What Would Falsify the Flood? (2)

[Loudmouth]

This thread was split automatically after 1000 replies and this thread has been automatically created.
The old thread automatically closed is here: "What Would Falsify the Flood?"

 

[Black Akuma]

Not only did water not behave according to present laws such as thermodynamics, but mass such as land and rock would have not produced or retrained great heat!

How else could oceans of water fall from space? How could the continents have quickly separated?

That doesn't really answer my question. Does water turn to steam in this different state? If not, why not?

 

[Black Akuma]

Not only did water not behave according to present laws such as thermodynamics, but mass such as land and rock would have not produced or retrained great heat!

How else could oceans of water fall from space? How could the continents have quickly separated?

That doesn't really answer my question. Does water turn to steam in this different state? If not, why not?

 

[dad]

That doesn't really answer my question. Does water turn to steam in this different state? If not, why not?

The reason that atoms do what they do is because of forces we have in place. If they were different, one might as well ask...why should they produce great killing heat????

TKValentine

The entire model is weak, dad -- without knowing anything about the past state, all Walt has is speculation, right?

In what way is his model weak? Is there some reason to think they was no big lake that could drain, or...???

 

[TLK Valentine]

In what way is his model weak? Is there some reason to think they was no big lake that could drain, or...???

You're the one who said water didn't behave according to present laws back then -- backpedaling already, dad?

 

[Black Akuma]

The reason that atoms do what they do is because of forces we have in place. If they were different, one might as well ask...why should they produce great killing heat????

So there was no heat in this past state? Were things composed of atoms, at least?

 

[Subduction Zone]

So there was no heat in this past state? Were things composed of atoms, at least?

dad is quick to claim things. He never ever gives evidence for his claims.

 

[dad]

You're the one who said water didn't behave according to present laws back then -- backpedaling already, dad?

How could water behave with laws from another state and time?? Try to make sense.

 

[dad]

So there was no heat in this past state? Were things composed of atoms, at least?

I assume there were atoms. How else could we have ratios of isotopes that were left when we entered this state?

 

[paul becke]

'What features would a geologic feature need in order to falsify a recent global flood?'
An absence of features attesting to a flood, foolishness!

The posts on this UD thread on the subject of the Flood are interesting:

Creationist movie starring Russell Crowe to hit theaters in 2014 | Uncommon Descent

 

[dad]

'What features would a geologic feature need in order to falsify a recent global flood?'
An absence of features attesting to a flood, foolishness!

If you ever find any features that are a challenge let us know.

 

[Orogeny]

Really? 1000 replies to a thread that begs the question RIGHT IN THE TITLE?

Oh CF, you will never change.

 

[AV1611VET]

Q: What Would Falsify the Flood?

A: Nephilim.

 

[TLK Valentine]

How could water behave with laws from another state and time?? Try to make sense.

So now you're saying that water behaved back then just as it does now. You've just debunked your own "different state past" argument.

 

[TLK Valentine]

Q: What Would Falsify the Flood?

A: Nephilim.

How so?

 

[AV1611VET]

How so?

Do you see any today?

 

[TLK Valentine]

Do you see any today?

What do they look like?

 

[AV1611VET]

What do they look like?

Their existence would falsify the Flood, since the Flood was designed to destroy them.

And you would certainly know if they existed or not.

The fact that they are gone, shows the Flood to have been not only real, but worldwide.

 

[TLK Valentine]

Their existence would falsify the Flood, since the Flood was designed to destroy them.

And you would certainly know if they existed or not.

The fact that they are gone, shows the Flood to have been not only real, but worldwide.

What. Do. They. Look. Like?

 

[Delphiki]

Their existence would falsify the Flood, since the Flood was designed to destroy them.

And you would certainly know if they existed or not.

The fact that they are gone, shows the Flood to have been not only real, but worldwide.

By your same reasoning, the suggestion of the following image that Odin exists is true: