- Jun 26, 2015
- 26,470
- 15,558
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
Then we all need to just Stop It!!! It's hateful and unproductive.It doesn't have to be, but it is.
Upvote
0
Then we all need to just Stop It!!! It's hateful and unproductive.It doesn't have to be, but it is.
Other employees had also complained about her sitting around and reading her books when she should have been helping them with other duties. So it appears there was more than one issue and more than one complaint.Ah, I was unaware of the co-worker complaint. I just read a snippet (bad on me, I know) quickly this morning.
Still, it is an entirely different situation than the Kim Davis thing.
Although I am curious as to how one member of the team of attendants not serving alcohol would place any significant burden on the other attendants. Why not assign her one of the many non-alcohol-related duties performed by flight attendants?
and some Christians can disobey the word of god'Some laws are meant to be broken'
and some Christians can disobey the word of god
Romans 13:1
Let everyone be subject to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established. The authorities that exist have been established by God.
lol and the word of god saysYeah, that verse in no way means what you think it means, and for those 'some' Christians as well. In fact, that's likely just a recent invention of interpretation from pacifists and liberals, just like the trivializing of whatever is stated of homosexuality in the Bible.
Acts 5:29
Then Peter and the other apostles answered and said, We ought to obey God rather than men.
lol and the word of god says
Romans 13:1
Let everyone be subject to the governing authorities!
Acts 5
27 The apostles were brought in and made to appear before the Sanhedrin to be questioned by the high priest. 28 “We gave you strict orders not to teach in this name,” he said. “Yet you have filled Jerusalem with your teaching and are determined to make us guilty of this man’s blood.”
They could have obeyed the Sanhedrin and in doing so would not be disobeying the word of god.
And you think you have the correct interpretation?I'm sure an atheist would love nothing more than that interpretation.
And you think you have the correct interpretation?
The early Christians weren't martyred because they were following Rome. These interpretations are just flat out stupid.
People just make things up to justify enabling sin.
I'm sure an atheist would love nothing more than that interpretation. We can just get out of your way and make the world yours
You need to get your facts straight, the apostles were not martyring themselves against Rome, they were rebelling against god and the authority of SanhedrinThe early Christians weren't martyred because they were following Rome. These interpretations are just flat out stupid.
People just make things up to justify enabling sin.
I'm sure an atheist would love nothing more than that interpretation. We can just get out of your way and make the world yours
The entire rest of Christianity would include those true Christians that don't believe that your interpretation is correct.Me and the entire rest of Christianity now and all through history, yes.
The early Christians were martyred for their faith in Jesus Christ
The entire rest of Christianity would include those true Christians that don't believe that your interpretation is correct.
It appears to be, it was Kim Davis who was acting like a dictator, ignoring the law and making her own law.
Looks like Mike Huckabee could learn a thing or two about poor campaign tactics from Donald Trump. Much like the Republican frontrunner, the Huckster has found himself in hot water for the unauthorized use of an artist’s song at a public event. While Neil Young simply flipped Trump the metaphorical bird and REM handed him a cease and desist, ’80s rockers Survivor are considering taking it a step further by threatening a lawsuit over the use of their classic “Eye of the Tiger”.
“NO! We did not grant Kim Davis any rights to use ‘My Tune -The Eye Of The Tiger’,” [sic] Survivor guitarist Frank Sullivan wrote on the band’s Facebook page. “I would not grant her the rights to use Charmin! C’mom Mike, you are not The Donald but you can do better than that.” He ended the post with a hint at the eventual legal actions: “See Ya really SoooooooonnnnnnN!!!!!!”
As mentioned earlier in this thread, two of the band members of Survivor had some words for Mike Huckabee for using their song, 'Eye of the Tiger' without their permission at a public event. Well, now it looks like Survivor is threatening both Mike Huckabee and Kim Davis with a lawsuit over the unauthorized use of their song.
Survivor threatens Mike Huckabee and Kim Davis with lawsuit over use of “Eye of the Tiger”
Excerpted from the article...
And then there is this quote from one of the band members...
Well, yes, families are the basis of society, if you want to call that a "special little club". The more totalitarian the government, the more pressure is exerted to destroy families, because they hold a barrier to the complete subjugation, obedience, and dependence on the state. History makes this clear. It's a bit more than just something personal between 2 parties.
The only explanation I can see for these sorts of claims are that the people making them must struggle with their sexuality, and that the socially unacceptable nature of homosexuality was previously all that held this in check. Now that some of the prejudice against homosexuals has been removed, they're finding the struggle harder, which to them, feels like society telling them to "be gay".I've always thought that this is a real fear among the most anti-homosexual crowd. Especially considering the examples of closeted who have been caught/called out in public.
It's simple. The clerk fit's the roll of 1st world Christian martyr, thereby giving credence to the "Christians are being persecuted" narrative.I still don't get all the support for the clerk. Those devout Christians that are so enamored by her and her stance confuse me. Who defines right and wrong? Who defines sin? Who defines marriage? Is it man or is it God? Does a government's opinion/stance/rules/laws have the ability to actually redefine that which God instituted?