Man is an ape. To save time, I'll just quote the Australian Museum:
Humans are primates, but the primates that we most closely resemble are the apes. We are therefore classified along with all other apes in a primate sub-group known as the hominoids (Superfamily Hominoidea).
This ape group can be further subdivided into the Great Apes and Lesser Apes. Humans have bodies that are genetically and structurally very similar to those of the Great Apes and so we are classified in the Great Apes sub-group which is also known as the hominids (Family Hominidae).
Humans, by taxonomic definition, are apes.
That's fine, but I don't think anyone else on the planet believes this either. That appears to be a desperately ill-informed strawman sketch of universal common ancestry. It skips about 3.8 billion years of biological development.
Which is fine.
However, if you seek to challenge well evidenced arguments about the nature of reality and the history of biological diversification, your evidence should be at least as good, if not better, than that which supports the current understanding.
All these are beliefs and claims, unsupported by evidence.
I'm not comfortable with the beliefs you hold - as I think they're ill formed - but I'm fine with you holding them.
However, if you seek to bastardise the Theory of Evolution in order to into it into the framework of the Christian creation account, then I have an issue.
So, I'd like to ask you:
What evidence can you present that "creation is wearing down", that there was ever a "perfected" biological state, that there was a "fall" and that it "effected everything"?