- Sep 7, 2009
- 44,343
- 3,067
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Charismatic
- Marital Status
- Widowed
- Politics
- US-Republican
Of course your past, present and future sins are forgiven, they have to be, or else Christ would have to suffer often, even now for the new sins, commited even by those of people being born today, who will sin.
But, It says eternal redemption in Hebrews 9:12.
If it were not so, then whenever one sinned, even tomorrow, there would have to be a suffering Christ again, to cover a persons new sin. But eternal redemption means the future sins are already forgiven too, unless people think Christ wants to be recrucified?
The repeated sins would need another sacrifice, only if the one time, for all sins sacrifice, was not an eternal sacrifice.
Thats why Hebrews 10:18, says where there has been forgiveness, no more sacrifices are needed, not OT ones, or that of our Lord on the cross. It is done, Jesus has>>
Hebrews 9:12 he entered once for all into the holy places, not by means of the blood of goats and calves but by means of his own blood, thus securing an eternal redemption.
People say the cross went backwards in time in Rom 3:25, to the previously overlooked sins. Ok, why cant the cross go foward also, to future sins?
Again, if the one time atonement was not eternal, a one time event, to take away all sins from believers, the text shows that He would have to>>>>
Hebrews 9:25 Nor was it to offer himself repeatedly, as the high priest enters the holy places every year with blood not his own, 26 for then he would have had to suffer repeatedly since the foundation of the world. But as it is, he has appeared once for all at the end of the ages to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself.
Verse 26 says once for all, put away sin, that would mean even future sins!
It has to be, there is no other conclusion.
If it were not eternal, like in the temple times, annual and daily offerings would have to continue to keep covering new sins, but that is not so with the eternal redemption, Christ secured. No more daily or yearly sacrifices, temple ways, we have eternal redemption forever! Sin forever removed, not covered!
Than you Jesus! The lamb of God who took away the sin!
But, It says eternal redemption in Hebrews 9:12.
If it were not so, then whenever one sinned, even tomorrow, there would have to be a suffering Christ again, to cover a persons new sin. But eternal redemption means the future sins are already forgiven too, unless people think Christ wants to be recrucified?
The repeated sins would need another sacrifice, only if the one time, for all sins sacrifice, was not an eternal sacrifice.
Thats why Hebrews 10:18, says where there has been forgiveness, no more sacrifices are needed, not OT ones, or that of our Lord on the cross. It is done, Jesus has>>
Hebrews 9:12 he entered once for all into the holy places, not by means of the blood of goats and calves but by means of his own blood, thus securing an eternal redemption.
People say the cross went backwards in time in Rom 3:25, to the previously overlooked sins. Ok, why cant the cross go foward also, to future sins?
Again, if the one time atonement was not eternal, a one time event, to take away all sins from believers, the text shows that He would have to>>>>
Hebrews 9:25 Nor was it to offer himself repeatedly, as the high priest enters the holy places every year with blood not his own, 26 for then he would have had to suffer repeatedly since the foundation of the world. But as it is, he has appeared once for all at the end of the ages to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself.
Verse 26 says once for all, put away sin, that would mean even future sins!
It has to be, there is no other conclusion.
If it were not eternal, like in the temple times, annual and daily offerings would have to continue to keep covering new sins, but that is not so with the eternal redemption, Christ secured. No more daily or yearly sacrifices, temple ways, we have eternal redemption forever! Sin forever removed, not covered!
Than you Jesus! The lamb of God who took away the sin!