• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

5 Challenges to Trump's Wall

Armoured

So is America great again yet?
Site Supporter
Aug 31, 2013
34,362
14,061
✟257,467.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0

Shiloh Raven

Well-Known Member
May 14, 2016
12,509
11,491
Texas
✟243,180.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Not just eminent domain either - straight up violation of treaties and Native American sovereignty along 75 miles of the border that belong to a native American tribe.

That would be the Tohono O’odham Nation, the Cocopah Tribe, the Kumeyaay Nation, and the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo.

President Trump ignores tribes in executive order on US-Mexico border wall

Also, read this article: AZ Indian Tribe That Controls 75 Miles of Border Won’t Allow TRUMP WALL on their Land (VIDEO)
 
Upvote 0

GondwanaLand

Newbie
Dec 8, 2013
1,187
712
✟52,472.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
Would such a person use violence though, or refuse to stop when asked?
Who said anything about using violence or not stopping when asked? Sounds like you're back pedalling. Oh and I'd say most ranchers and such down there likely have guns, so......
 
Upvote 0

blackribbon

Not a newbie
Dec 18, 2011
13,388
6,673
✟205,401.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Weren't you talking about trawling the schools a minute ago?

Schools don't require proof of citizenship. In fact, illegals get enrolled with less paperwork than citizens. Citizenship isn't a requirement to attend government schools. However, the birth certificate is required to play league baseball...they probably take Mexican ones though because they are proving age, not citizenship.
 
Upvote 0

GondwanaLand

Newbie
Dec 8, 2013
1,187
712
✟52,472.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
  • Like
Reactions: Shiloh Raven
Upvote 0

Armoured

So is America great again yet?
Site Supporter
Aug 31, 2013
34,362
14,061
✟257,467.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Schools don't require proof of citizenship. In fact, illegals get enrolled with less paperwork than citizens. Citizenship isn't a requirement to attend government schools. However, the birth certificate is required to play league baseball...they probably take Mexican ones though because they are proving age, not citizenship.
So are you suggesting cops should target schools for illegal immigrant checks or not? Just so I understand your position?
 
Upvote 0

blackribbon

Not a newbie
Dec 18, 2011
13,388
6,673
✟205,401.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Who said anything about using violence or not stopping when asked? Sounds like you're back pedalling. Oh and I'd say most ranchers and such down there likely have guns, so......

I'd say most likely ALL ranchers have guns. You need them to protect your livestock from wildlife and to be able to put an injured animal down rather than let them suffer.
 
Upvote 0

GondwanaLand

Newbie
Dec 8, 2013
1,187
712
✟52,472.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
Upvote 0

roamer_1

Well-Known Member
Jan 12, 2016
738
337
Northwest Montana, USA
✟31,070.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others

Let's not underestimate the desperation of a refugee/cartel mule.


I am not underestimating.

Besides, the harder to cross, the harder to patrol... therefore, the more desirable to cross.

False. At least in mountains. Observation points control vast areas, and since the terrain is nearly impassable, spotted offenders can be predicted and intercepted with ease.

If there was ever a legitimate use of eminent domain, don't expect American people to accept it... least of all in Texas.

Considering that border ranches are overrun with illegal aliens, and assaulted by drug gangs, stopping the problem is probably foremost on their minds. And it doesn't matter. private land or not, inevitably there is right of way. I don't even think it is an eminent domain issue.

As are solutions to the solutions... again, rivers flood, mountains crumble...

nah. 90% of construction is going to be on top of road bed - The road needs to be there to afford patrol and repair. roads themselves run along rivers all the time. riprap or concrete padding effectively prevent washout. And the mountain roads up here in GNP were just recently rebuilt, after some hundred years of heavy use. And I'm talking real mountains, and white water, not the podunk hills down there, and the piddly little Rio Grande.


Are we going with the "unfettered passage" narrative?

Indeed. It is all but unfettered passage now.

Including our own.

So what?

Some get through -- some will always get through -- but many more get caught.

no, they don't.

"Brutal..." not a word usually encouraged when it comes to law enforcement...

It isn't law enforcement. It is border protection. That falls under military aegis. Military protocol. We may treat it as law enforcement, but it is legitimately a military jurisdiction. The only in-country military jurisdiction.
And if it was treated as a militarized zone, we wouldn't have this problem.
 
Upvote 0

blackribbon

Not a newbie
Dec 18, 2011
13,388
6,673
✟205,401.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
So are you suggesting cops should target schools for illegal immigrant checks or not? Just so I understand your position?

The poster made it sound like finding illegal immigrants was hard to do. They are easy enough to find through their children in the public schools. Should we be paying to educate non-legal non-citizens? Does citizenship mean anything anymore? Doesn't promising them free school if they can just get their babies here kind of encourage them to risk the lives of those same children?
 
Upvote 0

blackribbon

Not a newbie
Dec 18, 2011
13,388
6,673
✟205,401.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status

I don't know that I'd consider it really owning land if I wasn't legally allowed to enter into a contract to buy it. Sounds kind of iffy to me. Anyway, my sister's husband has never become naturalized even though he has spent most of his life living in Texas because he wants to be able to inherit his family's property. I was told by them that only Mexican citizens can own property.
 
Upvote 0

Armoured

So is America great again yet?
Site Supporter
Aug 31, 2013
34,362
14,061
✟257,467.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
The poster made it sound like finding illegal immigrants was hard to do. They are easy enough to find through their children in the public schools. Should we be paying to educate non-legal non-citizens? Does citizenship mean anything anymore? Doesn't promising them free school if they can just get their babies here kind of encourage them to risk the lives of those same children?
How do you tell which kids are the kids of illegal immigrants, exactly?

I'm not arguing in favour of illegal immigrants at all. But that doesn't make my practical objections to the proposals I'm seeing any less legitimate.
 
Upvote 0

roamer_1

Well-Known Member
Jan 12, 2016
738
337
Northwest Montana, USA
✟31,070.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Not just eminent domain either - straight up violation of treaties and Native American sovereignty along 75 miles of the border that belong to a native American tribe.

I can't believe this nonsense. The US government has right of way along the border, established by Roosevelt, I think.
 
Upvote 0

GondwanaLand

Newbie
Dec 8, 2013
1,187
712
✟52,472.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
I can't believe this nonsense. The US government has right of way along the border, established by Roosevelt, I think.
Not when it comes to sovereign Native American land. But hey we can continue our slide back into the 18th century under this president and just steal some more land from them darned Injuns, eh?
 
Upvote 0

roamer_1

Well-Known Member
Jan 12, 2016
738
337
Northwest Montana, USA
✟31,070.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Upvote 0

roamer_1

Well-Known Member
Jan 12, 2016
738
337
Northwest Montana, USA
✟31,070.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Not when it comes to sovereign Native American land. But hey we can continue our slide back into the 18th century under this president and just steal some more land from them darned Injuns, eh?

YES, it does include reservations. The sovereignty of native reservations is not even equal to states, and certainly does not trump the international border.
 
Upvote 0

Shiloh Raven

Well-Known Member
May 14, 2016
12,509
11,491
Texas
✟243,180.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Not when it comes to sovereign Native American land. But hey we can continue our slide back into the 18th century under this president and just steal some more land from them darned Injuns, eh?

The United States government has been violating the constitution since the very beginning. According to Article VI of the United States Constitution: "all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land" but the US government has violated the hundreds of treaties it signed with the Indian Nations.
 
Upvote 0