• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

A question for Old Earth Creationists

Subduction Zone

Regular Member
Dec 17, 2012
32,629
12,069
✟230,471.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
The fact is that there are many different sects of Christianity that have many different interpretations of the Bible. Some of them are not even Christian sects according to the rules of this site. I think both the Mormons and the Jehovah Witnesses would count as "non-Christian" here. The Mormons because of their additional books and the Jehovah's Witnesses since they don't accept the Trinity.

The Bible is not clear. Theologians will argue over the smallest of differences. There are multiple dates in Christianity for the Daniel prophecies.

Does anyone disagree with any of this?
 
Upvote 0

EternalDragon

Counselor
Jul 31, 2013
5,757
26
✟28,767.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Republican
The fact is that there are many different sects of Christianity that have many different interpretations of the Bible. Some of them are not even Christian sects according to the rules of this site. I think both the Mormons and the Jehovah Witnesses would count as "non-Christian" here. The Mormons because of their additional books and the Jehovah's Witnesses since they don't accept the Trinity.

The Bible is not clear. Theologians will argue over the smallest of differences. There are multiple dates in Christianity for the Daniel prophecies.

Does anyone disagree with any of this?

Sorry, can't interpret your words. Not clear enough.
 
Upvote 0

Oncedeceived

Senior Veteran
Jul 11, 2003
21,214
629
✟66,870.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Forgive me then if I don't reply as your words are too vaguely written for me to interpret them. I mean, what does "sect" mean? It could mean anything.

It is obvious. Oh well. IF you don't see the name "Jesus" it means He wasn't there, I think it is very obvious He is and was the Creator God.

Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear.


The word being Jesus Christ.
 
Upvote 0

Oncedeceived

Senior Veteran
Jul 11, 2003
21,214
629
✟66,870.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The fact is that there are many different sects of Christianity that have many different interpretations of the Bible. Some of them are not even Christian sects according to the rules of this site.

I think both the Mormons and the Jehovah Witnesses would count as "non-Christian" here. The Mormons because of their additional books and the Jehovah's Witnesses since they don't accept the Trinity.

They have the book of Mormons which is not the Bible and Jehovah's witnesses do not adhere to the gospel given in Jesus's time which means it is heresy.

The Bible is not clear. Theologians will argue over the smallest of differences. There are multiple dates in Christianity for the Daniel prophecies.

What are you saying here?
Does anyone disagree with any of this?

I do. There are main core issues of the Christian doctrine given in the New Testament that are to be followed to be Christians.
 
Upvote 0

Subduction Zone

Regular Member
Dec 17, 2012
32,629
12,069
✟230,471.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
It is obvious. Oh well. IF you don't see the name "Jesus" it means He wasn't there, I think it is very obvious He is and was the Creator God.

Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear.


The word being Jesus Christ.

That is your interpretation of the Bible. Others will have equally valid interpretations. I think you are also getting a little confused with who E.D. is responding to.

But then E.D. probably does not know that himself:p
 
Upvote 0

Oncedeceived

Senior Veteran
Jul 11, 2003
21,214
629
✟66,870.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
That is your interpretation of the Bible. Others will have equally valid interpretations. I think you are also getting a little confused with who E.D. is responding to.

But then E.D. probably does not know that himself:p

Like I said there are core beliefs that are based on New Testament teaching that if not followed are considered heresy.
 
Upvote 0

Subduction Zone

Regular Member
Dec 17, 2012
32,629
12,069
✟230,471.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
The fact is that there are many different sects of Christianity that have many different interpretations of the Bible. Some of them are not even Christian sects according to the rules of this site.



They have the book of Mormons which is not the Bible and Jehovah's witnesses do not adhere to the gospel given in Jesus's time which means it is heresy.

I am not either, but I assure you that they would disagree with you and would love to discuss it with you for hours in your home. Both sects love to do that. I have had both come up to my door. Not at the same time, but that could be a real party!



What are you saying here?

The famous Daniel prophesy about the church being destroyed and rebuilt after a specific number of days or years. There are many different interpretations of the dates. For example my brother is a Seventh Day Adventist and they put a relatively early date to that event. Many of them think we are already in the End Times. Other sects have other interpretations of the date. There is no one set date for that event.


I do. There are main core issues of the Christian doctrine given in the New Testament that are to be followed to be Christians.

Yes, there are. But some Christians will even disagree on such basic things as whether works are important or not. Your interpretations are probably not the same as other Christians. In fact I am sure of it.
 
Upvote 0

Subduction Zone

Regular Member
Dec 17, 2012
32,629
12,069
✟230,471.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Like I said there are core beliefs that are based on New Testament teaching that if not followed are considered heresy.

By you. Not by them. Many of your beliefs would have been "heretical" to the Catholic Church before the reformation. Does that make them heresy?

Heresy is in the eye of the beholder.
 
Upvote 0

Oncedeceived

Senior Veteran
Jul 11, 2003
21,214
629
✟66,870.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I am not either, but I assure you that they would disagree with you and would love to discuss it with you for hours in your home. Both sects love to do that. I have had both come up to my door. Not at the same time, but that could be a real party!

No doubt.

The famous Daniel prophesy about the church being destroyed and rebuilt after a specific number of days or years. There are many different interpretations of the dates. For example my brother is a Seventh Day Adventist and they put a relatively early date to that event. Many of them think we are already in the End Times. Other sects have other interpretations of the date. There is no one set date for that event.
Here are some facts:

[FONT=Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,Swiss,SunSans-Regular]Dead Sea Scrolls.[/FONT][FONT=Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,Swiss,SunSans-Regular] When was Daniel written? The Dead Sea Scrolls provide the first proof that the book of Daniel existed before 165 BC, since Daniel was found among the manuscripts at Qumran. This early date is the result of radiocarbon dating of the Dead Sea manuscripts of Daniel. They imply that earlier copies of the book with older dates already existed. This is important because Daniel predicted the fall of Babylon (605-539 B.C.), Media-Persia (539-331 B.C.), Greece (331-146 B.C.) and then Rome (331-146 B.C.). Daniel also predicts the time of Jesus’ death (33 A.D.). The Dead Sea Scrolls prove that at least one prophecy, the prophecy about Jesus’ existence on earth to be real.
The Septuagint. There is another proof that the book of Daniel existed before Jesus was alive on this earth. This proof involves the Septuagint, which is also known as the LXX. The LXX is a Greek translation of the Old Testament. Jewish tradition says that seventy scribes translated the Hebrew Bible into Greek between 285 BC and 247 BC. Since the Septuagint contains the book of Daniel, we know that the book of Daniel existed even earlier in time.

[/FONT]
date.gif
[FONT=Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,Swiss,SunSans-Regular]
[/FONT] [FONT=Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,Swiss,SunSans-Regular]Book of Josephus.[/FONT][FONT=Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,Swiss,SunSans-Regular] Josephus states that the book of Daniel was shown to Alexander the Great when he approached the city of Jerusalem (Josephus, Antiquities of the Jews, Book XI, chapter VIII, section 5). History says that Alexander the Great approached Jerusalem around 331 BC. This means that the book of Daniel existed before this event. It predicted that Jerusalem would be conquered by Greece. Some critics will accept Josephus’ other accounts as being accurate, yet dispute this fact. [/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,Swiss,SunSans-Regular]The Jewish Tradition.[/FONT][FONT=Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,Swiss,SunSans-Regular] Long standing Jewish tradition says that the book of Daniel existed before 450 BC. While this is not solid proof, it is consistent with the next fact.
[FONT=Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,Swiss,SunSans-Regular]Ezekiel's Reference.[/FONT] Most critics widely accept the book of Ezekiel as being written between 586 BC and 538 BC. What is fascinating is that the author, Ezekiel, refers to Daniel in Ezekiel 14:14, 20. This implies that Daniel was alive during his time. Daniel claims to be the author (Daniel 12:4) of the book which bears his name and to have lived during the life of Nebuchadnezzar (Daniel 1-2) and Darius (Dan. 9:1). This implies that Daniel was a contemporary of Ezekiel and lived to see the fall of Babylon (Dan. 5:30-31).
[FONT=Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,Swiss,SunSans-Regular]Internal Evidence.[/FONT] For decades, the critics said the proof that Daniel was written near Christ’s time is found in the Greek names of musical instruments recorded in the book and in the fact that a portion of Daniel was written in Aramaic. After excavations in Babylonia and Assyria, it has become clear that the musical instruments (lyre, sackbut, and trigon) mentioned in Daniel 3 do not have Greek names (which would argue for a later date for Daniel), but Babylonian names from the seventh century (600 B.C.). These instruments originated in Old Persia and were then assimilated by the Greeks.
[/FONT]
 
Upvote 0

bhsmte

Newbie
Apr 26, 2013
52,761
11,792
✟254,941.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
:thumbsup:



Same here. By viewing Genesis as a non literal story about creation, one does not have to "quote mine" other scripture and add made up science in order to believe in God. I guess like most Christians, at first I tried to reason with myself creation events and science, OEC, GAP, etc. The more I looked at it, the more I saw how non scientific it was.

It appears to me, that when you look at certain fundamentalists Christians, they are more threatened by Christians like yourself, who are highly educated in science and understand it, then they are of atheists.
 
Upvote 0

Oncedeceived

Senior Veteran
Jul 11, 2003
21,214
629
✟66,870.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
By you. Not by them. Many of your beliefs would have been "heretical" to the Catholic Church before the reformation. Does that make them heresy?

Heresy is in the eye of the beholder.

The Bible is clear on the subject, people who do not agree do so against what the Bible clearly states.

But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.
 
Upvote 0

Oncedeceived

Senior Veteran
Jul 11, 2003
21,214
629
✟66,870.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
It appears to me, that when you look at certain fundamentalists Christians, they are more threatened by Christians like yourself, who are highly educated in science and understand it, then they are of atheists.

You misinterpret the comments being made then.
 
Upvote 0

Subduction Zone

Regular Member
Dec 17, 2012
32,629
12,069
✟230,471.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
The Bible is clear on the subject, people who do not agree do so against what the Bible clearly states.

But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.

Yet you will have other Christians with strongly different views than you. Not just the Jehovah's Witnesses and the Mormons. And in fact your views may be heresy to them. Internecine wars are often the worst when it comes to the treatment of the other side. In the past if there were no Muslims or Jews to attack Christians would regularly attack each other.

But I am not interested in debating interpretation of scripture. I was merely pointing out that that there are other Christians that would disagree with you. No matter what part of the Bible you chose to interpret. Obvious to you is not obvious to them.
 
Upvote 0

Dizredux

Newbie
Dec 20, 2013
2,465
69
✟18,021.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
It appears to me, that when you look at certain fundamentalists Christians, they are more threatened by Christians like yourself, who are highly educated in science and understand it, then they are of atheists.
I tend to agree. The anger that some fundamentalists aim at atheists is nothing compared to the fury they aim at those they see as "Not a True Christian" AKA anyone who does not agree with their particular interpretation of the Bible.

For evidence, just look at comments made by some fundamentalists toward Catholics and the Catholic Church. (Don't want to brush all fundamentalists with the same brush. I have found many to be quite reasonable.)


Dizredux
 
Upvote 0

EternalDragon

Counselor
Jul 31, 2013
5,757
26
✟28,767.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Republican
For evidence, just look at comments made by some fundamentalists toward Catholics and the Catholic Church. (Don't want to brush all fundamentalists with the same brush. I have found many to be quite reasonable.)


Dizredux

There is a very good reason for that.
 
Upvote 0

bhsmte

Newbie
Apr 26, 2013
52,761
11,792
✟254,941.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
I tend to agree. The anger that some fundamentalists aim at atheists is nothing compared to the fury they aim at those they see as "Not a True Christian" AKA anyone who does not agree with their particular interpretation of the Bible.

For evidence, just look at comments made by some fundamentalists toward Catholics and the Catholic Church. (Don't want to brush all fundamentalists with the same brush. I have found many to be quite reasonable.)


Dizredux

Yes, I believe it is quite obvious. Some want to hold onto their personal (or church's) interpretation of the bible and anything that goes against that must be blasphemy.
 
Upvote 0

bhsmte

Newbie
Apr 26, 2013
52,761
11,792
✟254,941.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
There is a very good reason for that.

Sure you have your reasons and others have theirs. It is a never ending circle, my interpretation is better than your interpretation.

It reminds me of five year olds battling over who's dad can beat up the other dad.
 
Upvote 0

Delphiki

Well-Known Member
May 7, 2010
4,342
162
Ohio
✟5,685.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others
John was to bare witness of him and he did that with Jesus. He became flesh and dwelt among us. Keep reading John and you will find the name of Jesus. Either your reading comprehension is really off or you are just being extremely obtuse with us.


No, I totally get it. The passages do eventually clarify that Jesus is God in the flesh. It says God, who created the universe, in the flesh, is Jesus. God didn't create the universe as Jesus (i.e. while in the flesh). God was born and died as a human as Jesus. Jesus, the physical flesh and blood aspect of God, doesn't move through your body and fill you up (that's kind of disturbing, actually) -- it's the Spirit.

Did the Holy Spirit die on the cross?
 
Upvote 0

EternalDragon

Counselor
Jul 31, 2013
5,757
26
✟28,767.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Republican
No, I totally get it. The passages do eventually clarify that Jesus is God in the flesh. It says God, who created the universe, in the flesh, is Jesus. God didn't create the universe as Jesus (i.e. while in the flesh). God was born and died as a human as Jesus. Jesus, the physical flesh and blood aspect of God, doesn't move through your body and fill you up (that's kind of disturbing, actually) -- it's the Spirit.

Did the Holy Spirit die on the cross?

God, as a human, died on the cross. The Holy Spirit can't die.
 
Upvote 0