is 25% just by random chance. The fact that everything on this planet is more genetically similar to each other than that is part of why we conclude shared ancestry.
I fully am aware that the destined lifeform will still have a common ancestry. This is not what is being contended, rather the processes leading up to the intellegent
lifeform , please highlight
FORM, is anything but shared, it would be a transitioning process which should by rights highlight something else. That something else has not been given into evidence by Evolutionists. This something else would be so numerous, if we take evolution theory at its word that these failed DNA processes would yield variations straight out of science fiction movies, especially when they are happening slowly over millions of millions of years.
