OzSpen
Regular Member
- Oct 15, 2005
- 11,553
- 709
- Country
- Australia
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Private
Here is a rebuttal.
https://www.monergism.com/thethreshold/articles/onsite/newbirth2.html
Important note: Some who oppose the biblical teaching on monergistic regeneration will argue that this cannot be true because no one can be regenerate and not saved. If regeneration precedes faith, they reason, then there is a time, be it ever so short, where one is regenerate but does not yet believe. But this is to misunderstand what regeneration precedes faith actually means. It does not temporally precede faith but rather causally. What do I mean? An example would be one pool ball striking another. Does one ball temporally strike the other first. No they both hit one another simultaneously ... YET the one which rolls has causal priority. The same could be said of heat and fire. Likewise when God, the Holy Spirit, through the preaching of the word, opens our heart to the gospel and gives us new eyes to see the beauty, truth and excellency of Christ, our response is immediate.
"No sooner is the soul quickened, than it at once discovers its lost estate, is horrified thereat, looks for a refuge, and believing Christ to be a suitable one, flies to him and reposes in him."
-C.H. Spurgeon
"Faith in the living God and his Son Jesus Christ is always the result of the new birth, and can never exist except in the regenerate. Whoever has faith is a saved man."
C.H. Spurgeon
SD,
The problem with your response is that it is a red herring logical fallacy. It does not deal with the content of what I wrote (and you back-quoted) at #77. Doing a copy and paste from another site does not provide a response to my post.
If that's the best you can do, we have no further point of dialogue. That's what the use of fallacious reasoning (logical fallacies) does. It prevents continuation of responsible discussion.
Oz
Upvote
0