Why are you unable to answer questions about science from 4 years ago?
You are deliberately trying to divert attention away from the fact that your "space expansion/acceleration" claims remain *without* empirical lab support as a possible *cause*. You evidently have "unwavering faith" in a process that is completely *unseen* in any lab on Earth in terms of a demonstration of cause of photon redshift. You have *zero* evidence to support your *faith* based belief as to "cause". I'm not personally obligated to demonstrate that empirical processes can and do "explain" the same observations. The static universe "test" paper that I cited earlier did all that for me anyway. Who cares what you personally want or need or expect from me personally anyway?
In terms of demonstrated "causes" of photon redshift, that's been done for *every* known type of inelastic scattering, not just one! The "tired light" model is designed to test them "all", and it passed that test just as well as any expansion model.
It's *your* responsibility to demonstrate that the *only* possible way to explain photon redshift is *your* way, and you simply cannot do that. Therefore, around and around you go, shirking your responsibilities to demonstrate your claims, and blaming me personally for all your failures in the lab.
I'm certainly not required to demonstrate that only *one* type of scattering will necessarily explain *all* forms of photon redshift. That's another one of your own completely bogus arguments. There are *many* types of inelastic scattering options that probably all play some role in that process.
That "test" paper demonstrates that any "tired light" model of photon redshift works *mathematically* to explain exactly the same observations, and unlike your undemonstrated claims, all of those types of inelastic scattering show up in the lab and have a real effect on real photons in real experiments. They are all *viable* alternatives that must be considered individually as well as collectively.
Your claim on the other hand is remains a *pure act of faith* on the part of the "believer". No *cause/effect* relationship was ever demonstrated between photons losing momentum and "space expansion", let alone "space acceleration".
You have faith in *multiple* impotent on Earth, supernatural entities galore, so what exactly is your beef with the concept of God again?