Free will is greatly misunderstood. It is not what we will do that is being played out before us, but what we did do. History is God's [His] story. He is timeless, so the times of the world are storytime telling the story and our part in it. It is finished.
And our part in it? So we are being judged for what we choose to do. So why is doing bad things even an option for us?
You misunderstand. It is not about indoctrination, but about the example that we can witness in a child's behavior, that we should learn from if we are to know the will of God for His children. It is an example of a good father wanting good children, and just what that looks like. It is a guide, by example.
It's telling us that unless we are taught to believe as children we will never get into Heaven. Sounds like indoctrination to me.
Remember, this is not a story of what people want, but what people did, and who is and who is not going beyond the worldly experience to something better. It is insight.
It is still very poorly defined.
This is just more of what is outlined in 1 Corinthians 6:9...more of what people "did" in the story that is "Finished," more of what is not acceptable if you want your part in the story to have a [full] and happy ending. This is the story of you making your choice, of life or death.
This does not explain why God supports the idea of thoughtcrimes. Besides, if it is God's plan that you get a full and happy ending, then it's going to happen, even if you drink and have envious thoughts.
Again, you misunderstand. This is the [finished] story of those who presumed to be smarter than Him who is writing the story, whose story this is...as if Donald Duck could re-write his own story and be his own Walt Disney, and just how utterly foolish that is.
It sure doesn't sound like that to me. To continue your analogy, it sounds to me like Donald is trying to learn more about the world Walt created for him.
Again, this is not a story that we are writing for ourselves. This is the story of us choosing to be a part of the real world (the kingdom of God), or simply die at the end of our storybook tale. Just like what I am telling you now, you can choose to believe it or not, but there are life and death consequences.
The fact you say there are life and death consequences does not mean that there actually ARE.
This confirms everything I have told you about this being a "finished" story ("since before the foundation of the world.").
No, it's about how these guys were saying they got into God's "rest" (I assume they mean Heaven) even though one day when he was ticked off, God said that some people won't get in.
It is not that God has left them out, but I left them out...simply to make the point, and to give you the truth of our story.
God didn't leave them out? Please tell me which part of the Bible says not to rape? Which part of the Bible says, "thou shalt not beat thy wife"?
And in what way does leaving those passages (if they exist) in take away from the story you are trying to tell?
All of what I have told you can be applied to the same principle of this being God's story first, and that our part in it is limited to His terms, and the consequence of thinking we can re-write it to suit our ungodly character. It is finished.
John 19:30
All of what you have told me sounds like stretching the interpretation of certain Bible passages in order to fit your ideas. It's something I have seen Christians do many times. Even my husband used to do it to me, but I questioned him and forced him to actually examine those beliefs he held instead of just being told what the passages meant by his church. Now he disagrees with them on some fairly big things.