• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

POLL: Which of these elements of the creation story do you believe?

POLL: Which of the following do you accept?


  • Total voters
    99
  • This poll will close: .

rakovsky

Newbie
Apr 8, 2004
2,552
558
Pennsylvania
✟82,685.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Question too hard for you?
So that is how you deal with Poll Option#1?
This is what is happening. Rather than face truth head on and take the Bible at its word on the waters above the firmament, instead accusing others of reintepreting the meaning wrongly to conform to their own understanding of nature, ... sad.
 
Upvote 0

mark kennedy

Natura non facit saltum
Site Supporter
Mar 16, 2004
22,030
7,265
62
Indianapolis, IN
✟594,630.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
So that is how you deal with Poll Option#1?
This is what is happening. Rather than face truth head on and take the Bible at its word on the waters above the firmament, instead accusing others of reintepreting the meaning wrongly to conform to their own understanding of nature, ... sad.

Why don't you answer the question?
 
Upvote 0

mark kennedy

Natura non facit saltum
Site Supporter
Mar 16, 2004
22,030
7,265
62
Indianapolis, IN
✟594,630.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
You are changing the question.
Do you accept waters above the heavens?

I'm asking a real question, do you believe in the miracles of the Bible? What is so hard about that?
 
Upvote 0

Hoghead1

Well-Known Member
Oct 27, 2015
4,911
741
78
✟8,968.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
It was about social Darwinism.
No, it definitely was not. Scopes was accused of teaching evolution in a biology class. The irony o f this is that Scopes was a phys. ed. instructor who really didn't know anything at all about evolution, was just subbing that day, and the students really couldn't demonstrate they had heard anything about evolution. Nevertheless, Scopes was found guilty and fined.
 
Upvote 0

mark kennedy

Natura non facit saltum
Site Supporter
Mar 16, 2004
22,030
7,265
62
Indianapolis, IN
✟594,630.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
No, it definitely was not. Scopes was accused of teaching evolution in a biology class. The irony o f this is that Scopes was a phys. ed. instructor who really didn't know anything at all about evolution, was just subbing that day, and the students really couldn't demonstrate they had heard anything about evolution. Nevertheless, Scopes was found guilty and fined.

Which was appealed and now Creation as an historical event is barred in the US public schools because it's religious. Do you believe in the miracles of the Bible?
 
Upvote 0

StanJ

Student & Correct Handler of God's Word.
May 3, 2016
1,767
287
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
✟3,516.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Single
Politics
CA-Liberals
I think you didn't quite get my point. I was basically asking What if the rotation of the earth sped up so that a full rotation was 23 hours instead of 24, eg. 11.5 hours of darkness and 11.5 hours of daylight?

I don't live in a world of what-ifs and neither do you.

Check this out:
http://www.timeanddate.com/time/earth-rotation.html
Do you realize the implications?
What a "day" means in terms of physical length does not mean necessarily something that can be measured by a physical stopwatch. This debunks the assumption that days in Genesis 1 must be exactly 24 hours measureable by a watch.
The rotation of darkness and light in Genesis 1 is what determines a day night cycle in that chapter, not somebody holding a watch!

I learned this in grade school when I asked why we have February 29th every four years. Just nothing new they have no idea how you can actually make it into something that it's not. This doesn't debunk anything at least not in those who deal in reality. Nobody has claimed that the days in Genesis 1 are exactly 24 hours and if you think that they do then you've obviously not been paying attention to what's being posted here especially by me. Yes Darkness and Light day and night is what determines a day. Not 1,000 years unless you figure 500 years are in darkness and 500 years are in light? Are you for real?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

StanJ

Student & Correct Handler of God's Word.
May 3, 2016
1,767
287
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
✟3,516.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Single
Politics
CA-Liberals
I don't agree. I don't think Moses wrote any of it. Too many contradictions and very bumpy literary style.
Well then you're disagreeing with Jesus himself who said and quoted the written law of Moses. Where do you find the written laws?
I suggest you read through all the gospel to see how many times Jesus attributed the Torah to Moses.
 
Upvote 0

StanJ

Student & Correct Handler of God's Word.
May 3, 2016
1,767
287
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
✟3,516.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Single
Politics
CA-Liberals
So far, only about 10% of the people in the poll are choosing the option for waters resting above the heavens.
People have a habit to conform the verse to their own understanding and read it as if it was talking about the clouds that are in the sky, not "above the heavens" like the Bible says.

I think your biggest problem is that you read the King James version without the understanding of Elizabeth English. I suggest you pick up a Modern English version and reread Gen 1:6-8 (NIV)
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

StanJ

Student & Correct Handler of God's Word.
May 3, 2016
1,767
287
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
✟3,516.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Single
Politics
CA-Liberals
So that is how you deal with Poll Option#1?
This is what is happening. Rather than face truth head on and take the Bible at its word on the waters above the firmament, instead accusing others of reintepreting the meaning wrongly to conform to their own understanding of nature, ... sad.
The firmament is properly translated in Modern English as 'sky', so yes I agree with question number 1. Who goes around calling Sky firmament these days except for those looking to equivocate about the wording.
 
Upvote 0

Hoghead1

Well-Known Member
Oct 27, 2015
4,911
741
78
✟8,968.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
I don't live in a world of what-ifs and neither do you.



I learn this in grade school when I asked why we have February 29th every four years. Just nothing new they have no idea how you can actually make it into something that it's not. This doesn't debunk anything at least not in those who deal in reality. Nobody has claimed that the days in Genesis 1 are exactly 24 hours and if you think that they do then you've obviously not been paying attention to what's being posted here especially by me. Yes Darkness and Light day and night is what determines a day. Not 1,000 years unless you figure 500 years are in darkness and 500 years are in light? Are you for real?
Apparently, you haven't been paying attention to anything being posted here, especially by me. Yes, I do think a 24-hour day is what is intended. I think the author, The P source, intended gen. 1 to be used as part of a liturgy. Its purpose was to combat polytheism, specifically the notion that each day of the week is o be devoted to a different God. Instead, the message here is that we should all worship the same God every day. Hence, the account encompasses a week, seven days.
 
Upvote 0

mark kennedy

Natura non facit saltum
Site Supporter
Mar 16, 2004
22,030
7,265
62
Indianapolis, IN
✟594,630.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Apparently, you haven't been paying attention to anything being posted here, especially by me. Yes, I do think a 24-hour day is what is intended. I think the author, The P source, intended gen. 1 to be used as part of a liturgy. Its purpose was to combat polytheism, specifically the notion that each day of the week is o be devoted to a different God. Instead, the message here is that we should all worship the same God every day. Hence, the account encompasses a week, seven days.

You mean Moses.
 
Upvote 0

StanJ

Student & Correct Handler of God's Word.
May 3, 2016
1,767
287
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
✟3,516.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Single
Politics
CA-Liberals
Apparently, you haven't been paying attention to anything being posted here, especially by me. Yes, I do think a 24-hour day is what is intended. I think the author, The P source, intended gen. 1 to be used as part of a liturgy. Its purpose was to combat polytheism, specifically the notion that each day of the week is o be devoted to a different God. Instead, the message here is that we should all worship the same God every day. Hence, the account encompasses a week, seven days.

Well you're right, as I just joined yesterday and answered the POLL. I've only been responding to those who responded to me. This isn't an issue I really need to study up on. You're quoting my response to recovsky so what exactly were you hoping for?

Gen 1 is a historical account of how God created the universe. Regardless of whether or not polytheism existed at the time Moses wrote it down, it was inspired to show the chosen people of God who God was and where they came from.
 
Upvote 0