"Super14LDS, post: 69544001, member: 386231"]The Strength of Our Position... ...It really is one or the other when it comes down to authority. It either continued through the apostles to the modern day or it was lost when they died...:
You seem to consistently harp on this one Catholic scholar (who is never named) to justify shoring up this belief in your church's imagined authority an awful lot. Please consider the alternative: one man's opinion, who just so happens to be a scholar, does not a truism make. Maybe only to you. Not to everyone else. Scholars opinions have been found to be off the mark.
I vote for "the other" in this case, where spiritual authority becomes essentially an attempt at power grabbing through falsified means:
As far as spiritual authority being "handed off" through the Apostles "only", if this was what Jesus authorized, why did the Apostle Peter (and the Apostle John) claim that God made ALL believers in Jesus Christ priests (1 Peter 2:4-10; Rev.1:6)? Was Peter in error? Why did Jesus command ALL believers to go into the world to preach the Gospel (Matthew 28:19) if He didn't intend to give these "disciples" His power and authority to do so? (Nobody dispenses their power and authority to someone without first giving them an office.) You would think, if Jesus instructed churches to continue to appoint Apostles after the original ones died off (knowing they would), at least SOME churches would have done so (being instructed by the Apostles themselves to do so). But none did (except the EO). Why? They ALL understood that ALL believers are made priests, holding the authority and power of Jesus Christ Himself. Not just mere "Apostle power".
The LDS is instructed to believer otherwise, through some contrived, non-historical "restoration" project only they can participate in, under their rules. How convenient that unique interpretation is. For them.
1 Peter 2:9. But you are a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people of His own, so that you may proclaim the virtues of the One who called you out of darkness into His marvelous light.
Apostle: noun, 1. any of the early followers of Jesus who carried the Christian message into the world. 2. (sometimes initial capital letter) any of the original 12 disciples called by Jesus to preach the Gospel: Peter, James, John, Andrew, Philip, Bartholomew, Matthew, Thomas, James, Thaddaeus, Simon, Judas Iscariot.
"You": the “elect resident aliens” scattered throughout Asia Minor. In other words saved believers in Jesus Christ. They could not have been Levite priests, being referred to as a group of "strangers"--who believe in Jesus Christ, nullifying their Jewish office--cobbled together for protection against Roman persecution of Christians (not Jews). Formerly they had not received mercy (implying Gentiles), but now they had, through faith in Jesus Christ.
Peter: A indisputable Jew, who knew without question what a priest, their authority, and their duties were. There could be no misunderstanding or misconception on Peter's part what or who he meant here.
Priest: All priests are divinely appointed by God, and are all given the same, equal authority. If Peter is considered "a man" in this verse, why would he claim such a 'lie', being an Apostle and a Jew?
Related verses:
Revelation 1:5, 6. ...and from Jesus Christ – the faithful Witness, the Firstborn from among the dead, the ruler over the kings of the earth. To the One who loves us and has set us free from our sins at the cost of His own blood, has appointed us as a kingdom, as priests serving his God and Father – to Him be the glory and the power for ever and ever!
[There's another Apostle claiming ALL believers in Jesus Christ are "priests"!]
Isaiah 61:6. But you shall be named priests of the Lord; men shall call you ministers of our God.
No wonder why the official LDS manual on 1 Peter 2:9 COMPLETELY skips around the "royal priesthood" bit.