TagliatelliMonster
Well-Known Member
Oh, so "sciencedidit.
Science explains. Science doesn't "do".
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Oh, so "sciencedidit.
I don't even come close to saying that.The only way you can marry this phenomena with your flood myth, is by stating that god went out of his way to explicitly make all traces of said genetic bottlenecks disappear magically in all species.
And I'll say it again:Biologically seeing, a population over 300 individuals normally should do just fine in surviving.
And I'll say it again:TagliatelliMonster said:A population of mere 8 individuals, while 3 are even siblings and sons of the 4th one?
That population is biologically doomed to extinction.
I won't dignify this with a response.TagliatelliMonster said:Assuming the book reflects actualy reality, off course.
But we all know that it doesn't. You know it to. I don't buy for a second that you truelly believe otherwise.
Make sure they don't get away with getting required safety checks waived as well, or you may be drilling for water in someone's pond again.Hmmm...
Perhaps you should look up what the average required credentials are of people that are hired to tell oil companies where to drill next in search of oil... and what criteria they use to conclude where there is a good chance of hitting oil.
And I'll say it again:
It depends on how robust the survivors are, and if they are genetically fit to institute a bottleneck recovery.And I'll say it again:
It depends on how robust the survivors are, and if they are genetically fit to institute a bottleneck recovery.
And guess what?
Genesis 9:1 And God blessed Noah and his sons, and said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth.
I would say that is a prophecy that they were robust and genetically fit to institute a bottleneck recovery.I won't dignify this with a response.
Make sure they don't get away with getting required safety checks waived as well, or you may be drilling for water in someone's pond again.
I don't even come close to saying that.
What???I understand your position on this matter, but at least be logically consistent?
Doubts? I have no idea what you're getting at.JD16 said:If you have doubts that a population of 300 or even 1 million has a chance of surviving,
Um ... you must have me mixed up with someone else?JD16 said:... then turn around in the next sentence and state that you believe a group of 8 did repopulate the earth......it's mind boggling to say the least
And I'll say it again:
It depends on how robust the survivors are, and if they are genetically fit to institute a bottleneck recovery.
Feel better now?I didn't say you did.
I said that going that route is "the only way" you can acknowledge the existance of the actual evidence AND marry it with a flood myth as if it actually happened.
Your only other option to hang on to the flood myth is simply denying/ignoring the facts of reality.
Both are irrational positions, but in the first one there is at least the attempt to maintain some form of internal consistency and no need to simply ignore the facts of reality.
What???Doubts? I have no idea what you're getting at.
I thought my OP was clear enough.Um ... you must have me mixed up with someone else?
Yes it is a matter of robustness.No. It's not a matter of health, fitness or robustness.
In consequence of such population size reductions and the loss of genetic variation, the robustness of the population is reduced and its ability to survive selecting environmental changes, like climate change or a shift in available resources, is reduced.
Conversely, depending upon the causes of the bottleneck, the survivors may have been the genetically fittest individuals, hence increasing the frequency of the fitter genes within the gene pool, while shrinking it.
Post 319 is yours, not mine.Please refer to post #319 thanks
It fits with population trends. They have a general time and an amount.AV,
I understand your position on this matter, but at least be logically consistent? If you have doubts that a population of 300 or even 1 million has a chance of surviving, then turn around in the next sentence and state that you believe a group of 8 did repopulate the earth......it's mind boggling to say the least
This bottlenecking stuff can take a hike.Is this just a lucky coincidence?
Post 319 is yours, not mine.
I'll tell you what, JD.
This is my fourth attempt at trying to understand what a bottleneck is; and if I have to take this much flack for it, that's fine.
Nuts to it.
Just don't whine if later you see me simply saying, BOTTLENECKS CAN TAKE A HIKE whenever anyone mentions one.
At least I made an attempt.
And if I don't understand it ... so be it.
You guys are always harping that we should try and learn something, and if this is what we get for it, praise God I'm an ignoramus.
I don't need to cloud my mind up with useless facts and figures, and can concentrate on the Scriptures instead.
As I said before, even if I was as knowledgeable as Ken Ham or Kent Hovind, it wouldn't only mean I'd be ridiculed that much more.
Ignorance is bliss.
It fits with population trends. They have a general time and an amount.
Where are all the people? - creation.com
The Jews are descendants of Jacob (also called Israel). The number of Jews in the world in 1930, before the Nazi Holocaust, was estimated at 18 million. This represents a doubling in population, on average, every 156 years, or 0.44% growth per year since Jacob. Since the Flood, after which the world population was eight, the world population has doubled every 155 years, or grown at an average of 0.45% per year. There is agreement between the growth rates for the two populations. Is this just a lucky coincidence?