What is the greatest evidence against the theory of evolution...?

[bhsmte]

Exactly.
You have just successfully copped out.
Congratulations.

For it to be a cop out, you would first need to present evidence.

 

[Neogaia777]

What supernatural?

The "supernatural" may turn out to be perfectly natural untapped human ability, in the future...

 

[Hieronymus]

The "supernatural" may turn out to be perfectly natural untapped human ability, in the future...

New Age..

 

[Neogaia777]

New Age..

Can you deny that their on to something?

 

[Hieronymus]

Can you deny that their on to something?

Theyŕe on to theosophy, a.k.a. Luciferianism.
It's the attractive suggestion of the serpent, just like in Genesis 3.
Shockingly, very little has changed...

 

[Loudmouth]

Exactly.
You have just successfully copped out.
Congratulations.

Asking for evidence of the supernatural is copping out?

The only cop out appears to be those who can't back up their claims with evidence.

 

[joshua 1 9]

Nope, it's just you that doesn't get it.

If your talking about atheist then you are right I just don't get it. Because it does not make any sense at all.

 

[Loudmouth]

If your talking about atheist then you are right I just don't get it. Because it does not make any sense at all.

Heliocentrism didn't make sense to the Pope.

 

[joshua 1 9]

Heliocentrism didn't make sense to the Pope.

I am not going to put any effort into trying to figure out what your point might be. The Catholic church does just fine when it comes to science. There is no problem there at all. Those guys are pretty well educated in that regard.

 

[Loudmouth]

I am not going to put any effort into trying to figure out what your point might be. The Catholic church does just fine when it comes to science.

Galileo would disagree.

 

[Hieronymus]

Asking for evidence of the supernatural is copping out?

Copping out of the cop out....

 

[Loudmouth]

Copping out of the cop out....

Asking for evidence is not a cop out. Making empty assertions and refusing to present evidence is a cop out.

Do you really think an unbiased position is one where you just assume that assertions are true without any evidence to back them?

 

[PsychoSarah]

If your talking about atheist then you are right I just don't get it. Because it does not make any sense at all.

Consider this to help you understand. Whatever experiences amounted to you being a theist, atheists must either have perceived such experiences differently than you did, or not had them at all. For example, I wasn't indoctrinated as a child, and most theists are to some extent. If you told the story of Santa Claus to someone who had never heard it that was an adult, they'd be far less likely to believe it than a child told the story for the first time.

Also, if you do experience a conversation with another being when you pray, I have never experienced that while praying. Not once.

 

[Neogaia777]

What about Egyptian chariot wheels found on the bottom of the Red Sea? Or the Dead Sea Scrolls, before they found them, people thought the copies that they had then were so accurate that doubters and non-believers concluded that they had to be written after the fact, then the Dead Sea Scrolls were found and shattered that, but what happened to the belief of the accuracy of the writings?

God Bless!

 

[46AND2]

What about Egyptian chariot wheels found on the bottom of the Red Sea?

They weren't. Ron Wyatt is a crackpot, and even most Christian organizations advise to avoid him. Seriously, read up on him.

 

[Loudmouth]

What about Egyptian chariot wheels found on the bottom of the Red Sea?

Ron Wyatt is widely regarded as a charlatan, even among Christians. This is a good article about Ron Wyatt written by a Christian as a warning to other Christians:

"One of the individuals who I interviewed, who lost approximately 30,000 thousand dollars to Ron Wyatt, went to Israel with him, supposedly to see some of these sights and record them on film. An assignment editor of a major television station in Nasheville went with them. Not only did this individual not see any of these incredible discoveries, but his wife was told by one of Ron Wyatt's sons that the chariot wheels that Ron supposedly discovered in the Gulf of Aqaba were planted there by Ron. Mr. Wyatt gave this couple some coins which he supposedly found at the Ark of the Covenant site. Again, one of Wyatt's sons informed the wife that Wyatt bought those coins. Gentle, soft-spoken Ron verbally abused an Arab car rental agent when the agent told Mr. Wyatt that his son was to young to drive the vehicle."
http://www.tentmaker.org/Dew/Dew7/D7-AGreatChristianScam.html

Or the Dead Sea Scrolls, before they found them, people thought the copies that they had then were so accurate that doubters and non-believers concluded that they had to be written after the fact, then the Dead Sea Scrolls were found and shattered that, but what happened to the belief of the accuracy of the writings?

There are written religious myths that predate the Dead Sea scrolls. For example, we have a copy of the Enuma Elis from
7th century BC. It is 400 years older than the Dead Sea scrolls, so does that make the Enuma Elis more accurate than the Dead Sea scrolls? We can still find accurate copies of Don Quixote centuries later. Does that mean the stories in those books are true?

 

[Neogaia777]

They weren't. Ron Wyatt is a crackpot, and even most Christian organizations advise to avoid him. Seriously, read up on him.

OK, Thanks,

God Bless!

 

[AV1611VET]

What about Egyptian chariot wheels found on the bottom of the Red Sea?

I love what my pulpit-pounding preacher said about that.

He mentioned that in one of his sermons on Moses crossing the Red Sea, but he stipulated:

"They claim to have found chariot wheels on the bottom of the Red Sea ... not that we require evidence, though. We walk by faith. After all, the Bible says it, and that's good enough for us."

 

[SepiaAndDust]

Or the Dead Sea Scrolls, before they found them, people thought the copies that they had then were so accurate that doubters and non-believers concluded that they had to be written after the fact, then the Dead Sea Scrolls were found and shattered that, but what happened to the belief of the accuracy of the writings?

I'm not sure what you're talking about here.

 

[SteveB28]

It is a well established fact in biology that organisms can adapt to their environment, it s sometimes referred to as "micro-evolution", which is not accurate, because it doesn't involve mutations.
Sure, species can go extinct or be decimated.

Could you please outline the mechanism by which some adult humans are tolerant to lactose, while others are not?