A question for JWs about the use of "Jehovah" in Colossians

ChetSinger

Well-Known Member
Apr 18, 2006
3,518
650
✟124,958.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Lord is a title not God's name, so every thing is confusing if we do not put God's name in its rightful place.

The scripture should read

(Genesis 7:15, 16) 15 They kept going to Noah inside the ark, two by two, of every sort of flesh that has the breath of life. 16 So they went in, male and female of every sort of flesh, just as God had commanded him. After that Jehovah shut the door behind him.

In Psalms it give you a fine example how by using titles can be confusing to the reader.

Psalm 110:1 King James Version (KJV)

110 The Lord said unto my Lord, Sit thou at my right hand, until I make thine enemies thy footstool.

It should read:-

(Psalm 110:1) 110 Jehovah declared to my Lord: “Sit at my right hand Until I place your enemies as a stool for your feet.”

No longer confusing is it?

Two separate people God & his son Jesus Christ.

God cannot sit at his own right hand.
That' fine, but I wasn't asking for WTS theology, which I'm already familiar with. What I'm asking is, do you accept that the divinity of the Word of the Lord was a Jewish, pre-Christian concept?
 
Upvote 0
Oct 4, 2013
430
9
✟15,609.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
That' fine, but I wasn't asking for WTS theology, which I'm already familiar with. What I'm asking is, do you accept that the divinity of the Word of the Lord was a Jewish, pre-Christian concept?

Yes the Jewish system was a tutor to Christ

What happened to the complete Jewish system in 70 C.E. which showed they were no-longer God's representatives, would you agree.
 
Upvote 0

ChetSinger

Well-Known Member
Apr 18, 2006
3,518
650
✟124,958.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Yes the Jewish system was a tutor to Christ

What happened to the complete Jewish system in 70 C.E. which showed they were no-longer God's representatives, would you agree.
I'm not exactly sure what you're saying, because while you answer 'yes' then the rest of your answer confused me. So for clarity's sake, you accept that the divinity of the Word of the Lord was a Jewish idea that predated Christianity?
 
Upvote 0
Oct 4, 2013
430
9
✟15,609.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I'm not exactly sure what you're saying, because while you answer 'yes' then the rest of your answer confused me. So for clarity's sake, you accept that the divinity of the Word of the Lord was a Jewish idea that predated Christianity?

This scripture will enlighten you

(Galatians 3:26-29) 26 YOU are all, in fact, sons of God through YOUR faith in Christ Jesus. 27 For all of YOU who were baptized into Christ have put on Christ. 28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor freeman, there is neither male nor female; for YOU are all one [person] in union with Christ Jesus. 29 Moreover, if YOU belong to Christ, YOU are really Abraham’s seed, heirs with reference to a promise.

So the Jewish system that was set up was to fufill a promise that all nations of the earth would be blessed through Jesus Christ out Lord and King.

(Genesis 22:15-18) 15 And Jehovah’s angel called to Abraham a second time from the heavens, 16 saying: “‘By myself I swear,’ declares Jehovah, ‘that because you have done this and you have not withheld your son, your only one, 17 I will surely bless you and I will surely multiply your offspring like the stars of the heavens and like the grains of sand on the seashore, and your offspring will take possession of the gate of his enemies. 18 And by means of your offspring all nations of the earth will obtain a blessing for themselves because you have listened to my voice.’”

(Revelation 7:9, 10) 9 After this I saw, and look! a great crowd, which no man was able to number, out of all nations and tribes and peoples and tongues, standing before the throne and before the Lamb, dressed in white robes; and there were palm branches in their hands. 10 And they keep shouting with a loud voice, saying: “Salvation we owe to our God, who is seated on the throne, and to the Lamb.”

The Lamb being Jesus Christ of course.
 
Upvote 0

ChetSinger

Well-Known Member
Apr 18, 2006
3,518
650
✟124,958.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
This scripture will enlighten you...
I'm not sure there's much to be gained by continuing this conversation, because when I ask a question I get a long response that doesn't answer the question.

I'll try once more: do you accept that the divinity of the Word of the Lord was a Jewish idea that predated Christianity?
 
Upvote 0

Bongoon

Member
Jul 11, 2014
74
1
✟15,199.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
That' fine, but I wasn't asking for WTS theology, which I'm already familiar with. What I'm asking is, do you accept that the divinity of the Word of the Lord was a Jewish, pre-Christian concept?

Where does it say this? The name of the Lord is to be feared. And The Lord is his name. Although not his full name. This is written in "THE NAMES" or S'moth in the T'nakh. Do not speak of John's heresy to me again.
 
Upvote 0
Oct 4, 2013
430
9
✟15,609.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I'm not sure there's much to be gained by continuing this conversation, because when I ask a question I get a long response that doesn't answer the question.

I'll try once more: do you accept that the divinity of the Word of the Lord was a Jewish idea that predated Christianity?

No it was God's Idea not a Jewish Idea, how have you arrived at that conclusion.
 
Upvote 0

Bongoon

Member
Jul 11, 2014
74
1
✟15,199.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
No it was God's Idea not a Jewish Idea, how have you arrived at that conclusion.

You are dodging the issue. Do you hold to the truth that the word of the Lord is divine, and is always right? That the word of Adonai Elohim carries with it the power to divide Truth from falsehood, and the sheep from the goats.
 
Upvote 0
Oct 4, 2013
430
9
✟15,609.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
You are dodging the issue. Do you hold to the truth that the word of the Lord is divine, and is always right? That the word of Adonai Elohim carries with it the power to divide Truth from falsehood, and the sheep from the goats.

The New Catholic Encyclopedia explains what took place some time after the Jews returned from their Babylonian exile in the sixth century B.C.E.

It says: “The name Yahweh [the Tetragrammaton with vowels added] began to be considered with special reverence, and the practice arose of substituting for it the word ADONAI [Lord] or ELOHIM [God]. .

The practice led in time to forgetfulness of the proper pronunciation of the name Yahweh.” Thus, people stopped using God’s name. Eventually, the exact ancient pronunciation was lost and the divine name became ineffable to them.

Although we cannot be certain exactly how God’s name was pronounced, the important thing is that using his name draws us closer to him.

Would you like your friends to call you “mister” or “miss,” or would you rather that they call you by your personal name?

Even if they speak another language and do not pronounce your name exactly right, you would still prefer to have them call you by your name, would you not?

The same is true of God. He wants us to use his personal name, Jehovah.

In English, the pronunciation “Jehovah” is commonly known.

Would it not be appropriate for all who love God to address him by that personal name and thus draw close to him? “Draw close to God, and he will draw close to you,” says the Bible.—James 4:8.

Lord & God are titles the name of God is important, that is what is to be sanctified, made Holy
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

ChetSinger

Well-Known Member
Apr 18, 2006
3,518
650
✟124,958.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
No it was God's Idea not a Jewish Idea, how have you arrived at that conclusion.
That's even better! Other WTS members have insisted that it was a false idea cooked up by church fathers, even as late as Constantine's generation.

Yes, the divinity of the Word of the Lord is why it's legal for us to worship Jesus: he is the Word of the Lord made flesh; he is divine. :)
 
Upvote 0

Bongoon

Member
Jul 11, 2014
74
1
✟15,199.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
The New Catholic Encyclopedia explains what took place some time after the Jews returned from their Babylonian exile in the sixth century B.C.E.

It says: “The name Yahweh [the Tetragrammaton with vowels added] began to be considered with special reverence, and the practice arose of substituting for it the word ADONAI [Lord] or ELOHIM [God]. .

The practice led in time to forgetfulness of the proper pronunciation of the name Yahweh.” Thus, people stopped using God’s name. Eventually, the exact ancient pronunciation was lost and the divine name became ineffable to them.

Although we cannot be certain exactly how God’s name was pronounced, the important thing is that using his name draws us closer to him.

Would you like your friends to call you “mister” or “miss,” or would you rather that they call you by your personal name?

Even if they speak another language and do not pronounce your name exactly right, you would still prefer to have them call you by your name, would you not?

The same is true of God. He wants us to use his personal name, Jehovah.

In English, the pronunciation “Jehovah” is commonly known.

Would it not be appropriate for all who love God to address him by that personal name and thus draw close to him? “Draw close to God, and he will draw close to you,” says the Bible.—James 4:8.

Lord & God are titles the name of God is important, that is what is to be sanctified, made Holy

No neither would a lowly manager like being called boss, by his employees. But you are still calling The Lord, by his title. Of course you could argue that there is only one true God, but you didn't. Besides, i'm really starting to warm to Chapter 5 of James.
 
Upvote 0
Oct 4, 2013
430
9
✟15,609.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
That's even better! Other WTS members have insisted that it was a false idea cooked up by church fathers, even as late as Constantine's generation.

Yes, the divinity of the Word of the Lord is why it's legal for us to worship Jesus: he is the Word of the Lord made flesh; he is divine. :)

THROUGHOUT the centuries, many in Christendom have worshiped Jesus Christ as if he were Almighty God.

Jesus himself, however, directed attention and worship only to Jehovah God.

For example, when prodded to do an act of worship to the Devil, Jesus said: “It is Jehovah your God you must worship, and it is to him alone you must render sacred service.” (Matthew 4:10)

Later Jesus instructed his disciples: “Do not call anyone your father on earth, for one is your Father, the heavenly One.”—Matthew 23:9.


To a Samaritan woman, Jesus described the type of worship that individuals must give to God.

Their worship must be based on spirit and truth.

Indeed, “the Father is looking for suchlike ones to worship him.” (John 4:23, 24)

Yes, reverent adoration should be expressed only to God.

To render worship to anyone or anything else would be a form of idolatry, which is condemned in both the Hebrew and the Greek Scriptures.—Exodus 20:4, 5; Galatians 5:19, 20.

(Philippians 2:10, 11) 10 so that in the name of Jesus every knee should bend—of those in heaven and those on earth and those under the ground— 11 and every tongue should openly acknowledge that Jesus Christ is Lord to the glory of God the Father.

Who Glory and worship is Jesus directing us to?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old.
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
28,580
6,065
EST
✟994,124.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
The New Catholic Encyclopedia explains what took place some time after the Jews returned from their Babylonian exile in the sixth century B.C.E.

It says: “The name Yahweh [the Tetragrammaton with vowels added] began to be considered with special reverence, and the practice arose of substituting for it the word ADONAI [Lord] or ELOHIM [God]. .

The practice led in time to forgetfulness of the proper pronunciation of the name Yahweh.” Thus, people stopped using God’s name. Eventually, the exact ancient pronunciation was lost and the divine name became ineffable to them.

Although we cannot be certain exactly how God’s name was pronounced, the important thing is that using his name draws us closer to him.

Would you like your friends to call you “mister” or “miss,” or would you rather that they call you by your personal name?

Even if they speak another language and do not pronounce your name exactly right, you would still prefer to have them call you by your name, would you not?

The same is true of God. He wants us to use his personal name, Jehovah.

In English, the pronunciation “Jehovah” is commonly known.

Would it not be appropriate for all who love God to address him by that personal name and thus draw close to him? “Draw close to God, and he will draw close to you,” says the Bible.—James 4:8.

Would it not be more appropriate to seek information about the name of God from a Jewish source rather than the Catholic Encyclopedia? While "Jehovah" might be well known it cannot possibly be how YHWH was pronounced. The pronunciation of YHWH must somehow be related to God's proclamation "I am that I am," Ex 3:14. Jehovah has no meaning in Hebrew but Yahweh is the third person singular imperfect "kal" of the verb (הוה/hawah ("to be"), meaning, therefore, "He is," or "He will be,"

Jewish Encyclopedia - YHWH.

Of the names of God in the Old Testament, that which occurs most frequently (6,823 times) is the so-called Tetragrammaton, Yhwh (יהוה), the distinctive personal name of the God of Israel. This name is commonly represented in modern translations by the form "Jehovah," which, however, is a philological impossibility (see Jehovah). This form has arisen through attempting to pronounce the consonants of the name with the vowels of Adonai (אדני = "Lord"), which the Masorites have inserted in the text, indicating thereby that Adonai was to be read (as a "keri perpetuum") instead of Yhwh. When the name Adonai itself precedes, to avoid repetition of this name, Yhwh is written by the Masorites with the vowels of Elohim, in which case Elohim is read instead of Yhwh. In consequence of this Masoretic reading the authorized and revised English versions (though not the American edition of the revised version) render Yhwh by the word "Lord" in the great majority of cases.

This name, according to the narrative in Ex. iii. (E), was made known to Moses in a vision at Horeb. In another, parallel narrative (Ex. vi. 2, 3, P) it is stated that the name was not known to the Patriarchs. It is used by one of the documentary sources of Genesis (J), but scarcely if at all by the others. Its use is avoided by some later writers also. It does not occur in Ecclesiastes, and in Daniel is found only in ch. ix. The writer of Chronicles shows a preference for the form Elohim, and in Ps. xlii.-lxxxiii. Elohim occurs much more frequently than Yhwh, probably having been substituted in some places for the latter name, as in Ps. liii. (comp. Ps. xiv.).

In appearance, Yhwh (יהוה) is the third person singular imperfect "kal" of the verb ( הוה ("to be"), meaning, therefore, "He is," or "He will be," or, perhaps, "He lives," the root idea of the word being,probably, "to blow," "to breathe," and hence, "to live." With this explanation agrees the meaning of the name given in Ex. iii. 14, where God is represented as speaking, and hence as using the first person—"I am" (אהיה, from ( היה, the later equivalent of the archaic stem ( הוה). The meaning would, therefore, be "He who is self-existing, self-sufficient," or, more concretely, "He who lives," the abstract conception of pure existence being foreign to Hebrew thought. There is no doubt that the idea of life was intimately connected with the name Yhwh from early times. He is the living God, as contrasted with the lifeless gods of the heathen, and He is the source and author of life (comp. I Kings xviii.; Isa. xli. 26-29, xliv. 6-20; Jer. x. 10, 14; Gen. ii. 7; etc.). So familiar is this conception of God to the Hebrew mind that it appears in the common formula of an oath, "hai Yhwh" (= "as Yhwh lives"; Ruth iii. 13; I Sam. xiv. 45; etc.).

If the explanation of the form above given be the true one, the original pronunciation must have been Yahweh ((יהוה) or Yahaweh (יהוה). From this the contracted form Jah or Yah (יה ) is most readily explained, and also the forms Jeho or Yeho (יהו ), and Jo or Yo (יו contracted from יהו , which the word assumes in combination in the first part of compound proper names, and Yahu or Yah (יהו ) in the second part of such names. The fact may also be mentioned that in Samaritan poetry יהוה rimes with words similar in ending to Yahweh, and Theodoret ("Quæst. 15 in Exodum") states that the Samaritans pronounced the name Iαβέ[Eahbay]. Epiphanius ascribes the same pronunciation to an early Christian sect. Clement of Alexandria, still more exactly, pronounces 'Iαουέ [Eahway] or 'Iαουαί, [Eahwai] and Origen, 'Iα. [Eah] Aquila wrote the name in archaic Hebrew letters. In the Jewish-Egyptian magic-papyri it appears as Ιαωουηε[Eahouay]. At least as early as the third century B.C. the name seems to have been regarded by the Jews as a "nomen ineffabile," on the basis of a somewhat extreme interpretation of Ex. xx. 7 and Lev. xxiv. 11 (see Philo, "De Vita Mosis," iii. 519, 529). Written only in consonants, the true pronunciation was forgotten by them. The Septuagint, and after it the New Testament, invariably render κύριος ("the Lord").

Jewish Encyclopedia online
 
Upvote 0

ChetSinger

Well-Known Member
Apr 18, 2006
3,518
650
✟124,958.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
THROUGHOUT the centuries, many in Christendom have worshiped Jesus Christas if he were Almighty God.

Jesus himself, however, directed attention and worship only to Jehovah God.

For example, when prodded to do an act of worship to the Devil, Jesus said: “It is Jehovah your God you must worship, and it is to him alone you must render sacred service.” (Matthew 4:10)

Later Jesus instructed his disciples: “Do not call anyone your father on earth, for one is your Father, the heavenly One.”—Matthew 23:9.


To a Samaritan woman, Jesus described the type of worship that individuals must give to God.

Their worship must be based on spirit and truth.

Indeed, “the Father is looking for suchlike ones to worship him.” (John 4:23, 24)

Yes, reverent adoration should be expressed only to God.

To render worship to anyone or anything else would be a form of idolatry, which is condemned in both the Hebrew and the Greek Scriptures.—Exodus 20:4, 5; Galatians 5:19, 20.
Since Jesus is the Word of the Lord made flesh, and the Word of the Lord is divine, then Jesus is divine, and can be worshiped. As Christians have been doing for 2,000 years.

Here's another appearance of the Word of the Lord in Jewish thought; they prayed to him:

but the Word of the Lord sitteth upon His throne high and lifted up, and heareth our prayer what time we pray before Him and make our petitions. Deuteronomy, Targum Pseudo-Jonathan

The next time you see Christians praying to Jesus, the Word of God made flesh, remember that Jews were already praying to him before he took on flesh and was born to Mary. :)
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

ChetSinger

Well-Known Member
Apr 18, 2006
3,518
650
✟124,958.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Look Chet i see what you are saying. It seems the translation says that the Lord spoke and the Ark was sealed from all calamity for the duration of the flood. Baruch Adonai. (The Lord be blessed)
By the way I got you a little mixed up with old S+T, on my last post

Thanks for clearing that up. I was scratching my head. :)
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old.
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
28,580
6,065
EST
✟994,124.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Since Jesus is the Word of the Lord made flesh, and the Word of the Lord is divine, then Jesus is divine, and can be worshiped. As Christians have been doing for 2,000 years.

Here's another appearance of the Word of the Lord in Jewish thought; they prayed to him:

but the Word of the Lord sitteth upon His throne high and lifted up, and heareth our prayer what time we pray before Him and make our petitions. Deuteronomy, Targum Pseudo-Jonathan

The next time you see Christians praying to Jesus, the Word of God made flesh, remember that Jews were already praying to him before he took on flesh and was born to Mary. :)

To add to what you said. John was a simple Jewish fisherman, not a Greek philosopher, therefore his understanding of God and the Word, would be Jewish, not Greek.

Here from the Jewish Encyclopedia, part of the article on “Memraמאמר/memra which in Aramaic means “word.” The Targums were Aramaic translations of the O.T., began during the Babylonian captivity about 700 BC.

In the below, which is only representative not comprehensive, there are at least eighty examples where the name יהוה/YHWH was replaced, in the Targums, with” מאמר/memra.” When John, the Jew, said to his Jewish audience, “In the beginning was the Word and the Word was God.,” he was not saying anything strange or new.

Remember this is not a Trinitarian source, it is the Jewish Encyclopedia prepared by Jewish scholars documenting the historical faith, beliefs, and practices of the ancient Jews. Some interesting quotes from the below article, all from the Targums, before the Christian era, note the parallels with the N.T..

[1] “Deut 4:7 The Word brings Israel nigh unto God and [The Word] sits on [God’s] throne receiving the prayers of Israel.” cf. Re 3:21 Re 22:3, N.T. ca. 70 AD.

[2] “Isa 48:13 His Word has laid the foundation of the earth.” cf. John 1:3, N.T. ca. 70 AD.

[3] “Isa 64;13 So, in the future, shall The Word be the comforter.” cf. John 14:26, N.T. ca. 70 AD.

[4] “Zech 12:5 In The Word redemption will be found.” cf. Luke 21:28, N.T. ca. 70 AD.

[5] “Lev 22:12 My Word shall be unto you for a redeeming deity.” cf. Col 1:14, Heb 9:12, Heb 9:15, N.T. ca. 70 AD.​

More complete citations.

Jewish Encyclopedia Memra-In the Targum:

In the Targum the Memra figures constantly as the manifestation of the divine power, or as God's messenger in place of God Himself, wherever the predicate is not in conformity with the dignity or the spirituality of the Deity.

Instead of the Scriptural "You have not believed in the Lord," Targ. Deut. i. 32 has "You have not believed in the word of the Lord"; instead of "I shall require it [vengeance] from him," Targ. Deut. xviii. 19 has "My word shall require it." "The Memra," [The Word] instead of "the Lord," is "the consuming fire" (Targ. Deut. ix. 3; comp. Targ. Isa. xxx. 27). The Memra "plagued the people" (Targ. Yer. to Ex. xxxii. 35). "The Memra smote him" (II Sam. vi. 7; comp. Targ. I Kings xviii. 24; Hos. xiii. 14; et al.). Not "God," but "the Memra [The Word]," is met with in Targ. Ex. xix. 17 (Targ. Yer. "the Shekinah"; comp. Targ. Ex. xxv. 22: "I will order My Memra to be there"). " I will cover thee with My Memra, [My Word] " instead of "My hand " (Targ. Ex. xxxiii. 22). Instead of "My soul," "My Memra [My Word] shall reject you" (Targ. Lev. xxvi. 30; comp. Isa. i. 14, xlii. 1; Jer. vi. 8; Ezek. xxiii. 18). "The voice of the Memra, [The Word] " instead of "God," is heard (Gen. iii. 8; Deut. iv. 33, 36; v. 21; Isa. vi. 8; et al.). Where Moses says, "I stood between the Lord and you" (Deut. v. 5), the Targum has, "between the Memra of the Lord and you"; and the "sign between Me and you" becomes "a sign between My Memra [My Word] and you" (Ex. xxxi. 13, 17; comp. Lev. xxvi. 46; Gen. ix. 12; xvii. 2, 7, 10; Ezek. xx. 12). Instead of God, the Memra comes to Abimelek (Gen. xx. 3), and to Balaam (Num. xxiii. 4). His Memra aids and accompanies Israel, performing wonders for them (Targ. Num. xxiii. 21; Deut. i. 30, xxxiii. 3; Targ. Isa. lxiii. 14; Jer. xxxi. 1; Hos. ix. 10 [comp. xi. 3, "the messenger-angel"]). The Memra goes before Cyrus (Isa. xlv. 12). The Lord swears by His Memra (Gen. xxi. 23, xxii. 16, xxiv. 3; Ex. xxxii. 13; Num. xiv. 30; Isa. xlv. 23; Ezek. xx. 5; et al.). It is His Memra that repents (Targ. Gen. vi. 6, viii. 21; I Sam. xv. 11, 35). Not His "hand," but His "Memra [His Word] has laid the foundation of the earth" (Targ. Isa. xlviii. 13); for His Memra's or Name's sake does He act (l.c. xlviii. 11; II Kings xix. 34). Through the Memra God turns to His people (Targ. Lev. xxvi. 90; II Kings xiii. 23), becomes the shield of Abraham (Gen. xv. 1), and is with Moses (Ex. iii. 12; iv. 12, 15) and with Israel (Targ. Yer. to Num. x. 35, 36; Isa. lxiii. 14). It is the Memra, [The Word] not God Himself, against whom man offends (Ex. xvi. 8; Num. xiv. 5; I Kings viii. 50; II Kings xix. 28; Isa. i. 2, 16; xlv. 3, 20; Hos. v. 7, vi. 7; Targ. Yer. to Lev. v. 21, vi. 2; Deut. v. 11); through His Memra Israel shall be justified (Targ. Isa. xlv. 25); with the Memra Israel stands in communion (Targ. Josh. xxii. 24, 27); in the Memra man puts his trust (Targ. Gen. xv. 6; Targ. Yer. to Ex. xiv. 31; Jer. xxxix. 18, xlix. 11).

Like the Shekinah (comp. Targ. Num. xxiii. 21), the Memra is accordingly the manifestation of God. "The Memra [The Word] brings Israel nigh unto God and sits on His throne receiving the prayers of Israel" " (Targ. Yer. to Deut. iv. 7). . . So, in the future, shall the Memra [The Word] be the comforter (Targ. Isa. lxvi. 13): "My Shekinah I shall put among you, My Memra [My Word] shall be unto you for a redeeming deity, and you shall be unto My Name a holy people" (Targ. Yer. to Lev. xxii. 12).

The Memra is "the witness" (Targ. Yer. xxix. 23); it will be to Israel like a father (l.c. xxxi. 9) and "will rejoice over them to do them good" (l.c. xxxii. 41). "In the Memra [The Word] the redemption will be found " (Targ. Zech. xii. 5).

Jewish Encylopædia online
 
Upvote 0
Oct 4, 2013
430
9
✟15,609.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Since Jesus is the Word of the Lord made flesh, and the Word of the Lord is divine, then Jesus is divine, and can be worshiped. As Christians have been doing for 2,000 years.

Here's another appearance of the Word of the Lord in Jewish thought; they prayed to him:



The next time you see Christians praying to Jesus, the Word of God made flesh, remember that Jews were already praying to him before he took on flesh and was born to Mary. :)

We pray through Jesus as he is God's mediator don't you understand we ask our prayers through Jesus Christ and his Father is the hearer of prayer.

(John 14:6) 6 Jesus said to him: “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.
 
Upvote 0

ChetSinger

Well-Known Member
Apr 18, 2006
3,518
650
✟124,958.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
We pray through Jesus as he is God's mediator don't you understand we ask our prayers through Jesus Christ and his Father is the hearer of prayer.
I understand. But pre-Christian Jews prayed to the Word of the Lord, who sat on a throne. And then he became flesh in the form of Jesus of Nazareth.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums