When you can demonstrate how something can self create itself from nothing....get back to me.Why?
Is it? When was "nothing" ever studied, to be able to make such an assessment?
Go to a quantum physicist, and repeat that.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
When you can demonstrate how something can self create itself from nothing....get back to me.Why?
Is it? When was "nothing" ever studied, to be able to make such an assessment?
Go to a quantum physicist, and repeat that.
That's incorrect. It's the other way round: time exists inside the universe.
Space-time is what the universe consists of. Time is an integral part of the universe.
So to say that the universe exists INSIDE of time, is just plain wrong.
Well... strictly speaking, the universe DID always exist.
You see... "always" is a period of time. For all of time, to be exact.
So whenever time itself existed, there was a universe. How could it be otherwise, since time is an integral part of the of the universe?
So yea... the space-time continuum has always existed. That is not an incorrect statement at all.
Time isn't infinite in the past.
I agree...which is a major problem for you and how stuff got here.Again: time isn't infinite in the past.
Just like you can't deny the possibility that pixies make grass grow, that we are all in brains in vats or that leperechauns hide pots of gold at the bases of rainbows.
Pointing out that unfalsifiable claims can't be falsified, is as useless as it gets.
Exactly what they'd say about yours.Theirs.
Again, they too would say the same of yours compared to their Documentation.By comparing it to the Documentation.
It seems Satan (if he existed) could Easily pull the wool over your eyes given the deceptions you've attributed to him. How could you know that your white robed friends haven't been hoodwinked by Satan, just like you?Can you tell which team you're on if you score a touchdown and those in white robes cheer, while those in white lab coats frown and complain?
Right after you demonstrate how someone has always existed, then randomly decided one day to poof everything out of nothing.When you can demonstrate how something can self create itself from nothing....get back to me.
Right after you demonstrate how someone has always existed, then randomly decided one day to poof everything out of nothing.
I already have...inorder for anything to exist there has to be an uncreated creator. Plain and simple.
It's not even much of a claim. The argument presented tells us nothing at all about the nature of that creator. It might even be an entity which would not offend the sensibilities of an atheist. In particular, it is a very long step indeed between the "uncreated creator" and the God of 57's Bible.Assertion is not evidence or support for a claim.
Then show all of us how stuff got here.
I don't have to. Your claim is that an "uncreated creator" did it all, so you're the one that needs to support the claim.
Secondly, I don't know "how stuff got here". Pre-Big Bang cosmology is not a field I'm particularly conversant with I've got a fuzzy, layman's understanding of the rapid expansion of space time post the Planc-epoch, the formation of Baryonic matter and the development of the macro-scale universe.
My absence of an explanation does not advance your hypothesis one iota though. Until you can provide valid, supporting evidence for your claim of an "uncreated creator" - instead of pure argument with assertion - I'm fine with "I don't know".
I would note though, that at no point in history have we ever discovered a supernatural explanation that overrides an earlier naturalistic explanation.
This thread is about evolution folks. And apologetics are not allowed in this subforum.
I'm partial to Wegenerism.
...are you a moderator or are you trying to stir the pot? You see USincognito, this is why I really don't respond to your post.This thread is about evolution folks. And apologetics are not allowed in this subforum.
So the last time you posted in this thread was like Oct 21st and that post said
....and you feel you have the right to come in here on post 511 and say:
...are you a moderator or are you trying to stir the pot? You see USincognito, this is why I really don't respond to your post.
Sure you do need to explain...if you want to be an atheist.
Otherwise I presented a pathway for there being a God...which you are forbidden to allow. (believe).
My question to you is how did stuff come about? You just answered with "I don't know" which is an acceptable answer. I like your honesty. Your problem is that you fail to explore other option that show the need for a God. The ontological argument, or this form of it shows..requires...an uncreated creator...as you have no explanation how stuff can self create from nothing or if it existed eternally how time got to the "now". As a "layman" I would think you would want to explore that avenue. Why does the idea of an uncreated creator bother you?
What evidense do you have that shows there was no God? If I remember correctly you said...I don't know. I did thank you for being honest.You presented an assertion that God made the universe. I disbelieve that claim, and I will continue to disbelieve it until such evidence becomes available to overcomes my skepticism of that claim.
Do you believe them?Exactly what they'd say about yours.
What evidense do you have that shows there was no God? If I remember correctly you said...I don't know. I did thank you for being honest.
I have not claimed there is no God/gods.