no "weak spots" in the BBT or the ToE ?
this is a joke right ?
I believe he was referring to his statement: "At this point there are no known major issues with either theory" Do you know of any major issues?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
no "weak spots" in the BBT or the ToE ?
this is a joke right ?
Yes I can, through logic and reason which are superior to the scientific method, which is founded upon them, which is a superior science, and more necessary than empirical evidence.
We only have the scientific method because it is logical. If it was not proven by logic then we could not use it. You cannot use science to prove science is true. The demonstrations of science being true are proven true because they are logical and reasonable. Logic and reason have no beginning and no end, they are eternal and uncreated metaphysical things that exist of necessity and that without them nothing makes sense. They are needed in every single thing we do. Like the basic laws of non-contradiction. Without them everything would be utter nonsense and confusion. And these laws of logic and reason do not originate from anywhere than an eternal uncreated intelligent mind because they could not have come from the untintelligent inanimate big bang which is less than them. They are greater than such and therefore did not come from such. Logic and reason have always existed. Science also did. But science is knowledge and I'm not talking about the scientific method today. I'm talking about science/knowledge period. But all knowledge must be logical to be true. Was there ever a time when the universe was illogical? Beings might sometimes use faulty reasoning. But universe always works in a logically coherent way. It is not something that was invented and developed.
Yes I can, through logic and reason which are superior to the scientific method, which is founded upon them, which is a superior science, and more necessary than empirical evidence.
Granite evolves?
Bottom line is he is saying here is one small thing that is not fully explained, throw out existing theory and replace it with something that explains this one thing even though it flies in the face of 100 times as much other evidence.
Nice rant. Seems like you've been hanging around with the pre-suppositional apologetics crowd.
Logic and reason are abstract concepts. Ones we use to describe the universe. Without thinking minds to discern them, would they still exist?
Regrading the bolded bit, you might want to look into quantum mechanics and pure mathematics. Both of these fields contain paradoxes that are both true AND illogical. So knowledge does not need to be logical to be true.
One more thing before I go. The reason I would have to write a paper is because I would have to give logical evidence why I accept the Christian God and the Christian Scriptures as true. It is mainly because of my acceptance of that religion as the most logical to me why I do not believe in the possibility of living in a matrix. This would be pretty tedious I think. But I am absolutely positive there is a Creator Mind who is a Person/Personality (God) and who is all benevolent as well as all knowing, present, and powerful. And if for some reason it was proven to me that the Christian God and its Scriptures are false, then I would think it might be possible that we could be living in a matrix. MAYBE.