- Apr 17, 2006
- 6,467
- 4,001
- 47
- Country
- Australia
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- AU-Greens
The criticism can't be described as cogent due to Answers in Genesis fundamental errors and distortions about evolution. The mischaracterise it as only a violent struggle between individuals for supremacy.The information stands or falls on its own merit.
------------------------------------------------------------
BTW
Cogent criticism of quack ideas isn’t bad-mouthing biology
They completely ignore the value in cooperation or adapting to unused niches as evolutionary advantages.
Given that AiG won'tr even examine evidence that they are incorrect (their statement of faith won't allow it), I find any assertion about the evidence of actual research scientists suspect at best.
Upvote
0