• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

7 year peace treaty, what 7 year peace treaty?

Hank77

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 26, 2015
26,642
15,693
✟1,219,437.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
They never fully expelled the peoples who lived there, nor took over the entire territory.
Jos 21:44 and Jehovah giveth rest to them round about, according to all that which He hath sworn to their fathers, and there hath not stood a man in their presence of all their enemies, the whole of their enemies hath Jehovah given into their hand;

God did His part, He did what He said He would do. He never said He would MAKE them be obedient. They had to choose.
And of the land they conquered, God actually reduced their territory on account of their rebellion (e.g., 2 Kings 10:32).
Yup, God didn't say they would keep the land if they were disobedient, did He?
Jos 23:11 and ye have been very watchful for yourselves to love Yehovah your God.
Jos 23:12 `But--if ye at all turn back and have cleaved to the remnant of these nations, these who are left with you, and intermarried with them, and gone in to them, and they to you,
Jos 23:13 know certainly that Yehovah your God is not continuing to dispossess these nations from before you, and they have been to you for a gin,......
 
Upvote 0

Douggg

anytime rapture, non-dispensationalist, futurist
May 28, 2009
29,927
3,557
Non-dispensationalist
✟411,188.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
You keep acting as if you don't know what the issue is. Every time I make a point, you come back with some off the wall statement. I do not need to find anything. You are the one who had never heard of an appositive clause, which you keep denying every time you post.
My last post to you was responding to a point you made saying.... "All the examples from all the links you posted used phrases."

To which I responded and showed the examples contained clauses, not phrases.
 
Upvote 0

Luke17:37

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2016
1,668
550
United States
✟19,666.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Jos 21:44 and Jehovah giveth rest to them round about, according to all that which He hath sworn to their fathers, and there hath not stood a man in their presence of all their enemies, the whole of their enemies hath Jehovah given into their hand;

God did His part, He did what He said He would do. He never said He would MAKE them be obedient. They had to choose.

Yup, God didn't say they would keep the land if they were disobedient, did He?
Jos 23:11 and ye have been very watchful for yourselves to love Yehovah your God.
Jos 23:12 `But--if ye at all turn back and have cleaved to the remnant of these nations, these who are left with you, and intermarried with them, and gone in to them, and they to you,
Jos 23:13 know certainly that Yehovah your God is not continuing to dispossess these nations from before you, and they have been to you for a gin,......

You use this verse but there are many others that suggest this verse doesn't mean what you think it means. The Abrahamic land covenant was never fulfilled. They never had full possession from the wadi of Egypt to the River Euphrates. Ever. The promise to bring them into the land was fulfilled, but not to full extent of the covenant. Just as the promise of the Savior was fulfilled by Jesus, the covenant of the land, according to the borders God proclaimed, will be realized by Jesus when He returns to thresh His land. Also, Sinai was conditional on their behavior, but this covenant had nothing to do with behavior. It was an unconditional covenant that God Himself cut. So God will not forsake His covenant on the basis of Israel's behavior.

It looks like we are just going to disagree.
 
Upvote 0

precepts

Newbie
Aug 20, 2008
3,094
135
57
United States Virgin Islands
✟24,096.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Hi precepts,

Thanks for your response. I'm not sure I follow your reasoning. Correct me if I'm wrong, please. You're saying that Jesus is the 'he' who will confirm a covenant, put an end to sacrifice and offering and at the temple set up an abomination that causes desolation - until the end 'that is decreed is poured out on him'. Right?
I must assume you're acting the fool posting the highlighted text because it's not in the post you are replying to nor is it in Dan 9:27.


You support this understanding as being confirmed by the vision that Daniel describes in chapter 8, right? The vision that Daniel describes in chapter 8 is of a goat who comes against the ram and tramples him mercilessly and we are told that no one could save the ram from the goat's onslaught.

Then the goat produces a series of horns, and out of one those horns comes another smaller horn which rises to power in both the south and the east and even towards the 'Beautiful' land. This small, but now great, horn then threw down some of the starry host of heaven and set itself up to be 'as great as the commander of the army of the Lord'. It then takes away the daily sacrifice 'from the Lord' and throws down his sanctuary. Then we are told that because of rebellion, the Lord's people and the daily sacrifice were given over to 'him'.

Then a voice asks how long it will be before 'these' things are fulfilled and lists off what 'things'. The vision concerning the daily sacrifice, the 'rebellion' that causes desolation, the surrender of the sanctuary and the trampling underfoot of the Lord's people.

So, the vision in chapter 8 mentions the same events as the ones happening in the final week of Daniel's 70 sevens, but I'm surely not convinced that the 'it' who will be causing the things in the vision and the 'he' who will be causing the exact same things in the final week is a reference to Jesus.
When did I say chapter 8 referenced Christ? The saga continues.


Ah, but God gives an interpretation of the vision. An angel of the Lord tells Daniel that the vision is concerning the time of the end, the days of wrath. Then the angel goes on to explain that the ram's horns are the kings of Media and Persia. He tells him that the goat is the king of Greece and it's large horn represents the first king of Greece. The four horns that appear represent four kingdoms that will emerge from Greece, but have no power. Finally, we are told that in the later part of the reign of these kingdoms - when 'rebels' (those would be those in rebellion to God) have become completely wicked, a fierce looking king, a master of intrigue will arise. This fierce master of intrigue will become very strong - but not by his own power - and will cause astounding devastation. Succeeding at everything he does and destroy the 'holy' people.

He will cause deceit to prosper and consider himself superior (sounds like Mr. Trump to me. LOL!), and when the people are feeling secure, he will destroy many and take a stand against the 'Prince of princes' (who might that be?). However, he will be destroyed, but not by human endeavor.

Finally, Daniel is told to seal up the vision as it concerns things that will happen in the 'distant' future.

Now, we know that Daniel wrote down the prophecy and so not making it known must not be what is meant by 'seal' up the prophecy. What might that mean?
I could answer both your questions, but if you can't get who does the abomination from because of the overspreading of abominations, "he" causes it to cease, I don't think you would understand.


However, back to the discussion at hand. Your position is that both of these people being discussed in this and the following prophecy of the 70 sevens, is Jesus. Is that correct?
What both people?



BTW, one last note. You say that 490 years from the issuing of the decree to restore and rebuild Jerusalem does not lead to any period within the A.D. accounting of years, right?
Left.


Cyrus never issued a decree to restore and rebuild the city. His decree was to rebuild the 'house of God', the temple, if you will. It was Artaxerxes who issued a decree to Nehemiah to rebuild the city. That is believed to have been in 444 B.C. Yes, if one begins with the wrong date, one will end with the wrong date.
You people call yourselves religious, but you don't have a clue. Did I not point out nehem--h's building lasted only 52 days? How could he have built the city in 52 days?

If only you people would read instead of repeating what you've been told without researching it. All the information is there. Nehem--h left the presence of Artaxerxes in the king's 20th year of reign and completed the rebuilding of the wall in the "troublous times," as prophesied in the 70wks prophecy, in 52 days after he left Persia.

Do you realize 445 bc is 94 solar yrs from Israel's return?


It is absolutely true that you can lead a horse to water, but that you can't make the horse drink. One should also be mindful that God has used an ass before to open eyes.

God bless you.
In Christ, Ted
And some people just try to play the role. LOL!

This was pointed out on another thread where some here on this thread have knowledge of it but choose to still ignore the fact.

"Isa 44:28 That saith of Cyrus, He is my shepherd, and shall perform all my pleasure: even saying to Jerusalem, Thou shalt be built; and to the temple, Thy foundation shall be laid."

"Isa 45:1 Thus saith the LORD to his anointed, to Cyrus, whose right hand I have holden, to subdue nations before him; and I will loose the loins of kings, to open before him the two leaved gates; and the gates shall not be shut;
-----------------------------------
Isa 45:13 I have raised him up in righteousness, and I will direct all his ways: he shall build my city, and he shall let go my captives, not for price nor reward, saith the LORD of hosts."

slap.jpeg
Right!
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

precepts

Newbie
Aug 20, 2008
3,094
135
57
United States Virgin Islands
✟24,096.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
My last post to you was responding to a point you made saying.... "All the examples from all the links you posted used phrases."

To which I responded and showed the examples contained clauses, not phrases.
For the umpteenth time, I am asking you to show me an example, from a link, that uses independent clauses as a list after a colon because I don't think that is what they meant by a list after a colon.

lycnch.jpeg
Lions.jpg
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Hank77

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 26, 2015
26,642
15,693
✟1,219,437.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
You use this verse but there are many others that suggest this verse doesn't mean what you think it means. The Abrahamic land covenant was never fulfilled. They never had full possession from the wadi of Egypt to the River Euphrates. Ever.
Would you give me a couple of scriptures that support the view you have stated? Thanks.
 
Upvote 0

Luke17:37

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2016
1,668
550
United States
✟19,666.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
  • Like
Reactions: Hank77
Upvote 0

BABerean2

Newbie
Site Supporter
May 21, 2014
20,614
7,484
North Carolina
✟916,165.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
But God has never fulfilled it once. And every promise and covenant concerning this earth will be fulfilled before this earth passes away. I am not in error.

Galatians 3:16 is about the fulfillment of the promise in Genesis 22:18, NOT the fulfillment of Genesis 15:18.

The problem with what you are saying is that somehow the words of Christ on the Cross are not true.

You are saying..."It is not finished." ... because there is something left to be done...

...Christ did not fulfill all of the promises to the descendants of Jacob...

...The gift of eternal life and the restoration to this world to something more like the Garden of Eden in the New Heavens and the New Earth are not enough.

...The promises to the descendants of Jacob are different than the promises to those in the New Blood Covenant...

...Their inheritance is different from our inheritance...

...We have been adopted into Abraham's family and are heirs to the promises in Galatians 3:29, but God has got to give Abraham's natural seed something different.

...We are not equal heirs with the natural descendants of Jacob. God has to give them eternal life and a piece of land in this fallen, sin-cursed world.

What did Christ say about the fulfillment of the Old Testament?



Mat 5:18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.


Luk 24:25 Then he said unto them, O fools, and slow of heart to believe all that the prophets have spoken:

Luk 24:26 Ought not Christ to have suffered these things, and to enter into his glory?

Luk 24:27 And beginning at Moses and all the prophets, he expounded unto them in all the scriptures the things concerning himself.


The New Blood Covenant of Jesus Christ, which was fulfilled at Calvary, completed every promise foretold in the Old Testament.

None of the natural descendants of Abraham, who wrote the New Testament, said anything about an unfulfilled land promise.
Not Matthew.
Not John.
Not Peter.
Not Paul.
Not James.

If these men who were filled with the Holy Ghost power did not say anything about an unfulfilled land promise, why in the world would you insist otherwise?

Anything less is to deny what is plainly taught by the words of the New Testament and especially the words of the Son of God on the Cross...


Joh 19:30 When Jesus therefore had received the vinegar, he said, It is finished: and he bowed his head, and gave up the ghost.



.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Hank77
Upvote 0

Luke17:37

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2016
1,668
550
United States
✟19,666.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
The problem with what you are saying is that somehow the words of Christ on the Cross are not true.

You are saying..."It is not finished." ... because there is something left to be done...

...Christ did not fulfill all of the promises to the descendants of Jacob...

...The gift of eternal life and the restoration to this world to something more like the Garden of Eden in the New Heavens and the New Earth are not enough.

...The promises to the descendants of Jacob are different than the promises to those in the New Blood Covenant...

...Their inheritance is different from our inheritance...

...We have been adopted into Abraham's family and are heirs to the promises in Galatians 3:29, but God has got to give Abraham's natural seed something different.

...We are not equal heirs with the natural descendants of Jacob. God has to give them eternal life and a piece of land in this fallen, sin-cursed world.

What did Christ say about the fulfillment of the Old Testament?



Mat 5:18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.


Luk 24:25 Then he said unto them, O fools, and slow of heart to believe all that the prophets have spoken:

Luk 24:26 Ought not Christ to have suffered these things, and to enter into his glory?

Luk 24:27 And beginning at Moses and all the prophets, he expounded unto them in all the scriptures the things concerning himself.


The New Blood Covenant of Jesus Christ, which was fulfilled at Calvary, completed every promise foretold in the Old Testament.

Anything less is to deny what is plainly taught by the words of the New Testament...

.

No, I'm not saying that Jesus was lying. Jesus fulfilled the covenant of salvation though the Seed of the Woman, Abraham, and David when He came the first time. When He comes again, He'll fulfill the covenant of the land - so the borders will be according to the promise (wadi of Egypt to Euphrates River). Then He Jesus will reign as King in Jerusalem over all the kingdoms of the earth. (This promise isn't fulfilled yet, either, and that's what the Jews primarily expected when He came, and why some were disappointed.) There's nothing wrong with full covenant land borders being unfulfilled at the moment; it doesn't diminish Jesus work on the cross in any way. And, according to Isaiah's prophesies, He will fulfill it when He comes again.

If you disagree, we disagree.

You can research it some more if you like. Ask someone at Jews for Jesus about it if you like. They'd be happy to talk with you.
 
Upvote 0

BABerean2

Newbie
Site Supporter
May 21, 2014
20,614
7,484
North Carolina
✟916,165.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
No, I'm not saying that Jesus was lying. Jesus fulfilled the covenant of salvation though the Seed of the Woman, Abraham, and David when He came the first time. When He comes again, He'll fulfill the covenant of the land - so the borders will be according to the promise (wadi of Egypt to Euphrates River). Then He Jesus will reign as King in Jerusalem over all the kingdoms of the earth. (This promise isn't fulfilled yet, either, and that's what the Jews primarily expected when He came, and why some were disappointed.) There's nothing wrong with full covenant land borders being unfulfilled at the moment; it doesn't diminish Jesus work on the cross in any way. And, according to Isaiah's prophesies, He will fulfill it when He comes again.

If you disagree, we disagree.

You can research it some more if you like. Ask someone at Jews for Jesus about it if you like. They'd be happy to talk with you.

You are looking for the kingdom of the Pharisees, in this world, where sin and death remain...


Joh 4:21 Jesus saith unto her, Woman, believe me, the hour cometh, when ye shall neither in this mountain, nor yet at Jerusalem, worship the Father.


2Pe 3:10 But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up.

2Pe 3:11 Seeing then that all these things shall be dissolved, what manner of persons ought ye to be in all holy conversation and godliness,

2Pe 3:12 Looking for and hasting unto the coming of the day of God, wherein the heavens being on fire shall be dissolved, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat?

2Pe 3:13 Nevertheless we, according to his promise, look for new heavens and a new earth, wherein dwelleth righteousness.



Heb 11:16 But now they desire a better country, that is, an heavenly: wherefore God is not ashamed to be called their God: for he hath prepared for them a city.



Isa 65:17 For, behold, I create new heavens and a new earth: and the former shall not be remembered, nor come into mind.


We will be worshipping in New Jerusalem...

.

 
  • Like
Reactions: Hank77
Upvote 0

Luke17:37

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2016
1,668
550
United States
✟19,666.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
You are looking for the kingdom of the Pharisees, in this world, where sin and death remain...


Joh 4:21 Jesus saith unto her, Woman, believe me, the hour cometh, when ye shall neither in this mountain, nor yet at Jerusalem, worship the Father.


2Pe 3:10 But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up.

2Pe 3:11 Seeing then that all these things shall be dissolved, what manner of persons ought ye to be in all holy conversation and godliness,

2Pe 3:12 Looking for and hasting unto the coming of the day of God, wherein the heavens being on fire shall be dissolved, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat?

2Pe 3:13 Nevertheless we, according to his promise, look for new heavens and a new earth, wherein dwelleth righteousness.



Heb 11:16 But now they desire a better country, that is, an heavenly: wherefore God is not ashamed to be called their God: for he hath prepared for them a city.



Isa 65:17 For, behold, I create new heavens and a new earth: and the former shall not be remembered, nor come into mind.


We will be worshipping in New Jerusalem...

.

So you don't believe in a literal kingdom where Jesus reigns on this earth, judges, provides peace, and in most aspects removes the curse (Genesis 3)?

Off the top of my head, these chapters address the millennial reign of Jesus as King over Israel and all the earth: Psalm 2, Isaiah 2, Isaiah 11, Isaiah 65, Zechariah 14, Revelation 20?

Jesus died literally and rose literally from the grave so that we could live both spiritually and literally. Do you not believe in our literal physical resurrection?

I believe He reigns as King spiritually, but that He will reign as King literally as well.
 
Upvote 0

BABerean2

Newbie
Site Supporter
May 21, 2014
20,614
7,484
North Carolina
✟916,165.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
So you don't believe in a literal kingdom where Jesus reigns on this earth, judges, provides peace, and in most aspects removes the curse (Genesis 3)?

Off the top of my head, these chapters address the millennial reign of Jesus as King over Israel and all the earth: Psalm 2, Isaiah 2, Isaiah 11, Isaiah 65, Zechariah 14, Revelation 20?

Jesus died literally and rose literally from the grave so that we could live both spiritually and literally. Do you not believe in our literal physical resurrection?

I believe He reigns as King spiritually, but that He will reign as King literally as well.

There are two resurrections in John chapter 5.

The "first resurrection" in John chapter 5 is where we are spiritually passed from death to life. John 5:24

The second resurrection in John chapter 5 is the simultaneous bodily resurrection and judgement of all the dead.
John 5:27-30.
Revelation 11:18

He will reign literally over us in our real resurrection bodies in the real New Heavens and the New Earth, where all of the curse is removed.
He defeated sin and death at the Cross.

Based on various passages it may be something similar to the Garden of Eden, with the curse removed, but goes beyond anything we can now understand.


The whole Bible is about Him. It is a Him book. He wrote every yot and every tittle. John 1:1

He reigns literally forever. Revelation 11:15
.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hank77
Upvote 0

Luke17:37

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2016
1,668
550
United States
✟19,666.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
There are two resurrections in John chapter 5.

The "first resurrection" in John chapter 5 is where we are spiritually passed from death to life. John 5:24

The second resurrection in John chapter 5 is the simultaneous bodily resurrection and judgement of all the dead.
John 5:27-30.
Revelation 11:18

He will reign literally over us in our real resurrection bodies in the real New Heavens and the New Earth, where all of the curse is removed.
He defeated sin and death at the Cross.

Based on various passages it may be something similar to the Garden of Eden, with the curse removed, but goes beyond anything we can now understand.


The whole Bible is about Him. It is a Him book. He wrote every yot and every tittle. John 1:1

He reigns literally forever. Revelation 11:15
.

So you don't believe believe Jesus will reign on this earth at all! I don't know if you realize this, but I doubt many share your views.

Revelation 20 clearly describes this 1,000 year reign (with Satan bound) and then after that the Gog/Magog rebellion after Satan is released. Only after that, the heavens and earth having passed away, souls are before God at the Great White Throne Judgment. And after THAT will be the new heavens and the new earth, with the new Jerusalem (Revelation 21).

Revelation 20:4
And I saw thrones, and they sat on them, and judgment was committed to them. Then I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded for their witness to Jesus and for the word of God, who had not worshiped the beast or his image, and had not received his mark on their foreheads or on their hands. And they lived and reigned with Christ for a thousand years. 5 But the rest of the dead did not live again until the thousand years were finished. This is the first resurrection. 6 Blessed and holy is he who has part in the first resurrection. Over such the second death has no power, but they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with Him a thousand years.

According to Revelation 20, the first (physical) resurrection (of the Church) happens before the thousand years, and the second resurrection happens after the thousand years.

Did you read Isaiah 2, 11, 65? If not, I have pasted a few passages here.

Isaiah 2:1-5
The word that Isaiah the son of Amoz saw concerning Judah and Jerusalem.
2 Now it shall come to pass in the latter days
That the mountain of the Lord’s house
Shall be established on the top of the mountains,
And shall be exalted above the hills;
And all nations shall flow to it.
3 Many people shall come and say,
“Come, and let us go up to the mountain of the Lord,
To the house of the God of Jacob;
He will teach us His ways,
And we shall walk in His paths.”
For out of Zion shall go forth the law,
And the word of the Lord from Jerusalem.
4 He shall judge between the nations,
And rebuke many people;
They shall beat their swords into plowshares,
And their spears into pruning hooks;
Nation shall not lift up sword against nation,
Neither shall they learn war anymore.

(There will be true world peace!)

Isaiah 11:6-9
6 “The wolf also shall dwell with the lamb,
The leopard shall lie down with the young goat,
The calf and the young lion and the fatling together;
And a little child shall lead them.
7 The cow and the bear shall graze;
Their young ones shall lie down together;
And the lion shall eat straw like the ox.
8 The nursing child shall play by the cobra’s hole,
And the weaned child shall put his hand in the viper’s den.
9 They shall not hurt nor destroy in all My holy mountain,
For the earth shall be full of the knowledge of the Lord
As the waters cover the sea.

(Animals will go back to their Eden diet and disposition.)

Isaiah 65:20-25
20 “No more shall an infant from there live but a few days,
Nor an old man who has not fulfilled his days;
For the child shall die one hundred years old,
But the sinner being one hundred years old shall be accursed.

21 They shall build houses and inhabit them;
They shall plant vineyards and eat their fruit.
22 They shall not build and another inhabit;
They shall not plant and another eat;
For as the days of a tree, so shall be the days of My people,
And My elect shall long enjoy the work of their hands.
23 They shall not labor in vain,
Nor bring forth children for trouble;

For they shall be the descendants of the blessed of the Lord,
And their offspring with them.
24 “It shall come to pass
That before they call, I will answer;
And while they are still speaking, I will hear.
25 The wolf and the lamb shall feed together,
The lion shall eat straw like the ox,
And dust shall be the serpent’s food.
They shall not hurt nor destroy in all My holy mountain,”
Says the Lord.

(The pain of childbirth will be removed, and lifespans will be increased as they were before the flood.)

Psalm 87:5-6
5 And of Zion it will be said,
This one and that one were born in her;
And the Most High Himself shall establish her.”
6 The Lord will record,
When He registers the peoples:
This one was born there.”
Selah

Now, by this point you might be wondering why I have highlighted all the babies in these passages.

Check this out:

Matthew 22:23-32
23 The same day the Sadducees, who say there is no resurrection, came to Him and asked Him, 24 saying: “Teacher, Moses said that if a man dies, having no children, his brother shall marry his wife and raise up offspring for his brother. 25 Now there were with us seven brothers. The first died after he had married, and having no offspring, left his wife to his brother. 26 Likewise the second also, and the third, even to the seventh. 27 Last of all the woman died also. 28 Therefore, in the resurrection, whose wife of the seven will she be? For they all had her.”
29 Jesus answered and said to them, “You are mistaken, not knowing the Scriptures nor the power of God. 30 For in the resurrection they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like angels of God in heaven. 31 But concerning the resurrection of the dead, have you not read what was spoken to you by God, saying, 32 ‘I am the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob’? God is not the God of the dead, but of the living.”

Since in the resurrection, there is no marriage, how then were these babies born? The babies can't be born in the New Jerusalem (heavenly)... they must be born in the millennial, earthly reign of Jesus. And the removal of the pain of childbirth--that must also be in the earthly reign of Jesus, since no children are born in the new heavens and the new earth.

Consider also what it says in Ezekiel 47:

47 Then he brought me back to the door of the temple; and there was water, flowing from under the threshold of the temple toward the east, for the front of the temple faced east; the water was flowing from under the right side of the temple, south of the altar. 2 He brought me out by way of the north gate, and led me around on the outside to the outer gateway that faces east; and there was water, running out on the right side.
3 And when the man went out to the east with the line in his hand, he measured one thousand cubits, and he brought me through the waters; the water came up to my ankles. 4 Again he measured one thousand and brought me through the waters; the water came up to my knees. Again he measured one thousand and brought me through; the water came up to my waist. 5 Again he measured one thousand, and it was a river that I could not cross; for the water was too deep, water in which one must swim, a river that could not be crossed. 6 He said to me, “Son of man, have you seen this?” Then he brought me and returned me to the bank of the river.
7 When I returned, there, along the bank of the river, were very many trees on one side and the other. 8 Then he said to me: “This water flows toward the eastern region, goes down into the valley, and enters the sea. When it reaches the sea, its waters are healed. 9 And it shall be that every living thing that moves, wherever the rivers go, will live. There will be a very great multitude of fish, because these waters go there; for they will be healed, and everything will live wherever the river goes. 10 It shall be that fishermen will stand by it from En Gedi to En Eglaim; they will be places for spreading their nets. Their fish will be of the same kinds as the fish of the Great Sea, exceedingly many. 11 But its swamps and marshes will not be healed; they will be given over to salt. 12 Along the bank of the river, on this side and that, will grow all kinds of trees used for food; their leaves will not wither, and their fruit will not fail. They will bear fruit every month, because their water flows from the sanctuary. Their fruit will be for food, and their leaves for medicine.”
13 Thus says the Lord God: “These are the borders by which you shall divide the land as an inheritance among the twelve tribes of Israel. Joseph shall have two portions. 14 You shall inherit it equally with one another; for I raised My hand in an oath to give it to your fathers, and this land shall fall to you as your inheritance.
15 “This shall be the border of the land on the north: from the Great Sea, by the road to Hethlon, as one goes to Zedad, 16 Hamath, Berothah, Sibraim (which is between the border of Damascus and the border of Hamath), to Hazar Hatticon (which is on the border of Hauran). 17 Thus the boundary shall be from the Sea to Hazar Enan, the border of Damascus; and as for the north, northward, it is the border of Hamath. This is the north side.
18 “On the east side you shall mark out the border from between Hauran and Damascus, and between Gilead and the land of Israel, along the Jordan, and along the eastern side of the sea. This is the east side.
19 “The south side, toward the South, shall be from Tamar to the waters of Meribah by Kadesh, along the brook to the Great Sea. This is the south side, toward the South.
20 “The west side shall be the Great Sea, from the southern boundary until one comes to a point opposite Hamath. This is the west side.
21 “Thus you shall divide this land among yourselves according to the tribes of Israel. 22 It shall be that you will divide it by lot as an inheritance for yourselves, and for the strangers who dwell among you and who bear children among you. They shall be to you as native-born among the children of Israel; they shall have an inheritance with you among the tribes of Israel. 23 And it shall be that in whatever tribe the stranger dwells, there you shall give him his inheritance,” says the Lord God.

Do you realize it's saying there will be a river flowing out of the temple foundation to the east, and into the Dead Sea, and it will no longer be dead, but be teeming with fish? Do you realize the Lord gives tribe allotments for His land?

You see, God speaks CLEARLY of His physical reign on this earth (before His reign in the new heavens and the new earth.) If you choose not to believe it, that's your choice, but you would have to spiritualize everything and take out the references to the babies.

I came across this commentary on 2 Timothy 2:18 and I thought I'd share it with you. It is different than what you are saying but there's some good points.

The New American Commentary: 1, 2 Timothy, Titus, Lea, Thomas D., Griffin, Hayne P., Jr., on 2 Timothy 2:17-18:

[2 Timothy 2:17-18
17 And their message will spread like cancer. Hymenaeus and Philetus are of this sort, 18 who have strayed concerning the truth, saying that the resurrection is already past; and they overthrow the faith of some.]

2:18 Paul asserted that these two ringleaders had “wandered away from the truth.” The term “wander away” suggests that they had missed the mark. Paul had also used the term in 1 Tim 1:6; 6:21.
Paul identified the nature of the heresy. The two heretics had asserted that the general resurrection had “already taken place.” Greeks often showed a contempt for the concept of physical resurrection. Because they viewed the body as evil, they eschewed the concept of a future bodily resurrection. For such people a spiritualized or sacramental view of resurrection was more congenial. Paul had taught the concept of spiritual resurrection (see Eph 2:6; Rom 6:3–4), but he had also asserted the reality of a future resurrection (1 Cor 15; Phil 3:21). The Ephesian teaching concerning the resurrection may have denied a future bodily resurrection. It probably asserted that the resurrection had already occurred in the spiritual renewal of the believer by regeneration.
For Paul the result of such heresy was to “destroy the faith of some.” In asserting that the resurrection had already occurred, the false teachers could deny both the past resurrection of Christ and the future resurrection of believers. They could depreciate the body and promote asceticism. Both emphases can lead to moral indifference. D. Guthrie says, “Christianity without a resurrection ceases to be a living faith.” For Paul the resurrection hope was foundational in Christianity. In 1 Cor 15 Paul had shown that a denial of the possibility of resurrection jettisoned the gospel (15:3–11), brought the credibility of the apostles into question (15:14–15), and robbed believers of an incentive for sacrifice and service (15:29–34). Paul did not specify in this passage all the negative results he expected from an affirmation that the resurrection had already occurred, but he clearly viewed it as an unacceptable perversion and as a threat to all spiritual progress.

I am not going to go back and forth with you any longer on this subject.

God bless.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

BABerean2

Newbie
Site Supporter
May 21, 2014
20,614
7,484
North Carolina
✟916,165.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I am not going to go back and forth with you any longer on this subject.

I am well aware of the premillennial interpretation taken by many today.
The problem is that it stands in direct conflict with the words of Jesus and many other New Testament writers.

I do not care what others believe. All I care about is what the text says.
Is someone else says something that conflicts with what is written in God's Word, then they have an incorrect interpretation.

Jesus said in John Chapter 5 that all the dead will be judged at the same time.



Joh 5:27 And hath given him authority to execute judgment also, because he is the Son of man.

Joh 5:28 Marvel not at this: for the hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice,

Joh 5:29 And shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation.

Joh 5:30 I can of mine own self do nothing: as I hear, I judge: and my judgment is just; because I seek not mine own will, but the will of the Father which hath sent me.

Timothy says both those alive and dead will be judged at the Second Coming.

2Ti 4:1 I charge thee therefore before God, and the Lord Jesus Christ, who shall judge the quick and the dead at his appearing and his kingdom;

Jesus says the nations will be judged at His Second Coming.

Mat 25:31 When the Son of man shall come in his glory, and all the holy angels with him, then shall he sit upon the throne of his glory:

Mat 25:32 And before him shall be gathered all nations: and he shall separate them one from another, as a shepherd divideth his sheep from the goats:

Mat 25:33 And he shall set the sheep on his right hand, but the goats on the left.



Rev 11:15 And the seventh angel sounded; and there were great voices in heaven, saying, The kingdoms of this world are become the kingdoms of our Lord, and of his Christ; and he shall reign for ever and ever.

The dead are judged at the time of the 7th trumpet, as seen below.


Rev 11:18 And the nations were angry, and thy wrath is come, and the time of the dead, that they should be judged, and that thou shouldest give reward unto thy servants the prophets, and to the saints, and them that fear thy name, small and great; and shouldest destroy them which destroy the earth.

Therefore, the Premillenial interpretation cannot be correct, no matter how many people believe it to be the correct interpretation.

The problem for many is the "first resurrection" found in John chapter 5.


John 5:24 Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life.

When you accepted Christ, you were resurrected from death to life, just as those found at the beginning of Revelation chapter 20.

The Apostle John recorded both passages...
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Douggg

anytime rapture, non-dispensationalist, futurist
May 28, 2009
29,927
3,557
Non-dispensationalist
✟411,188.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
For the umpteenth time, I am asking you to show me an example, from a link, that uses independent clauses as a list after a colon because I don't think that is what they meant by a list after a colon.
We have to look at what the colon does in the Daniel 9:26 verse... because while I can find samples of sentences (as a list) following a colon, in my brief search, so far, I have not found a precise exact example that would equate to Daniel 9:26 because it is not a everyday type sentence structure, mainly.

Go back to Genesis and start scanning down through the text, chapter to chapter, from the beginning. You will notice that the majority of the verses begin with an "And". What is being presented is a series of items - as time moves forward in the text. That's what the And's are signifying.

I went over to the MessiahTruth.com (countermissionary) Judaism site and asked Uri Yosef in the Hebrew language forum if the and's are in the Hebrew text in Genesis, as well. His response was...."Yes, the Hebrew texts also has those "And's", but in a particular form, and they convey the notion of continuity of the events in the account of Creation. In the Hebrew language the conjunctive "and" is actually a prefix that is attached to the word it modifies."

In Daniel 9:26, the and's in front of the independent clauses, following the colon, constitute as series of events that follow the messiah being cutoff, as time moves forward unto the completion of the 70 weeks. The and's in verse 26 are for the 70 weeks as it's time moves forward, not the messiah, because even the lead-in independent clause (containing the messiah) begins with an And. Just like how Genesis is written.

26 And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

miamited

Ted
Site Supporter
Oct 4, 2010
13,243
6,313
Seneca SC
✟705,807.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Hi precepts,

So, I'm going to have to assume that it is your position that Nehemiah was not being honest in his assessment of Jerusalem.

Nehemiah spoke to king Artaxerxes:
“May the king live forever! Why should my face not look sad when the city where my ancestors are buried lies in ruins, and its gates have been destroyed by fire?” The king said to me, “What is it you want?” Then I prayed to the God of heaven, and I answered the king, “If it pleases the king and if your servant has found favor in his sight, let him send me to the city in Judah where my ancestors are buried so that I can rebuild it.”

Nehemiah declared during the reign of Artaxerxes that the city lay in ruins and the gates were destroyed by fire. But that can't be according to your 'facts'. Cyrus had already rebuilt the city by then, right? Nehemiah was not telling the truth. Do you suppose he just wanted more vacation time?

I don't doubt that Cyrus may well have had a hand in beginning the rebuilding process, but apparently by the time of Artaxerxes it wasn't finished. Cyrus may well have been the one to release the Jews to return to their homeland, but according to Nehemiah in the time of Artaxerxes the city still lay in ruins. There were Jews living in the area already. Nehemiah speaks to them about the destroyed city and encourages them to start the rebuilding effort. Is all of this not true according to the word of God?

So, yes, Cyrus may have begun some rebuilding effort and certainly released the Jews to return to their homeland, but the city still lay in ruins and the gates destroyed in Artaxerxes day.

Now, as to the prophecy. It doesn't say, 'when the city begins to be rebuilt'; it doesn't say, 'when the people return from their captivity'. It says, 'when the decree to restore and rebuild Jerusalem goes forth...'. So let's stick with looking for what the prophecy says we are to be looking for. Artaxerxes issued a decree at the behest of Nehemiah to go and rebuild the city and its gates and gave Nehemiah letters that he could give to the neighboring kings ordering them to help out in the rebuilding effort.

I don't doubt God's word and I believe Isaiah's claim that God said that Cyrus, king of Persia, would rebuild His city, but that's not what the prophecy tells us to look for. The prophecy is based strictly and solely on a decree that was to be issued. That decree was issued in 444 B.C. and from there, if we count off the 69 sevens, we come to exactly when the Annointed one was with us and that is what the prophecy is foretelling. So, any date that you begin to count off the 69 sevens that does not end at the time of our Lord's visitation just has to be wrong concerning this prophecy. It just has to be because the prophecy clearly states that after the 69 sevens the Annointed one would be here and be cut off.

“Know and understand this: From the time the word goes out to restore and rebuild Jerusalem until the Anointed One, the ruler, comes, there will be seven ‘sevens,’ and sixty-two ‘sevens.’

Gabriel even tells Daniel very carefully to 'know and understand this...

God bless you.
In Christ, Ted
 
  • Like
Reactions: Luke17:37
Upvote 0

Goodbook

Reading the Bible
Jan 22, 2011
22,090
5,107
New Zealand
Visit site
✟93,895.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
It seems some people are confused about the resurrections.

There are two, resurrection of the wicked and of the righteous. The wicked to eternal punishment and the righteous to eternal life.
Revelation also talks about the second death.

Also some people think Jesus comes and goes all the time, but as far as I know, he's bringing the new heaven and earth with Him and we are going to live with Him forever.
Jerusalem is the centre of it, but not sure about this whole nation of Israel peace treaty thing.

the Israelites were nearly wiped out with the holocaust and they were scattered abroad.
When Jesus was speaking with the disciples he was talking of what would happen in their lifetimes and to watch for the abomination of desolation that would be set up in the temple before it was completely destroyed. He didn't say oh but that won't happen till 2000 years later. He warned them to flee to the hills and hoped it wouldn't happen on a holy day or sabbath.

I think some people want to believe otherwise because they have a political agenda.
What Jesus told the disciples has spiritual application for us gentiles. But it doesn't mean that, it didn't happen to the israelites.

Remember that the vision John had was on the Lords day and that it was all happening soon,(for him) well in God's dimension saints are in heaven now for eternity but we can't see it in our earth time. Nobody can enter heaven without Jesus, lets make that clear..we not going to be half in heaven and half on earth our bodies are going to be resurrected and made new and there's going to be no more sorrow or crying.

Also, the case for a millenium is because revelation tells us that 1000 years separates the resurrections of the righteous and the wicked to be destroyed. the righteous will be at the bema seat and the wicked at the great white throne.

I am not sure why people want to conflate the two but its certain that Jesus comes for the righteous first before dealing with the wicked.
 
Upvote 0

Luke17:37

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2016
1,668
550
United States
✟19,666.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
It seems some people are confused about the resurrections.

There are two, resurrection of the wicked and of the righteous. The wicked to eternal punishment and the righteous to eternal life.
Revelation also talks about the second death.

Also some people think Jesus comes and goes all the time, but as far as I know, he's bringing the new heaven and earth with Him and we are going to live with Him forever.
Jerusalem is the centre of it, but not sure about this whole nation of Israel peace treaty thing.

the Israelites were nearly wiped out with the holocaust and they were scattered abroad.
When Jesus was speaking with the disciples he was talking of what would happen in their lifetimes and to watch for the abomination of desolation that would be set up in the temple before it was completely destroyed. He didn't say oh but that won't happen till 2000 years later. He warned them to flee to the hills and hoped it wouldn't happen on a holy day or sabbath.

I think some people want to believe otherwise because they have a political agenda.
What Jesus told the disciples has spiritual application for us gentiles. But it doesn't mean that, it didn't happen to the israelites.

Remember that the vision John had was on the Lords day and that it was all happening soon,(for him) well in God's dimension saints are in heaven now for eternity but we can't see it in our earth time. Nobody can enter heaven without Jesus, lets make that clear..we not going to be half in heaven and half on earth our bodies are going to be resurrected and made new and there's going to be no more sorrow or crying.

Also, the case for a millenium is because revelation tells us that 1000 years separates the resurrections of the righteous and the wicked to be destroyed. the righteous will be at the bema seat and the wicked at the great white throne.

I am not sure why people want to conflate the two but its certain that Jesus comes for the righteous first before dealing with the wicked.

This is just one interpretation.

I believe there will be an abomination that causes desolation (of some sort) in the future just as there was in the past. I believe there will be tribulation in the future, just as the early church faced tribulation (only worse).

I don't think the judgment of the wicked Jesus is talking about in Matthew 13 is the White Throne Judgment. I think it's the slaughtering of the armies that come against Jerusalem, etc (physical death to His enemies). See Zechariah 14:12, Revelation 19:21.

I believe Jesus comes once, at the end of the 7th trumpet and bowl. He kills his enemies (see above), then gathers the righteous. This is consistent with Matthew 13, the parable of the wheat and tares, which calls for taking out the wicked before gathering the righteous. I believe He brings the dead in Christ and raises them, while changing those alive, and they stay on the earth with Jesus.

I believe Jesus will reign as King then over all the earth (His government set up in Jerusalem) for 1,000 years with Satan bound, taking away almost all of the curse (Isaiah 2, 11, 65, Ezekiel 47, etc.). After the thousand years, Satan will be released and will succeed in deceiving a large army who will approach Jerusalem while the people are living in the peace Jesus gave them. After they are consumed by fire, heaven and earth will flee away. The second resurrection (of the wicked and Christians who died in the 1,000 year reign) will then take place, and the White Throne Judgment. The wicked will be thrown into the Lake of Fire to be tortured forever and those in Christ will dwell with God in the New Heavens and the New Earth (with the New Jerusalem).
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

BABerean2

Newbie
Site Supporter
May 21, 2014
20,614
7,484
North Carolina
✟916,165.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I believe Jesus comes once, at the end of the 7th trumpet and bowl. He kills his enemies (see above), then gathers the righteous. This is consistent with Matthew 13, the parable of the wheat and tares, which calls for taking out the wicked before gathering the righteous. I believe He brings the dead in Christ and raises them, while changing those alive, and they stay on the earth with Jesus.

You are correct and you also just eliminated the premillennial position.

Forget everything you have ever heard from the mouth of a man, watched in a movie, or read in a book and read the Word of God.

Take it at face value, without trying to make it fit something else.



Rev 11:15 And the seventh angel sounded; and there were great voices in heaven, saying, The kingdoms of this world are become the kingdoms of our Lord, and of his Christ; and he shall reign for ever and ever.
(The kingdoms of this world become the kingdoms of God and Christ "forever" at the 7th trumpet. How long is forever? It is a lot longer than 1,000 years.)



Rev 11:18 And the nations were angry, and thy wrath is come, and the time of the dead, that they should be judged, and that thou shouldest give reward unto thy servants the prophets, and to the saints, and them that fear thy name, small and great; and shouldest destroy them which destroy the earth.

(God's wrath and the time of the judgment of the dead happens right after the 7th trumpet.)

2Ti 4:1
I charge thee therefore before God, and the Lord Jesus Christ, who shall judge the quick and the dead at his appearing and his kingdom;
(Christ judges both those alive and dead at His appearing.)


Joh 5:27 And hath given him authority to execute judgment also, because he is the Son of man.

Joh 5:28 Marvel not at this: for the hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice,

Joh 5:29 And shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation.

Joh 5:30 I can of mine own self do nothing: as I hear, I judge: and my judgment is just; because I seek not mine own will, but the will of the Father which hath sent me.
(Here we have the bodily resurrection of all the dead, both good and evil, bracketed above and below by Christ's judgment.)

Why can't we just take God's Word at face value, instead of trying to make it fit what we have been taught by a manmade doctrine?
.






 
Upvote 0