When did God, the Son, or Christ become "less than" the Father...? (John 10:29, John 14:28)...

Quort

Active Member
May 6, 2017
77
22
71
Elgin
✟10,413.00
Country
United States
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Private
When did God, the Son, or Christ become "less than" the Father...? (John 10:29, John 14:28)...

Peace,

God Bless!

Strange question. God the Father and God the Son are eternal. Thus their positions are never as 'becoming'. They are.

Quort
 
Upvote 0

tstor

Well-Known Member
Apr 28, 2017
667
592
Maryland
✟45,260.00
Country
United States
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Celibate
Verses 4-8:

Let each of you look not only to his own interests, but also to the interests of others. Have this mind among yourselves, which is yours in Christ Jesus, who, though he was in the form of God, did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped, but emptied himself, by taking the form of a servant, being born in the likeness of men. And being found in human form, he humbled himself by becoming obedient to the point of death, even death on a cross. (ESV)
I have a unitarian discussion of it posted on here. It may help you understand the passage:
Arian vs Socinian interpretation of Philippians 2:5-9
 
Upvote 0

Neogaia777

Old Soul
Site Supporter
Oct 10, 2011
23,291
5,252
45
Oregon
✟961,697.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Celibate
Strange question. God the Father and God the Son are eternal. Thus their positions are never as 'becoming'. They are.

Quort
One had to become, at one point, if anything to experience the process of becoming, which is a human trait...

God Bless!
 
Upvote 0

Quort

Active Member
May 6, 2017
77
22
71
Elgin
✟10,413.00
Country
United States
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Private
One had to become, at one point, if anything to experience the process of becoming, which is a human trait...

God Bless!

Again, the Son always existed with the Father. He never became. Neither did the Father become. Theirs is not a human trait. Thus when the Son took on a human body, that same existance did not change between Him and the Father.

Quort
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Neogaia777
Upvote 0

Neogaia777

Old Soul
Site Supporter
Oct 10, 2011
23,291
5,252
45
Oregon
✟961,697.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Celibate
Again, the Son always existed with the Father. He never became. Neither did the Father become. Theirs is not a human trait. Thus when the Son took on a human body, that same existance did not change between Him and the Father.

Quort
I'm just going to politely smile at you, cause I think your just so cute...

Peace,

God Bless!
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

tstor

Well-Known Member
Apr 28, 2017
667
592
Maryland
✟45,260.00
Country
United States
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Celibate
Or...because you have nothing else to offer. Smile away.

Quort
Your understanding of the trinity is flawed. It is much easier to just not comment on such a large topic than to get overly involved when both people actually agree.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Neogaia777
Upvote 0

Neogaia777

Old Soul
Site Supporter
Oct 10, 2011
23,291
5,252
45
Oregon
✟961,697.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Celibate
Strange question. God the Father and God the Son are eternal. Thus their positions are never as 'becoming'. They are.

Quort
Ok, I'll bite, I'll be your huckleberry...

So, they know, or knew nothing about the process of becoming then...? Or not, am I wrong...?

How could they know anything about the process of becoming if they never had to become...?

Peace,

God Bless!
 
Upvote 0

Quort

Active Member
May 6, 2017
77
22
71
Elgin
✟10,413.00
Country
United States
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Private
Your understanding of the trinity is flawed. It is much easier to just not comment on such a large topic than to get overly involved when both people actually agree.

Please. If you have something to say...to prove...or disprove, say on. Spare me your otherwise 'unhelpful advice'. It is not wanted, or needed.

Quort
 
Upvote 0

tstor

Well-Known Member
Apr 28, 2017
667
592
Maryland
✟45,260.00
Country
United States
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Celibate
Please. If you have something to say...to prove...or disprove, say on. Spare me your otherwise 'unhelpful advice'. It is not wanted, or needed.

Quort
The OP asked:
When did God, the Son, or Christ become "less than" the Father...? (John 10:29, John 14:28)...

Your response was:
God the Father and God the Son are eternal. Thus their positions are never as 'becoming'. They are.

Yet this is fundamentally wrong, as the Son has indeed humbled Himself. He became flesh. (Philippians 2:4-8).
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Quort

Active Member
May 6, 2017
77
22
71
Elgin
✟10,413.00
Country
United States
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Private
Ok, I'll bite, I'll be your huckleberry...

So, they know, or knew nothing about the process of becoming then...? Or not, am I wrong...?

Peace,

God Bless!

Yes, you are wrong. Again, the Father and Son never became. Thus there was no knowledge of their becoming. Such knowledge didn't exist because it never was.

Quort
 
Upvote 0

Quort

Active Member
May 6, 2017
77
22
71
Elgin
✟10,413.00
Country
United States
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Private
The OP asked:
When did God, the Son, or Christ become "less than" the Father...? (John 10:29, John 14:28)...

Your response was:
God the Father and God the Son are eternal. Thus their positions are never as 'becoming'. They are.

Yet this is fundamentally wrong, as the Son has indeed humbled Himself. He became flesh. (Philippians 2:4-8).

The Father and Son existed eternally before the Son became flesh.

Quort
 
Upvote 0

Neogaia777

Old Soul
Site Supporter
Oct 10, 2011
23,291
5,252
45
Oregon
✟961,697.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Celibate
Yes, you are wrong. Again, the Father and Son never became. Thus there was no knowledge of their becoming. Such knowledge didn't exist because it never was.

Quort
Cryptic, but, OK, I'll let you be, OK...?

I'm not here to argue but to discuss with those willing to discuss this, logically, reasonably...

Peace,

God Bless!
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Neogaia777

Old Soul
Site Supporter
Oct 10, 2011
23,291
5,252
45
Oregon
✟961,697.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Celibate
The Father and Son existed eternally before the Son became flesh.

Quort
Anything change when he became flesh...?

He himself says (I think) that he had lay aside or lay down his former glory that he had with the Father...? What's in this glory...?

God Bless!
 
  • Agree
Reactions: tstor
Upvote 0