Present the evidence. Then I am sure someone will counter with their evidence.![]()
That's how you think evidence works?
You sure you should be posting in this forum?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Present the evidence. Then I am sure someone will counter with their evidence.![]()
The point is the amount is irrelevant to what I was arguing. Someone said there is no verifiable credible evidence for Christianity. That is simply false.
Bible is a part of Christianity. Thus anything in the Bible can be used as evidence.
Some parts of the bible can be deemed credible with a high degree of certainty. Other parts are deemed credible with lower degrees of certainty.
Much of the bible though, can not be deemed with credible or reliable by historians who do that for a living. I have studied the NT extensively by reading the works of various NT scholars and historians. They can all pretty much agree on the following in regards to the gospels specifically:
-Jesus was baptized
-Jesus had followers
-Jesus was likely a real person
-Jesus was crucified
Beyond that, the opinions are all over the place and when the historical method is applied as it was intended to be applied, not much else has much credibility, in regards to being reliable history.
Bible is a part of Christianity. Thus anything in the Bible can be used as evidence. You already mentioned some parts of the Bible are verifiable or deemed credible.
That makes my point entirely. Now what credible evidence can you provide for the Buggy Monster?
According to your logic, anything in a Spiderman comic can be used to prove that Spiderman is real. Well, New York city is discussed in Spiderman comics. Is that evidence that Spiderman is real?
I would challenge that bhsmte. It seems that recently Jesus' existence has come into serious academic question. Richard Carrier and others can provide very good arguments that Jesus did not actually exist.
That's how you think evidence works?
You sure you should be posting in this forum?
Please tell me that on further reflection you realize how this is completely faulty logic...
Spiderman comic was and is made as a fiction book no? Try again
I have probably read, the works of a dozen highly credentialed NT scholars and historians. In fact it was this exercise and what I learned, that caused me to conclude, that I could no longer reconcile the Christian theology with reality.
With that said, the vast majority of these folks, give a high degree of credibility to Jesus likely being a real person. Granted, there is much bias in NT scholarship and historical work, because the majority of these folks are Christians themselves.
I am fully aware of Carrier's arguments and will admit, they can be quite compelling and I would imagine, they will likely gain steam, because Carrier applies the historical method as it was intended to be applied, with rigor.
As I stand right now, I would lean towards Jesus likely being a real person, but I could be swayed as more critical examination takes place.
I have probably read, the works of a dozen highly credentialed NT scholars and historians. In fact it was this exercise and what I learned, that caused me to conclude, that I could no longer reconcile the Christian theology with reality.
With that said, the vast majority of these folks, give a high degree of credibility to Jesus likely being a real person. Granted, there is much bias in NT scholarship and historical work, because the majority of these folks are Christians themselves.
I am fully aware of Carrier's arguments and will admit, they can be quite compelling and I would imagine, they will likely gain steam, because Carrier applies the historical method as it was intended to be applied, with rigor.
As I stand right now, I would lean towards Jesus likely being a real person, but I could be swayed as more critical examination takes place.
Spiderman comic was and is made as a fiction book no? Try again
You're completely missing the point...
Whether or not there was a historical Jesus (and yes, Carrier's book is pretty good), the more defensible position without getting mired down in arguable details is that there's no good evidence that a historical Jesus was a god.
LOL, fine. Legends of Greek Gods revolve around real places, Mount Olympus for one. So is that evidence that the Greek Gods exist, and they are more probable?
Until you demonstrate the mathematical probability that your God exists, or demonstrate mathematically that your God is more probable than another God, you can't say it is "more probable". I've explained this numerous times, and I'm still waiting for the mathematical equations.
Sounds like someone is suggesting false faith and for one that believes in God would understand that God knows the difference between fake and real. This, to me suggests that the person really doesn't think God it all that intelligent, because he can be dupped by anyone who claims to love him, so he can slide by Christ and enter into the kingdom of God, without really doing anything.
Was Legend of Greek Gods written as a factual account of people, events, and places? Or was it a fictional book that happened to include some real places?
I already demonstrated how the Christian God is more probable than the Buggy Man.