Why Evolution is True (2)

[bhsmte]

You may consider your research to be extensive but it is really *very* limited in scope in that you only seem to be looking at research that agrees with you.

Good research (at least involving science) looks for things that can invalidate one's viewpoint. The idea is to try to show yourself wrong and when your idea holds up to many attempts to falsify it, then you may be onto something solid.

This is part of the fun of studying science, being shown wrong.

Dizredux

Grady will ignore 100 expert opinions that disagree with him, until he finds the one outlier that agrees with him and then he will cling to it for dear life.

Lastly, he won't read the research that he claims backs him half the time and it doesn't even say what he claims it does.

And, round and round we go.

 

[createdtoworship]

Grady will ignore 100 expert opinions that disagree with him, until he finds the one outlier that agrees with him and then he will cling to it for dear life.

Lastly, he won't read the research that he claims backs him half the time and it doesn't even say what he claims it does.

And, round and round we go.

if it were truly as you say, instead of going round and round, you would simply call me out on it. As I do repeatedly when you guys dodge scientists that are IDers' just because they are non evolution and not on the basis of their arguments.

 

[ChrisBot]

This thread was split automatically after 1000 replies and this thread has been automatically closed.
The new thread automatically created is here: "Why Evolution is True (3)"