• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

The Moral Argument

Status
Not open for further replies.

Nihilist Virus

Infectious idea
Oct 24, 2015
4,940
1,251
41
California
✟156,979.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Good point. Do you think it is murder?

Fair enough. Do you think it is immoral to artificially inseminate horses?


Ok, so do you think it is immoral to make horses slaves?

I've answered your questions, please answer mine.
 
Upvote 0

Oncedeceived

Senior Veteran
Jul 11, 2003
21,214
629
✟66,870.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Are you saying that because God is a different or higher species, he may slaughter us for his own amusement?
Yes and no. Yes, God is different but no He is not a higher species as God is not created. God enacts judgement against evil.
 
Upvote 0

Oncedeceived

Senior Veteran
Jul 11, 2003
21,214
629
✟66,870.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
It is immoral to kill anything unless doing so is vital to your own survival. Doesn't everyone know this?
What does survival have to do with raping horses or making horses slaves have with killing? You ignore two examples and focus on the one and really don't answer at all.
 
Upvote 0

Nihilist Virus

Infectious idea
Oct 24, 2015
4,940
1,251
41
California
✟156,979.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
What does survival have to do with raping horses or making horses slaves have with killing? You ignore two examples and focus on the one and really don't answer at all.

It's immoral to harm something if it does not pertain to your survival.
 
Upvote 0

Oncedeceived

Senior Veteran
Jul 11, 2003
21,214
629
✟66,870.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Yes. Now, was it immoral for the Jews to slaughter villages and take the virgins for themselves as wives?
Yes, it was moral for Jews to slaughter those who had slaughtered them. It was moral for the Jews to take the women and care for them and take them for wives. The reason it was moral was that they had no way to make a life on their own. They were taken in and made wives not slaves. They were given at least a month to mourn and I imagine even longer if they needed it before they were married. They had all the same rights as any other wife in the Jewish community.
 
Upvote 0

Nihilist Virus

Infectious idea
Oct 24, 2015
4,940
1,251
41
California
✟156,979.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Yes, it was moral for Jews to slaughter those who had slaughtered them. It was moral for the Jews to take the women and care for them and take them for wives. The reason it was moral was that they had no way to make a life on their own. They were taken in and made wives not slaves. They were given at least a month to mourn and I imagine even longer if they needed it before they were married. They had all the same rights as any other wife in the Jewish community.

I'm not talking about the ones who had slaughtered them, and in fact I don't even know what you're referring to there. I'm talking about the instances where they are the aggressors all the way, where they sack the city, and either kill everything in it or take the virgins as wives. That is what I was referring to. Is that morally acceptable?
 
Upvote 0

Oncedeceived

Senior Veteran
Jul 11, 2003
21,214
629
✟66,870.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I'm not talking about the ones who had slaughtered them, and in fact I don't even know what you're referring to there. I'm talking about the instances where they are the aggressors all the way, where they sack the city, and either kill everything in it or take the virgins as wives. That is what I was referring to. Is that morally acceptable?
Provide the passages that you are referring to.
 
Upvote 0

Nihilist Virus

Infectious idea
Oct 24, 2015
4,940
1,251
41
California
✟156,979.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Provide the passages that you are referring to.

Why, so you can move the goalposts afterwards? That's not how this works. You have to commit to a moral stance now and then we test the Bible to see if it is compatible with what you consider to be morally correct.
 
Upvote 0

bhsmte

Newbie
Apr 26, 2013
52,761
11,792
✟254,941.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Why, so you can move the goalposts afterwards? That's not how this works. You have to commit to a moral stance now and then we test the Bible to see if it is compatible with what you consider to be morally correct.

Good luck, getting a straight answer to your question.
 
Upvote 0

Oncedeceived

Senior Veteran
Jul 11, 2003
21,214
629
✟66,870.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Why, so you can move the goalposts afterwards? That's not how this works. You have to commit to a moral stance now and then we test the Bible to see if it is compatible with what you consider to be morally correct.
I don't remember them attacking anyone first. If you do then present it.
 
Upvote 0

quatona

"God"? What do you mean??
May 15, 2005
37,512
4,302
✟190,302.00
Faith
Seeker
I don't remember them attacking anyone first. If you do then present it.
Here´s just one example of many:
Thus saith the LORD of hosts ... go and smite Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass.
I have problems imagining that they had been attacked by those women, infants and sucklings first.
I also see a subtle difference between "slaying" and "marrying" a woman.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.