My Graduate Challenge

[Loudmouth]

Well, then we disagree; I consider them to be the same.

I am sure it isn't the first time, or the last time.

 

[AV1611VET]

Irrelevant, can you tell me what direction Abraham looks on a penny without looking at one?

Up?

 

[AV1611VET]

"God Save The Queen"?

Not exactly.

You got one word right.

 

[HitchSlap]

Not exactly.

You got one word right.

Save?

 

[TLK Valentine]

Not exactly.

You got one word right.

One more than you did -- or have you not looked under Washington's chin lately?

 

[pgp_protector]

One more than you did -- or have you not looked under Washington's chin lately?

I even posted a picture.

 

[Justatruthseeker]

The definition I have always used for faith is a belief held in the absence of evidence. I define delusion as a belief that is held in contradiction to 200 years of solid scientific evidence.

Agreed, so why do evolutionists believe despite 200 years of solid scientific evidence that contradicts them?

 

[Loudmouth]

Agreed, so why do evolutionists believe despite 200 years of solid scientific evidence that contradicts them?

How does the distribution of orthologous ERV's contradict evolution? How does the existence of transitional hominid fossils contradict evolution?

 

[bhsmte]

Agreed, so why do evolutionists believe despite 200 years of solid scientific evidence that contradicts them?

No links or youtube videos? I was looking forward to some pixie dust.

 

[Justatruthseeker]

Sorry, the major extinctions that have occurred in our past never killed off all life. Genesis is at best merely a book of morality stories. Even the people that understand it the best say that Genesis is not meant to be taken literally.

No, one or two survived like the coelacanth - which DNA showed how incorrect evolutionists were. You know, real evidence that got it thrown off the transitory list. Some reptiles and fish survived. But are not similar to the new ones. But yes, I know, you just can't find all the millions of transnationals.

The problem is your lineage is falling apart as science advances.

http://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/oct/17/skull-homo-erectus-human-evolution

https://sapientiaexanimo.wordpress....icists-disprove-out-of-africa-claim/#more-133

REF:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21896735

http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?paperID=19566#.VW9dAEYjYig

 

[Justatruthseeker]

triplicate

 

[Justatruthseeker]

duplicate

 

[Justatruthseeker]

woah, clicked once and 3 posts

 

[Loudmouth]

No, one or two survived like the coelacanth - which DNA showed how incorrect evolutionists were.

How did it do that?

You know, real evidence that got it thrown off the transitory list.

What "transitory list"? Why can't extant species be transitional? You do realize that "transitional" and "ancestor" are two different things, don't you?

Some reptiles and fish survived. But are not similar to the new ones. But yes, I know, you just can't find all the millions of transnationals.

Just like we can't find Jimmy Hoffa's grave. Doesn't mean that Jimmy Hoffa never existed.

All the while, you ignore the transitionals we have found.

The problem is your lineage is falling apart as science advances.

http://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/oct/17/skull-homo-erectus-human-evolution

https://sapientiaexanimo.wordpress....icists-disprove-out-of-africa-claim/#more-133

REF:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21896735

http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?paperID=19566#.VW9dAEYjYig

Any chance of discussion the actual science?

 

[Loudmouth]

I am still waiting for the explanation of why these transitional fossils contradict evolution.

How does finding fossil species with a mixture of human and ape features contradict evolution?

 

[Justatruthseeker]

How does the distribution of orthologous ERV's contradict evolution? How does the existence of transitional hominid fossils contradict evolution?

No links or youtube videos? I was looking forward to some pixie dust.

ERV's are foreign viruses, they bring foreign DNA to the host which the host uses for proteins.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10607609

You mean those incorrect classifications or DNA tests that show your theory wrong? See post above.

 

[bhsmte]

ERV's are foreign viruses, they bring foreign DNA to the host which the host uses for proteins.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10607609

You mean those incorrect classifications or DNA tests that show your theory wrong? See post above.

I have never seen anyone on these boards be refuted as much and still come back for more.

 

[Loudmouth]

ERV's are foreign viruses, they bring foreign DNA to the host which the host uses for proteins.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10607609

What are orthologous ERV's? Can you describe them?

Can you also show how the species distribution of orthologous ERV's contradicts evolution?

You mean those incorrect classifications or DNA tests that show your theory wrong? See post above.

Show us the science.

 

[RickG]

Any chance of discussion the actual science?

Don't hold your breath.

 

[Justatruthseeker]

I am still waiting for the explanation of why these transitional fossils contradict evolution.

How does finding fossil species with a mixture of human and ape features contradict evolution?

That you rely of wrong information and mis-classifications is your problem in understanding, not mine.

http://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/oct/17/skull-homo-erectus-human-evolution

"Over decades excavating sites in Africa, researchers have named half a dozen different species of early human ancestor, but most, if not all, are now on shaky ground...."

"...Some palaeontologists see minor differences in fossils and give them labels, and that has resulted in the family tree accumulating a lot of branches,..."

And with DNA evidence, you got no ground to stand on at all.

http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?paperID=19566#.VW9lAUYjYih