Important Facts about Evolution

[toolmanjantzi]

How did I come to that conclusion? A combination of personal experiences and thinking about it.

But your absolute for good and evil was your own scale. Seems biased.

 

[PsychoSarah]

Why would it be in trouble. Also I never meant existence of a photon. I said would there be evidence for a photon if there was no object to hit?

Does the answer matter if no such situation could possibly exist?

 

[PsychoSarah]

But your absolute for good and evil was your own scale. Seems biased.

We are all biased in our own ways.

 

[RickG]

God is light. Yet you measure him.

So God said, let there be God?

 

[PsychoSarah]

So God said, let there be God?

 

[justlookinla]

So God said, let there be God?

God would not to say let there be God for God already was.

 

[toolmanjantzi]

Does the answer matter if no such situation could possibly exist?

Could or ever? You then are claiming a constant.

A object of mass has always been, and since you require energy of some sort photons were also constant. This is the Big Bang. Theory or Hypothesis?

 

[toolmanjantzi]

We are all biased in our own ways.

That would make us prideful, selfish, and arrogant. Seems to me those are not exactly a picture of Mother Threasa?

 

[toolmanjantzi]

So God said, let there be God?

God has to be eternal. God is the constant in the equation of life. Science proves that a constant is required, but don't claim to know what; or does it?

 

[Gracchus]

God has to be eternal.

Why?

God is the constant in the equation of life.

God is a number?
Is God between 1 and 10? Maybe god is Pi?!

Science proves that a constant is required, ...

Where is this constant required and where and how was this constant reported? Can you show the equation or formula where the constant appears? Or are you just emitting halitosis?

... but don't (doesn't?) claim to know what; or does it?

If that is so, then why are fairies and unicorns blue? (From a nonsense premise you can deduce anything. It is called "reductio ad absurdum", and your post is nothing if not absurd.

 

[MuchWiser]

God has to be eternal. God is the constant in the equation of life. Science proves that a constant is required, but don't claim to know what; or does it?

Your God exists only in your head, that's as constant as it will get until you stop believing then your God will be no more.

 

[DogmaHunter]

Curious about what you mean by stupid ideas. OEC? Just asking.

The mythology in general. Deism doesn't really have that.

 

[Strathos]

Your God exists only in your head, that's as constant as it will get until you stop believing then your God will be no more.

Comments like this aren't helping

 

[PsychoSarah]

That would make us prideful, selfish, and arrogant. Seems to me those are not exactly a picture of Mother Threasa?

Bias doesn't equate to those qualities. Even a saint can be biased.

 

[PsychoSarah]

Could or ever? You then are claiming a constant.

A object of mass has always been, and since you require energy of some sort photons were also constant. This is the Big Bang. Theory or Hypothesis?

Look, photons are produced by atoms. The existence of atoms is independent however of the existence of photons in the sense that atoms can exist without creating photons. Therefore, trying to devise some theoretical situation of photons without any mass for them to collide with is nonsense, because they can't exist without atoms, but there isn't a dilemma, because atoms can exist without photons.

 

[MuchWiser]

Your God exists only in your head, that's as constant as it will get until you stop believing then your God will be no more.

Comments like this aren't helping

I would like to know why you think that? since when has telling the truth not helped in the long run?

 

[PsychoSarah]

I would like to know why you think that? since when has telling the truth not helped in the long run?

Because to be frank, you told it in a rather rude way. Just because we are atheists doesn't mean we have to call the beliefs of others stupid or nonsense.

 

[MuchWiser]

Because to be frank, you told it in a rather rude way. Just because we are atheists doesn't mean we have to call the beliefs of others stupid or nonsense.

That's exactly what I was doing, being frank.
Surly that would depend on whether the beliefs are stupid and nonsense wouldn't it? belief without evidence is stupid.

Treating stupid claims as if they are stupid claims should surly be the norm, why beat around the bush?
Would you say that telling us they have an invisible friend is insulting our intelligence? they don't think twice about offending us but we must always consider their feelings, why is that? people talking to them as if they are stupid and they don't understand must surly be even more offensive to them, we know they think like children but there is no need to speak to them like children.

They can't even tell us what it is they actually believe because they don't know themselves so why shouldn't we tell them?

 

[toolmanjantzi]

Your God exists only in your head, that's as constant as it will get until you stop believing then your God will be no more.

If God was based on human belief that wouldn't make him God.

 

[toolmanjantzi]

Bias doesn't equate to those qualities. Even a saint can be biased.

So then you agree that no man is good. That what I believe also.