nonaeroterraqueous
Nonexistent Member
I've seen about three different explanations, and none of them are terribly biblical.
- The age of accountability: that everyone is innocent until a certain age. Besides being nowhere in the Bible, it denies the notion of original sin. If Hitler had died as a baby, or worse, if Godwin had died as a baby, then he would have gone to Heaven and we'd all be stuck with him for the rest of eternity. It presumes a person good because they haven't had a chance to do bad things. It's like having a bomb in your car, but the car doesn't blow up because it won't start; therefore you declare that it was a "safe" car. If two wrongs don't make a right, then an early death does not make a scoundrel righteous. Otherwise, we should be promoting abortion zealously. It would be a far more effective campaign than mere evangelism.
- Infant baptism: ascribes salvific power to baptism. If you baptize a baby, then it's ready for Heaven. This idea presumes that one person's faith can serve to save another. It's not really biblical, and baptism is not very meaningful if the person doesn't choose to do it.
- Salvation from eternity: this is the idea that because God knew us in our mothers' womb, he therefore knew who we were and how we would be judged. In other words, we know a rotten tree by its fruit, but God knows a rotten tree before it ever sprouts. In this case, the person is judged for who they are and not what they do. The problem with this idea is that the Bible emphasizes salvation by accepting the Son of God, repenting and being baptized, none of which options are available to the fatally young. The situation for a baby in a Christian mother's arms is similar to the situation of a lonely goat herder in Tibet who never heard of Christ. That's the real problem, though, isn't it? How does God judge those who never had a chance?
Upvote
0