• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Seal Clubbing

jacknife

Theophobic troll
Oct 22, 2014
2,046
849
✟186,524.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Green
Is there anything immoral about killing an animal in order to experience a certain taste?
Just to experience a taste would fall into luxurey the environment must be considered when choosing which animals to eat.
 
Upvote 0

nebulaJP

Well-Known Member
Jul 15, 2011
688
51
✟23,663.00
Faith
Taoist
Marital Status
Single
There is nothing immoral about killing animals out of necessity, such as for food or warmth. But for looks? Please. You don't have to have a degree in ethics to know this is wrong.

Just to clarify, what I was getting at with the ‘taste’ question is, most of the killing that goes on in slaughterhouses has little to do with necessity and a lot do do with satisfying the taste buds of humans.

For example, when you buy bacon, are you buying it because you feel it is necessary for your survival or because you enjoy eating bacon?

It’s probably necessary for optimal human health to eat small amounts of animal products 2 or 3 times per month and I would not argue with that. But it is definitely not necessary to eat animal products with every meal or to have “hot dog eating contests” etc. So I’m saying all of this “extra” animal killing is immoral, for the same reason seal slaughter is. The immorality arises from the attitude that human pleasure alone is worth the suffering and death of animals.
 
Upvote 0

Desk trauma

[redacted]
Site Supporter
Dec 1, 2011
22,615
18,570
✟1,473,024.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
For example, when you buy bacon, are you buying it because you feel it is necessary for your survival or because you enjoy eating bacon?

If people were to break their food shopping down to subsistence level meat would be the least of the changes.
 
Upvote 0

OldWiseGuy

Wake me when it's soup.
Site Supporter
Feb 4, 2006
46,773
10,977
Wisconsin
Visit site
✟1,005,242.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others

Attachments

  • Harp seal -1.jpg
    Harp seal -1.jpg
    190.1 KB · Views: 69
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Hank

has the Right to be wrong
May 28, 2002
1,026
51
Toronto
✟24,426.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Politics
CA-Conservatives
Is seal clubbing moral? Why or why not? For me, the only logical answer is that it is completely evil to murder animals for luxury items.
I say it moral. One blow usually does the trick. Fur is much warmer than this plastic fake stuff and it last longer also. It's actually more cost effective to get one fur for a decade or two than a new crap coat every year.

Evil? I like being warm in winter. :)
 
Upvote 0

KitKatMatt

stupid bleeding heart feminist liberal
May 2, 2013
5,818
1,602
✟37,020.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
There's nothing wrong with harvesting animals for luxury reasons.

As long as they're not a protected species, out of season, or being abused/tortured instead of being killed quickly and humanely, then there shouldn't be any issue.

We need to respect and treat humanely the animals we use and harvest.

I think we could do with using animals as a resource a lot less than we do now, but that's just my own opinion. I don't think there's anything wrong with using them, even if it's for "luxury" items.
 
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,127
33,263
✟584,002.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Seal clubbing is just as moral as lobster fishing except for two things: baby seals look cuter and so we think of them as though they were human babies. We don't care about lobsters. Second, clubbing anything seems barbaric, but if it's quick and effective, it's certainly no less humane than boiling the creature alive!
 
Upvote 0

nebulaJP

Well-Known Member
Jul 15, 2011
688
51
✟23,663.00
Faith
Taoist
Marital Status
Single
I say it moral. One blow usually does the trick. Fur is much warmer than this plastic fake stuff and it last longer also. It's actually more cost effective to get one fur for a decade or two than a new crap coat every year.

Evil? I like being warm in winter. :)

So it’s moral to kill if it is useful and cost-effective for the killer?
 
Upvote 0

nebulaJP

Well-Known Member
Jul 15, 2011
688
51
✟23,663.00
Faith
Taoist
Marital Status
Single
There's nothing wrong with harvesting animals for luxury reasons.

As long as they're not a protected species, out of season, or being abused/tortured instead of being killed quickly and humanely, then there shouldn't be any issue.

We need to respect and treat humanely the animals we use and harvest.

I think we could do with using animals as a resource a lot less than we do now, but that's just my own opinion. I don't think there's anything wrong with using them, even if it's for "luxury" items.

What is the difference between “harvesting” and “the strong victimizing the weak”?
 
Upvote 0