Our track records speak very differently. You have consistantly denied science and always you have been unable to provide any rational grounds for that denial.
When planets or galaxies have a different rotation than the uniform event of the big bang and subsequent imaginary smash ups predict..they do what any cult does. They invent exotic scenarios to excuse the exceptions. Total dreams.
My goodness, you do seem to be getting carried away.
You see light here on earth. You put light through a prism here on earth. You therefore only get what can be gotten here. Since you do not know how far away or big the other points of light you cite are you cannot attach much meaning to the stars having some of the same elements etc! The space station has some of the same elements as earth...so? That doesn't mean both are planets.
And you don't seem, to understand that what we see elsewhere in the universe is absolutely the same as what we see here.
You cannot plead that not seeing things at all helps you!
Then why do you make that same claim?
Like creation. The door swings both ways.
So which one has the evidence from reality?
No, stop the insane denial.
It's not denial. It is fact. You have never been able to provide any positive support for your claims.
I get truth by hearing God's word. Science gets squat.
Funny how people of every religion say the same thing.
OK, easy to do. Show the math in your own words, or a short concise quote.
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/...lted-impact-double-blows-moons-space-science/
This guy ran computer simulations to see what could have happened. While I don't have the details of the program he used, I'm certain he does. Please feel free to contact him and request the details for yourself. If you do, I certainly hope you'll make your communications public so we can all see what he says.
Here's his contact details.
http://www.iau.org/administration/membership/individual/11712/
(Now, I'm half suspecting that you are going to find some way to get out of actually putting your money where your mouth is, as we say here in Australia. Perhaps you will claim that because I can't explain it myself that it doesn't count, even though that isn't enough to make it useless.)
[/quote]That all depends on what the 'thing' is.
That all you got??[/QUOTE]
So you're answer is to claim that you get to arbitrarily choose whether it counts or not, based on whether you want it to?
That all YOU got? Because it sure ain't much.