- May 22, 2015
- 5,895
- 569
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
It's wrong because I just proved that providing an explanation doesn't mean the explanations are true.
Then, on top of that, you have paradoxes...which aren't necessarily true or false.
So truth exists independently of your "something".
Indeed, truth exists independently of any human mind. Which should prove that no human mind can be truth itself, which shows that whatever the truth is must be accepted as true(believed by the human mind), then and only then can truth be known by the human mind.
Upvote
0