My Suspended Entropy Challenge

[Belk]

Can your Cuckoo Clocks cure this?

Luke 9:42 And as he was yet a coming, the devil threw him down, and tare him. And Jesus rebuked the unclean spirit, and healed the child, and delivered him again to his father.

Is this the fruit you wish to be presenting?

 

[TLK Valentine]

So all you have are insults? You are finished dealing with reality?

When did he start?

 

[HitchSlap]

Can your Cuckoo Clocks cure this?

Luke 9:42 And as he was yet a coming, the devil threw him down, and tare him. And Jesus rebuked the unclean spirit, and healed the child, and delivered him again to his father.

I'd buy tickets.

 

[DogmaHunter]

Explain this phenomenon ...

Deuteronomy 29:5 And I have led you forty years in the wilderness: your clothes are not waxen old upon you, and thy shoe is not waxen old upon thy foot.

... in such a way as to pass peer review and get acclaim in physics for showing how the second law of thermodynamics was suspended back then.

Easy: it's a myth

 

[mzungu]

Explain this phenomenon ...

Deuteronomy 29:5 And I have led you forty years in the wilderness: your clothes are not waxen old upon you, and thy shoe is not waxen old upon thy foot.

... in such a way as to pass peer review and get acclaim in physics for showing how the second law of thermodynamics was suspended back then.

It is just a bronze age myth. A story told by people who believed the world was flat and in geocentricism! Not to mention talking snakes etc.

 

[AV1611VET]

Easy: it's a myth

Let's try this again, with emphasis:

Explain this phenomenon ...

Deuteronomy 29:5 And I have led you forty years in the wilderness: your clothes are not waxen old upon you, and thy shoe is not waxen old upon thy foot.

... in such a way as to pass peer review and get acclaim in physics for showing how the second law of thermodynamics was suspended back then.

 

[AV1611VET]

It is just a bronze age myth. A story told by people who believed the world was flat and in geocentricism! Not to mention talking snakes etc.

That's nice.

Care to answer my challenge as I wrote it?

 

[mzungu]

That's nice.

Care to answer my challenge as I wrote it?

You obviously have misunderstood the meaning of peer review. A non scientific myth simply cannot be used to refute a fundamental scientific fact. You really have no idea how science works AV.

 

[AV1611VET]

You obviously have misunderstood the meaning of peer review.

Whatever peer review is -- apply it.

A non scientific myth simply cannot be used to refute a fundamental scientific fact.

How about submitting Deuteronomy 29:5 as an historical fact?

You really have no idea how science works AV.

And you don't know how my challenges work, do you?

Can you explain Deuteronomy 29:5 in such a way as to pass peer review and get your name in lights?

If not, why are you even posting in this thread, except to ridicule it?

 

[mzungu]

Whatever peer review is -- apply it.

How about submitting Deuteronomy 29:5 as an historical fact?

And you don't know how my challenges work, do you?

Can you explain Deuteronomy 29:5 in such a way as to pass peer review and get your name in lights?

If not, why are you even posting in this thread, except to ridicule it?

I do not need to explain a myth. A myth is a myth and no matter how you try to dress it, there is no way a myth can be used to refute any law of thermodynamics. You have committed the cardinal sin of assuming a myth is fact!
Your challenge holds no water and certainly no scientific merit whatsoever.

 

[AV1611VET]

I do not need to explain a myth.

Then if you don't mind me asking: what is your motivation for even posting in this thread?

Just to tell me Deuteronomy 29:5 is a myth?

Mind if I take that as harrassment?

I mean -- are you really that bored?

 

[DogmaHunter]

Let's try this again, with emphasis:

in such a way as to pass peer review and get acclaim in physics for showing how the second law of thermodynamics was suspended back then

Dude....

Before one can do such a thing, one would have to establish the facts. You didn't establish any facts. You copied some lines from a book. Everything about it suggests it's a myth. There are no facts to explain.

No facts to explain = no explanation to publish.
No explanation to publish = nothing to review.

Before one can explain how the 2nd law was suspendend, one must first show that it was actually suspended. You didn't do that.

We can't meet your challenge, because you don't actually have a challenge.

 

[DogmaHunter]

Then if you don't mind me asking: what is your motivation for even posting in this thread?

Exposing your intellectual dishonesty and fallacious reasoning.

 

[AV1611VET]

Before one can do such a thing, one would have to establish the facts.

Get to it then.

Use that 20/10 science to establish the facts.

You didn't establish any facts.

That's right.

I didn't.

I didn't make this thread for me.

This challenge is for you to explain it.

You copied some lines from a book.

I quoted a Bible verse.

God bless America, eh?

Everything about it suggests it's a myth.

Here we go again.

There are no facts to explain.

Thanks for your ... um ... input then.

No facts to explain = no explanation to publish.
No explanation to publish = nothing to review.

Nothing to review = nothing to post.

Before one can explain how the 2nd law was suspendend, one must first show that it was actually suspended.

Get to it.

Let's see that fabulous 20/10 science in action.

You didn't do that.

That's right.

I didn't do that.

I didn't make this thread for me.

This challenge is for you to explain it.

We can't meet your challenge, because you don't actually have a challenge.

Bye-bye then.

 

[AV1611VET]

Exposing your intellectual dishonesty and fallacious reasoning.

That's nice.

You can't answer my challenge, and it's my fault ... right?

 

[mzungu]

Then if you don't mind me asking: what is your motivation for even posting in this thread?

Just to tell me Deuteronomy 29:5 is a myth?

Mind if I take that as harrassment?

I mean -- are you really that bored?

On the contrary my good man; all I have done is point out to you that your challenge is flawed.

1: Bible quotes are religious quotes and have no scientific bearing. The Bible deals only with the spiritual world.

2: The laws of thermodynamics are scientific laws and have no religious bearing. Science deals only with the physical world.

To quote an old adage: "You cannot compare apples to oranges". Apples and oranges - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[DogmaHunter]

Get to it then.

It's not my job to substantiate your claims dude.

 

[DogmaHunter]

That's nice.

You can't answer my challenge, and it's my fault ... right?

Yes. Because your challenge is invalid.

You present unsubstantiate religious beliefs and pretend that they are facts. Your "challenge" is for us to explain those "facts".

But what you present as "facts" aren't actually "facts".

It's like asking someone to dissect a chicken and find the kidneys. Only instead of giving them an actual chicken to dissect, you're giving them a plastic apple.

One can't rise to the challenge of pulling the kidneys out of a chicken when instead of a chicken, you're giving them plastic fruit.

Get your act together first and ask a real question.

 

[Kylie]

Av, forgotten my last post?

 

[AV1611VET]

Av, forgotten my last post?

What? this one: 55?

Thanks for bringing it up.

Now I have to forget it all over again!