Yes, the way atoms worked back then was completely different, but everything worked pretty much the same as it does today. *Rolls eyes*
In some cases, possibly an element could have changed radically, because as we know, one electron proton or something can make the difference between say, gold, and mercury etc. In most cases though one suspects, that the changes did not radically change elements.
So you are guessing again?
You would need to know what the former forces and laws were to be able to determine that!
I find it quite amusing that you have created a reputation on this site as someone who claims the laws were different in the past - and yet you can't give us any details at all about what the differences were!
One example, at a larger level might be the planets and moon. If gravity was different in some way, or even if it was the same more or less, but there was another force that balanced or countered gravity, we could have the moon or planets closer or further in the past. Who knows?
And more amusing that you claim there were differences, and then invent imaginary things to counteract those differences so that everything still worked the same as it does today. Even you realise that the world described in the Bible before the flood was pretty much the same as the world is today.
After all, there was a lot of activity in the solar system, with a lot of debris flying around, so maybe some of that could have been due to a big change and movement?!
Except present state laws model that early solar system quite nicely. No need for a DSP there!
Ha! Well, we only started eating meat after the flood probably, as did most animals!
Yes, I'm sure mosquitoes were vegetarians.
In the future, lions will eat grass, so another change is on the way!
Yeah, more guessing. You have no evidence of this whatsoever.
Whatever the atomic realities were in the former state, and what effect they had on food, was all perfectly planned.
You need to realise that simply making claims like this is not going to convince me. I'm not going to say, "Well, maybe I'll believe it, since Dad seems to know what he is talking about." Primarily because you have demonstrated many times that you do not know what you are talking about, and all you are doing is repeating your ideas about the Bible.
For the bible to be true, it seems to me we need really big changes to account for the many many centuries we used to live, and the different diet, and different way plants grew very fast etc.
Then maybe the Bible is NOT true. *GASP!*
Flattery will get you everywhere
*Sighs and shakes head*
Not a stronger bond under present laws.
I thought it was quite clear that we were talking about your supposed DSP laws.
Did you forget what we were talking about again?
You should remember that the forces like the strong and weak nuclear forces ..spin..etc all determine what atoms do. Yes, chemical reactions could have been different in many cases. After all, if radioactive decay did not exist as we now it now, that involves a lot more than just a couple of atoms being attracted more or less to each other.
Then the way the universe operated back then would have been even more different! The more changes, the more differences we would expect to see! So why then were the people back then the same as us? Two arms, two legs, standing upright, blood pumped by a heart, food digested by enzymes... How do you even know that enzymes existed back then if the laws were so different?
Since the change would have been made by the creator, there was no chance involved. No luck. No accidents. God knew exactly what needed to be done and what needed to remain somewhat the same.
Once again, your claims by themselves are not enough to come close to making a decent argument.
