Michael asked me to start a new thread about his solar model
Unless Michael has come up with a new solar model in the last few months then this is his idea that the Sun has a rigid iron crust.
Here is his web site: The surface of the Sun. The sun has a rigid iron surface located under the photosphere that is revealed by satellite imagery The solar surface sits beneath the sun's visible photosphere and is electrically active.
There are many problems with this idea starting with the little fact that the photosphere is defined as the region where light escapes from the Sun. Thus by definition you can not see light from "under the photosphere" !
The opacity of the photosphere means that you cannot even see more than 100 kilometers below the top of the photosphere. Astronomers have tried really hard to look as deep as they can into the photosphere and that is the limit that physics stops them at.
The next problem is that the temperature of the photosphere is ~5700 K as he admits here (but will probably retract) and the mainstream evidence supports. The melting point of Fe is 1811 K. So no iron surface can exist, rigid or not.
So let us see if Michael presents an actual model and predictions.
so here it is .Stop hijacking this thread. If you want to discuss solar physics (something else you know nothing about), do it in the right thread. I won't respond to your solar questions in this thread.
Unless Michael has come up with a new solar model in the last few months then this is his idea that the Sun has a rigid iron crust.
Here is his web site: The surface of the Sun. The sun has a rigid iron surface located under the photosphere that is revealed by satellite imagery The solar surface sits beneath the sun's visible photosphere and is electrically active.
There are many problems with this idea starting with the little fact that the photosphere is defined as the region where light escapes from the Sun. Thus by definition you can not see light from "under the photosphere" !
The opacity of the photosphere means that you cannot even see more than 100 kilometers below the top of the photosphere. Astronomers have tried really hard to look as deep as they can into the photosphere and that is the limit that physics stops them at.
The next problem is that the temperature of the photosphere is ~5700 K as he admits here (but will probably retract) and the mainstream evidence supports. The melting point of Fe is 1811 K. So no iron surface can exist, rigid or not.
So let us see if Michael presents an actual model and predictions.