• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

More Red Meat - Transgender Individuals Can't Enter Military Service

mark46

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 29, 2010
20,739
5,061
✟1,025,701.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
This isn't a surprise. Of course, ALL the military branches have said that there is no issue regarding their service, just as been the case for gay, women and blacks in past era.

The base will be happy with, as they will be with his attacks on Senate and House Republicans who are seen as establishment types.

Trump is truly acting like a candidate, rather than a president. This usually happens after the mid-terms.
 

Go Braves

I miss Senator McCain
May 18, 2017
9,646
8,980
Atlanta
✟23,068.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Republican
Just got back from ROTC training. Most of us aren't liberals, most are still opposed to this, on account of how it's wrong, and it's stupid. In order to serve you have to pass tests
proving you're capable. Anybody who passes those tests, wants to serve their country, ought to be able to. Trump's fat butt never served a day, and I doubt any of his children will ever serve.

Trump's claimed that this was about saving money. That's a flat out stupid claim. There's a far bigger waste in dismissing folks who've been trained. It's a huge investment of time & funds, especially for folks like Kristin Beck who was a Navy Seal. The amount of training others to take their place exceeds far the cost of their medical expenses. And the cost of their medical expenses is actually pretty small.
 
Upvote 0

friend of

A private in Gods army
Site Supporter
Dec 28, 2016
5,945
4,225
provincial
✟998,922.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Well I mean... the way society is these days, if Trump did not make this decree you'd have hordes of LGBTQ members signing up for the single reason of getting a free sex change.

Call me old fashioned, but it's not the business of the US military to accommodate sex changes. Correct me if I'm wrong, but what benefit does such a thing yield to defense of the nation?
 
Upvote 0

HawgWyld

Junior Member
May 3, 2013
431
315
Benton, Ark.
Visit site
✟36,824.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
The next step is they need to remove the law making homosexual marriage legal

What law? The U.S. Supreme Court found back in 2015 that gay marriage is a Constitutional right. If the goal is to change that ruling, then the strategy is to pack the Court with justices who are opposed to gay marriage.
 
Upvote 0

Go Braves

I miss Senator McCain
May 18, 2017
9,646
8,980
Atlanta
✟23,068.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Republican
Well I mean... the way society is these days, if Trump did not make this decree you'd have hordes of LGBTQ members signing up for the single reason of getting a free sex change.

Call me old fashioned, but it's not the business of the US military to accommodate sex changes. Correct me if I'm wrong, but what benefit does such a thing yield to defense of the nation?

A 2016 RAND study commissioned by the Pentagon totally contradicts what you wrote. It found that the medical costs for transgender military members would be an "exceedingly small portion of active-component health care expenditures." It estimated that only 29-129 service members would seek transition care. Your theory is completely ridiculous.
 
Upvote 0

Go Braves

I miss Senator McCain
May 18, 2017
9,646
8,980
Atlanta
✟23,068.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Republican
The military isn't about compassion. If you can't deploy, you can't serve.

That's true. There's plenty of transgender folks who were capable of being deployed, so they did and they serve our country. It's not about compassion, but service.
 
Upvote 0

SoldierOfTheKing

Christian Spenglerian
Jan 6, 2006
9,244
3,050
Kenmore, WA
✟303,170.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
This isn't a surprise. Of course, ALL the military branches have said that there is no issue regarding their service, just as been the case for gay, women and blacks in past era.

That is simply untrue. Even if having undergone the surgery were not expressly listed as a condition that medically disqualifies a candidate for military service, the mutilation of the genitals that such surgery entails would. The military isn't too keen about allowing in people with psychological conditions associated with high suicide rates either.

Obama's order to remove transsexualism from the list of medical conditions precluding military service was set to take effect at the end of June this year. The top brass asked Secretary Mattis for a six month delay in the implementation to allow further time to study the effects of the policy change, which Mattis granted. The idea that military leadership was just chomping at the bit to allow more mental cases into the ranks of the armed forces until Trump moved in to stop them is nonsense.
 
Upvote 0

friend of

A private in Gods army
Site Supporter
Dec 28, 2016
5,945
4,225
provincial
✟998,922.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
A 2016 RAND study commissioned by the Pentagon totally contradicts what you wrote. It found that the medical costs for transgender military members would be an "exceedingly small portion of active-component health care expenditures." It estimated that only 29-129 service members would seek transition care. Your theory is completely ridiculous.

It's still an unnecessary expense, but my point was actually that such therapy is on the uptick in comparison with, say, enlistment of 60 years ago, where there were fewer human beings in America so desperate to mutilate their genitals.

There is also a psychological component in all of this that is being ignored and downplayed.
 
Upvote 0

Paul of Eugene OR

Finally Old Enough
Site Supporter
May 3, 2014
6,373
1,858
✟278,532.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
This isn't a surprise. Of course, ALL the military branches have said that there is no issue regarding their service, just as been the case for gay, women and blacks in past era.

The base will be happy with, as they will be with his attacks on Senate and House Republicans who are seen as establishment types.

Trump is truly acting like a candidate, rather than a president. This usually happens after the mid-terms.

Trump likes to reach out and hurt people.
 
Upvote 0

Go Braves

I miss Senator McCain
May 18, 2017
9,646
8,980
Atlanta
✟23,068.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Republican
It's still an unnecessary expense, but my point was actually that such therapy is on the uptick in comparison with, say, enlistment of 60 years ago, where there were fewer human beings in America so desperate to mutilate their genitals.

There is also a psychological component in all of this that is being ignored and downplayed.

The military spends five times as much on viagra than it ever has on transgender medical care. There's a lot of expenses folks would consider unnecessary. The cost of transgender medical care is tiny. It's a fallacy that everyone who is transgender wants to mutilate their genitals. Like the Rand study found, there's very, very few who'd seek that surgery. Most folks I know who've served / are serving in the military don't look down the britches of anybody else. They only care about whether the person beside them is carrying their own weight, doing their own job. There's no evidence the transgender folks who've served honorably in the military aren't doing just that. Trump's spoiled self has never served a day, it's a good thing the folks who have have said this is stupid.

60 years ago there were folks who didn't want women to serve in the military, and history has proven them to be ignorant.

Enlistment has had a long slump. A lot of folks have no desire to enlist, and a lot of those who do try are disqualified because they're too fat.
 
Upvote 0

SoldierOfTheKing

Christian Spenglerian
Jan 6, 2006
9,244
3,050
Kenmore, WA
✟303,170.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
Trump's claimed that this was about saving money. That's a flat out stupid claim.

The facts were that the Congressional budget bill was being held up in the House of Representatives precisely over the question of providing funding for this kind of surgery. It was holding funding for the wall. Trump handle it by reversing Obama's order and rendering the whole issue moot.

There's a far bigger waste in dismissing folks who've been trained. It's a huge investment of time & funds, especially for folks like Kristin Beck who was a Navy Seal. The amount of training others to take their place exceeds far the cost of their medical expenses.

This is what economists call sunk costs. They are losses that have already been taken, and thus do not figure into future cost benefit analysis.
 
Upvote 0

friend of

A private in Gods army
Site Supporter
Dec 28, 2016
5,945
4,225
provincial
✟998,922.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
@Go Braves

If the enlisted is not emotionally/mentally stable enough to reconcile their own anatomy with their gender, why would you expect —less, rely on— such a person to obtain the mental/emotional hardiness required for guerrilla combat?
 
Upvote 0

jayem

Naturalist
Jun 24, 2003
15,427
7,165
74
St. Louis, MO.
✟424,830.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0

Belk

Senior Member
Site Supporter
Dec 21, 2005
30,804
15,254
Seattle
✟1,195,781.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
This quip is false equivalence.

The concern is over placing unstable individuals into positions that range from pedestrian to excruciatingly stressful. I think we can all agree that any functioning military operates on the creed of minimizing risk in every conceivable form it presents itself. Greater stability translates into lower risk.

Are you a mental health professional? If not what are your qualifications for labeling transgender individuals as unstable?
 
Upvote 0

GoldenBoy89

We're Still Here
Sep 25, 2012
26,683
29,511
LA
✟659,721.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
The next step is they need to remove the law making homosexual marriage legal
There is no law that makes gay marriage legal. The laws that made it illegal have been ruled unconstitutional.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Innsmuthbride
Upvote 0

Simmeh

Flying Bugbear
Apr 11, 2014
103
33
✟23,347.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
It's been years since I posted here, but I came back just to address this issue, because I think I have some personal insight.

Now, I don't serve in the US armed forces. I do, however, serve the armed forces of my own country. Also, one of the guys I did basic training with is now a woman.

And you know what? I don't care. In fact, it's probably a good thing. According to her, she's in a much better place now as being able to express as a woman relieved a whole bunch of anger issues.

See, I don't care how you express your gender or who or who your parents are or who you choose to sleep with (provided there was consent, obviously). If you can handle the physical and mental stress of the profession and can do the tasks required of your trade, you are welcome to share a foxhole (literal or proverbial) with me.
 
Upvote 0

lasthero

Newbie
Jul 30, 2013
11,421
5,795
✟236,977.00
Faith
Seeker
It's been years since I posted here, but I came back just to address this issue, because I think I have some personal insight.

Now, I don't serve in the US armed forces. I do, however, serve the armed forces of my own country. Also, one of the guys I did basic training with is now a woman.

And you know what? I don't care. In fact, it's probably a good thing. According to her, she's in a much better place now as being able to express as a woman relieved a whole bunch of anger issues.

See, I don't care how you express your gender or who or who your parents are or who you choose to sleep with (provided there was consent, obviously). If you can handle the physical and mental stress of the profession and can do the tasks required of your trade, you are welcome to share a foxhole (literal or proverbial) with me.

That's what makes America great.
 
Upvote 0