Is there any evidence for evolution?

[doubtingmerle]

Yes, there is.

 

[AV1611VET]

Only on paper.

 

[JackRT]

Only on paper.

Ha! Welcome back AV.

 

[AV1611VET]

Ha! Welcome back AV.

Thank you, my friend!

 

[MissRowy]

Any longer and CF would have crashed without you man. You add something different to these forums

 

[AdamSK]

Only on paper.

And in the ground, in the lab, in living cells, in every ecosystem on the planet...

 

[Nicky Blass]

Scientists all over the world rely on the fact that there is evidence for evolution.

Religious fundamentalism, bitter partisan politics and poor science education have all contributed to this denial of evolution in the US, says Jon Miller of Michigan State University in East Lansing, who conducted the survey with his colleagues. “The US is the only country in which [the teaching of evolution] has been politicised,” he says. “Republicans have clearly adopted this as one of their wedge issues. In most of the world, this is a non-issue.”
Amen.

 

[AdamSK]

Creationism is only seen as a viable issue in certain states. The RNC is blessedly silent on the subject.

 

[AV1611VET]

And in the ground, in the lab, in living cells, in every ecosystem on the planet...

Those speak of micro evolution, not macro.

Macro evolution requires deep time; something the Bible doesn't account for.

 

[AV1611VET]

Creationism is only seen as a viable issue in certain states. The RNC is blessedly silent on the subject.

Politics can take a hike.

 

[lesliedellow]

Of course there isn't any evidence for evolution. That's why 99.9999% of biologists believe it is true.

 

[Nicky Blass]

Macro evolution requires deep time; something the Bible doesn't account for.

The fact that evolution requires time should tell you something about the Bible.

 

[Nicky Blass]

Of course there isn't any evidence for evolution. That's why 99.9999% of biologists believe it is true.

Even the majority of Christians accept that evolution is true.

 

[AV1611VET]

The fact that evolution requires time should tell you something about the Bible.

Methinks you have the cart before the horse.

 

[AV1611VET]

Even the majority of Christians accept that evolution is true.

The majority of Christians don't believe in verbal plenary inspiration.

 

[lesliedellow]

Methinks you have the cart before the horse.

"The question of the antiquity of man has of itself no theological significance. It is to theology, as such, a matter of entire indifference how long man has existed on earth."

Or so says that incorrigible liberal, B B Warfield.

 

[AV1611VET]

"The question of the antiquity of man has of itself no theological significance. It is to theology, as such, a matter of entire indifference how long man has existed on earth."

Or so says that incorrigible liberal, B B Warfield.

B B Warfield is in aitch.

 

[AdamSK]

Those speak of micro evolution, not macro.

Macro evolution requires deep time; something the Bible doesn't account for.

Just like cars on the interstate just travel between exits, not across the country.

 

[lesliedellow]

B B Warfield is in aitch.

There is something wrong with your soteriology. Back to theological college for you.

 

[Nicky Blass]

The majority of Christians don't believe in verbal plenary inspiration.

They can 'believe' what they like but evolution is a fact, we are here as we are because of evolution.