Question on Noah's Ark

[dad]

The only thing it confirms is you need stronger meds

Actually the failure to post support for science claims can't be waved away.

 

[JD16]

Those who can't produce a solid science case for their science claims can do what they like. Who cares?

And those who know jack can quote scriptures? ok deal

 

[JD16]

Actually the failure to post support for science claims can't be waved away.

As opposed to the ability to make crap up as they go along?

 

[dad]

And those who know jack can quote scriptures? ok deal

Opinion of God's word noted.

 

[dad]

As opposed to the ability to make sh*t up as they go along?

We wait for the goods from you for your pasta state past of fake news science. It will be examined fairly.

 

[JD16]

Opinion of God's word noted.

I didn't mention anything about God's word,...rather the people who think its God's word
You want God's word? sure...

hare kṛṣṇa hare kṛṣṇa
kṛṣṇa kṛṣṇa hare hare
hare rāma hare rāma
rāma rāma hare hare

 

[JD16]

We wait for the goods from you for your pasta state past of fake news science. It will be examined fairly.

Did someone said pasta?

Touched by his noodly appendage-Leonardo So Itchy

 

[dad]

I didn't mention anything about God's word,...rather the people who think its God's word
You want God's word? sure...

hare kṛṣṇa hare kṛṣṇa
kṛṣṇa kṛṣṇa hare hare
hare rāma hare rāma
rāma rāma hare hare

That's nice.

 

[JD16]

That's nice.

Glad you like it

 

[dad]

Did someone said pasta?

Touched by his noodly appendage-Leonardo So Itchy

Sorry didn't mean to get you excited.

 

[dad]

Glad you like it

OK

 

[JD16]

Sorry didn't mean to get you excited.

Not a prob, was hungry anywayz

 

[dad]

Not a prob, was hungry anywayz

I'll let you get back to your research and presentation preparation supporting your same state pasta past fake news science claim. Good luck with that.

 

[JD16]

I'll let you get back to your research and presentation preparation supporting your same state pasta past fake news science claim. Good luck with that.

Thats nice of you, and I'll let you get back to generating more crap,...good luck amigo!

 

[HitchSlap]

Long as you don't pretend to know what you are talking about we are OK!

No problem there.

 

[dad]

Thats nice of you, and I'll let you get back to generating more crap,...good luck amigo!

No problem. We will wait for your presentation of proof for the same state past nature. Till then.....

 

[dad]

Cheers

 

[JD16]

No problem. We will wait for your presentation of proof for the same state past nature. Till then.....

Sure sure, you have a good one ya? And keep on rocking my man woohoo!

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

Sorry ... I still don't get it.

And I'm being serious here.We call that a "judgment from God."Not to mention the population itself.There were four lines of "genetic diversity" after the Flood: Noah's, Shem's, Ham's, and Japheth's. Just how many are required?Not if God decrees otherwise. But let's say He didn't. Again, you have four lines of diversity getting off the Ark. How many do you need?Yes ... nature operates much more slowly than God in some areas. That's why nature had nothing to do with this.

Google "genetic bottleneck" and read or whatch a 3 minute video. It's not hard.
But I doubt you care enough about being rational to go through that effort.

Having said that, in reality, a population as small as what is depicted in your story, is doomed to extinction. The lack of genetic variation is fatal.

 

[AV1611VET]

Google "genetic bottleneck" and read or whatch a 3 minute video. It's not hard.

I'll pass.

But I doubt you care enough about being rational to go through that effort.

I'm not interested in hearing how a natural process ... without God in the picture at all ... is used to explain how God couldn't have orchestrated a miracle in the past.

It's like saying a bowl couldn't have been filled with water, then emptied ... because you don't believe in plumbing.