Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
You can think about it for as long or short as you'd like. But it has nothing to do with the question I asked.
If you used this hermaneutic, you couldn't apply very much of the Bible's spiritual truths or instructions to yourself today.
If you really think that way about Peter, that means you might as well tear 1st and 2nd Peter out of your Bible because they weren't written directly to you, thus, none of it applies to you.
In fact, just throw away your entire New Testament, because none of it was written to you as you didn't exist when it was written.
Romans was written to Romans. You're not Roman so ignore Romans.
Hebrews was written to Hebrews. You're not a Hebrew so just tear that out of your Bible, too.
I swear, the lengths people go through to ignore something that refutes their position is ridiculous.
1 Peter 3I have a slightly different understanding.
In God's Word it says that Christ conquered sin. All of sin. Wiped it out, whipped it fanny.
For both the saved and the unsaved. So Christ did not die for only the sins of the elect/saved. But for both, but one must be saved for their sin to be forgiven.
1 Peter 3:18
For Christ also suffered once for sins, the righteous for the unrighteous, that he might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh but made alive in the spirit,
This is in disagreement with the Calvinist view that Jesus only died for the sins of the elect.
I only quoted 2 Tim. and did not refer to Romans at all, so why are you speaking as though I had?Only teaching that of those who are saved in his letters, they are written to believers are they not?
Your of the opinion then, that all the gentiles are chosen of God to be saved?
Except that it is of these gentiles are some chosen as are some jews, while the rest are blinded.
Example, of 'us whom He called' in v24 are to be shown mercy as vessels of mercy, and Paul is writing this in reference to saved persons, as clearly contrasted with vessels of wrath.
Romans 9:20-24New King James Version (NKJV)
20 But indeed, O man, who are you to reply against God? Will the thing formed say to him who formed it, “Why have you made me like this?” 21 Does not the potter have power over the clay, from the same lump to make one vessel for honor and another for dishonor?
22 What if God, wanting to show His wrath and to make His power known, endured with much longsuffering the vessels of wrath prepared for destruction, 23 and that He might make known the riches of His glory on the vessels of mercy, which He had prepared beforehand for glory, 24 even us whom He called, not of the Jews only, but also of the Gentiles?
So some called, some not called.
No. Where did you get that idea from? The scripture says 'MAY' be saved. In other words the opportunity is equally available to Gentiles as it was/is to Jews.Your of the opinion then, that all the gentiles are chosen of God to be saved?
I will be very plain speaking, those who say a born of God, saved person can lose their salvation are trying to deceive, and are doing Satan's bidding.
You can easily read of how eternal life is everlasting never to perish for those who have it in many scriptures, but 1 John 2:26-27 really nails it again.
If they do not believe what Christ says about never perishing, then they certainly won't believe what His apostles say about abiding in Him.
John declares they will abide in Him since they have an anointing from the Holy One to know all things. What John means is the Holy Spirit teaches you concerning all things you need to know.
If someone does not have the Spirit then they are none of His and will of course depart the faith for demonic doctrine.
For those who do not abide in Him, they are antichrists and are "not of us" and they deny His words, what He said, who He really is and what He does which is save His people from their sins, because He is the Christ of God who takes away your sins so that God will not remember them anymore.
That is what the New Covenant is all about.
10 For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, says the Lord: I will put My laws in their mind and write them on their hearts; and I will be their God, and they shall be My people. 11 None of them shall teach his neighbor, and none his brother, saying, ‘Know the Lord,’ for all shall know Me, from the least of them to the greatest of them. 12 For I will be merciful to their unrighteousness, and their sins and their lawless deeds I will remember no more.”
Deceptions of the Last Hour
18 Little children, it is the last hour; and as you have heard that the Antichrist is coming, even now many antichrists have come, by which we know that it is the last hour. 19 They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would have continued with us; but they went out that they might be made manifest, that none of them were of us.
20 But you have an anointing from the Holy One, and you know all things. 21 I have not written to you because you do not know the truth, but because you know it, and that no lie is of the truth.
22 Who is a liar but he who denies that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist who denies the Father and the Son. 23 Whoever denies the Son does not have the Father either; he who acknowledges the Son has the Father also.
Let Truth Abide in You
24 Therefore let that abide in you which you heard from the beginning. If what you heard from the beginning abides in you, you also will abide in the Son and in the Father. 25 And this is the promise that He has promised us—eternal life.
26 These things I have written to you concerning those who try to deceive you.
27 But the anointing which you have received from Him abides in you, and you do not need that anyone teach you; but as the same anointing teaches you concerning all things, and is true, and is not a lie, and just as it has taught you, you will abide in Him.
Well, then Christ didn't conquer sin and death in your scenario. Maybe you don't think He could.1 Peter 3
[18]Christ suffered for our sins once for all time. He never sinned, but he died for sinners to bring you safely home to God. He suffered physical death, but he was raised to life in the Spirit.
To whom is the "our sins" referring? Was Peter writing to all humanity or to Christians?
I love it when people quote 1 Peter 3 as a free will verse, because the context is exactly the opposite. 1 Peter 3:18 is entirely promoting limited atonement for God's chosen, adopted, children.
Thanks for bringing this up.
I think there it's a modal verb/subjective 'might', rather than the 'if' of doubt.I dunno about that. That He 'might' bring us to God. I'm not so sure about that.
What does Matthew Henry have to say about it?
Well, then Christ didn't conquer sin and death in your scenario. Maybe you don't think He could.
He desires none of the elect to perish.
Context, context, context.
1 Peter 3
[18]Christ suffered for our sins once for all time. He never sinned, but he died for sinners to bring you safely home to God. He suffered physical death, but he was raised to life in the Spirit.
To whom is the "our sins" referring? Was Peter writing to all humanity or to Christians?
I love it when people quote 1 Peter 3 as a free will verse, because the context is exactly the opposite. 1 Peter 3:18 is entirely promoting limited atonement for God's chosen, adopted, children.
Thanks for bringing this up.
Well let's look at this verse closer then.1 Peter 3
[18]Christ suffered for our sins once for all time. He never sinned, but he died for sinners to bring you safely home to God. He suffered physical death, but he was raised to life in the Spirit.
To whom is the "our sins" referring? Was Peter writing to all humanity or to Christians?
I love it when people quote 1 Peter 3 as a free will verse, because the context is exactly the opposite. 1 Peter 3:18 is entirely promoting limited atonement for God's chosen, adopted, children.
Thanks for bringing this up.
See my post above Oz. The Greek clearly agrees with us. Calvinism is WRONG!MennoSota,
The problems with your Calvinistic position include:
However, the possibility of your accepting that three-step view seems to be close to zero from what you've written here.
- Your view contradicts Scripture, 'He is the propitiation for our sins, and not for ours only but also for the sins of the whole world' (1 John 2:2 ESV, emphasis added). So, Christ not only appeases the wrath of God (propitiation) for believers' sins but also 'for the sins of the whole world'. No matter how many twists and turns you give us, you can't get out of John's teaching that Jesus's propitiation is available for the sins of the whole world.
- This does not teach universalism, but demonstrates the availability of God's propitiatory sacrifice (with the accompanying forgiveness-repentance) for all sinners in the entire world.
- This highlights the Calvinistic brick wall that God can appease his wrath against ALL sinners through Christ's atonement, make salvation available to all (John 3:16), but individuals need to do as the Philippian jailer had to do in response to the message preached by Paul and Silas, 'Believe in the Lord Jesus, and you will be saved, you and your household'.
You state the exact problem with your argument: 'If God had atoned for all humanity and yet the majority go to hell, then either God is weak or He is unjust in condemning people for whom the price has been paid'.
This view is shipwrecked on the biblical grounds of God's providing atonement for all and the Gospel of 'whoever believes shall be saved'.
Can't you see that it is Calvinism that provides the insurmountable leap that is needed to avoided the exact teaching of Scripture? I am open to listening to your argument for this limited atonement view, but it crashes on the rocks of Scripture (1 John 2:2).
Oz
Where do you see that God was pleased? Where do you see that Cyrus' intentions were to glorify God?I'm afraid you will have to answer that question with more than a simple, no.
It seems to me that God was pleased when Cyrus believed God and obeyed him. What tells you that God was not pleased?
Scripture speaks of the elect. Peter addressed the elect. Context matters. Skala has explained it quite well in numerous posts. No need to add to that.Then, from where did 'of the elect' come?
Contrare. He absolutely took God's wrath for the sins of God's children. He has ensured that not one of God's adopted children will be lost.
If God had atoned for all humanity and yet the majority go to hell, then either God is weak or He is unjust in condemning people for whom the price has been paid.
Since God atoned only for His chosen adopted children, He is neither weak, nor unjust. Instead, He displays grace and mercy upon whom He wills. (Read Romans 9)