Which came first? plants or animals?

[Riberra]

Creation.com is not AIG

There really isn't that much of a difference between the two. Creation.com articles tend to be a little longer, that's all.

Well, after doing some digging i discover that creation.com was formally Answer In Genesis.
Creation Ministries International

That
The debunking site (see down their home page)is affiliated with Australian Skeptics Inc.

That
Dr Tasman Bruce Walker have a
Ph.D in Engineering, honours degree in Geology

Credentials of the other members
About Us - creation.com

Original article by :
Dr Tasman Bruce Walker

Three Sisters: evidence for Noah's Flood - creation.com

 

[lasthero]

what I find written in the books of the bible is nothing short of miraculous.

Have you ever read any other religious texts? The Koran, the Vedas, anything?

 

[AV1611VET]

Have you ever read any other religious texts? The Koran, the Vedas, anything?

I read the sequel to Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life (Mein Kampf).

Didn't care for it though.

 

[Dizredux]

I read the sequel to Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life (Mein Kampf).

Didn't care for it though.

Oh good grief AV, how Godwin can you get?

I have seen you do much, much better and more cleverly than this.

Dizredux

 

[TLK Valentine]

Oh good grief AV, how Godwin can you get?

I have seen you do much, much better and more cleverly than this.

Dizredux

Desperation does not inspire quality work in AV.

 

[AV1611VET]

Oh good grief AV, how Godwin can you get?

I have seen you do much, much better and more cleverly than this.

Dizredux

I'm sorry, Dizredux, but I think just as much about Charles Darwin as I do Adolf Hitler.

That is, not at all.

 

[PsychoSarah]

I read the sequel to Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life (Mein Kampf).

Didn't care for it though.

But why?

 

[AV1611VET]

But why?

Why what?

Why did I read it?

 

[PsychoSarah]

Why what?

Why did I read it?

Yeah

 

[Dizredux]

I'm sorry, Dizredux, but I think just as much about Charles Darwin as I do Adolf Hitler.

That is, not at all.

Think about it, no matter how much you dislike his ideas Darwin was apparently a kind gentle man who did little personal harm, loved his family and worried about how his theory would affect others.

To compare him to Hitler is, at least to my mind, very much over the top especially for a Christian. I really think your comparison reflects much more about you than Darwin.

Dizredux

 

[AV1611VET]

Yeah

It was a LONG time ago, and I had to do a book report in school.

I only read the first 9 chapters, then quit.

Looking back, I see that my selection of that book wouldn't have been too popular; but at the time, I had no idea what it was.

And at the time, I didn't know Hitler from Darwin.

They both seemed to be saying the same thing.

 

[PsychoSarah]

It was a LONG time ago, and I had to do a book report in school.

I only read the first 9 chapters, then quit.

Looking back, I see that my selection of that book wouldn't have been too popular; but at the time, I had no idea what it was.

And at the time, I didn't know Hitler from Darwin.

They both seemed to be saying the same thing.

Eugenics is basically the worst misuse of evolutionary theory ever. It is the incorrect conclusion that evolution of the fittest meant that there had to be a superior human race and culture, and that for the "fittest" to succeed, the weakest must die, which isn't true. Evolution doesn't need the "weak" to perish at all, and "fit" is just a measure of reproductive success, nothing more.

Eugenics is what Hitler partly used to justify his actions.

 

[AV1611VET]

Eugenics is basically the worst misuse of evolutionary theory ever. It is the incorrect conclusion that evolution of the fittest meant that there had to be a superior human race and culture, and that for the "fittest" to succeed, the weakest must die, which isn't true. Evolution doesn't need the "weak" to perish at all, and "fit" is just a measure of reproductive success, nothing more.

I don't think Hitler was familiar with diminutive inbreeding -- (or whatever that term is that says selective breeding won't work).

Keeping impurities from entering genes is actually allowing the impurities that are already in the genes to thrive -- (or something like that).

Eugenics is what Hitler partly used to justify his actions.

I believe that was his means to achieve his ends; but let's face it, things get overlooked.

QV Thalidomide.

What's the difference?

Scientists wanted to make life easier for pre-natal women.

They just didn't take everything into consideration.

 

[TLK Valentine]

I'm sorry, Dizredux, but I think just as much about Charles Darwin as I do Adolf Hitler.

That is, not at all.

You do a lot of talking about them, considering you claim not to think about them at all.

But then again, we've seen you do a lot of talking without thinking.

 

[AV1611VET]

You do a lot of talking about them,

I totally disagree.

 

[Gene2memE]

It was a LONG time ago, and I had to do a book report in school.

I only read the first 9 chapters, then quit.

Looking back, I see that my selection of that book wouldn't have been too popular; but at the time, I had no idea what it was.

And at the time, I didn't know Hitler from Darwin.

They both seemed to be saying the same thing.

If you think that, you know nothing of substance about either.

 

[AV1611VET]

If you think that, you know nothing of substance about either.

[shrugs shoulders] GUILTY as charged. [/shrugs shoulders]

 

[EternalDragon]

Have you ever read any other religious texts? The Koran, the Vedas, anything?

Yep, read them both.

 

[EternalDragon]

According to what? Where does the idea that the Bible was written direct from God come from?



Again, according to what? Where do you get the idea that God is the main eyewitness?

It is right there in the many books of the bible, stated over and over and over.

 

[lasthero]

Yep, read them both.

You read the entire Vedas. And the Koran.

Right.