• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

The Sandy Hook Shooting - Fully Exposed

spiritualwarrior77

Senior Member
Apr 28, 2012
862
10
✟16,297.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
Oh my. I just read a reviewer's synopsis of that book on Amazon and I don't know if I could read it. That from someone who considers himself able to stomach uncomfortable truths. Got nauseous just reading the review.

Yes... it is an extremely heavy read!
I was familiar with the material in it from previous research so I got through it OK, but when I first encountered this stuff, it sent me spinning!

One you come to realise that this stuff is real, you go through some of the most difficult emotions possible.

Pure evil exists... here on planet Earth!!! :o

Pure love also exists... thank Christ for that!!! :)
 
Upvote 0

Calvinator

It's midnight and I'm sound asleep
Nov 13, 2012
525
15
✟788.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I would pose a similar question to you...can you name a popular conspiracy that (you think) involves the government that you don't believe in? JFK, 9/11, Waco, Aurora shooting, Newtown shooting, Osama Bin Laden's death...etc.? Please point out which ones you think are supported by real facts, and which ones are just the result of people projecting their distrust of government into wild speculation and reactionary explanations.


Btodd

...FEMA death camps with automated guillotines and millions of coffins stacked and reaxy, faked Moon landing, Ruby Ridge, Oklahoma City, the Long Island missile attack, MK Ultra, and Agenda 21... I think thats most of them?

Keeping in mind this thread is primarily about the Sandy Hook incident, going into detail about what is listed in the quotes above is, well, inappropriate. Here are my answers:

JFK - I don't believe the "lone gunman" explanation, and I suspect the CIA was behind it for various reasons

9/11 - I'll just say this, after all that has come out about this event, if a person still believes 19 hijackers with box-cutters were responsible for 3 buildings coming down because "they hate our freedoms", I believe such a person is living in a corporate fantasy world they are unwilling to depart from.

Waco - I really don't know much about this at all to have an opinion.

Aurora - I doubt the official story based on inconsistent witness accounts, obvious (to me, anyway) actors and dodging/ignoring important questions, such as if the cinema had camera surveillance, and other factors. However, I do not claim to know exactly what happened.

Newtown - Obviously I doubt the official story of this event for multiple reasons

Bin Laden's death - er, you mean the recent death Obama took credit for? I already believed Bin Laden was dead long before and the video and audio attributed to him in more recent years was an actor. Scarecrow to keep the "war on terror" going.

FEMA death camps - I don't know for sure. It's within the realm of possibility just like Germany's concentration camps, or even America's concentration camps for the Japanese during WW2, but I haven't done much in depth looking into it.

Moon landing - I have my doubts, but I do not know for sure.

Ruby Ridge - I know next to nothing about this to have an opinion.

OK City bombing - Doubt official story based on a few things I've read, but don't know enough about

Long Island Missile attack - I know next to nothing about this to have an opinion.

MKUltra - Is not a "conspiracy theory" but a fact of history. I suspect such research has continued "off the record", not because I have any concrete facts that I've looked into (I haven't), but to ease the public's discomfort over it and to continue valuable (to entities like the CIA and others) research. Note: "I suspect" doesn't mean "I know"

Agenda 21 - I have read a little, but don't know enough about this to have an opinion either way.
 
Upvote 0

spiritualwarrior77

Senior Member
Apr 28, 2012
862
10
✟16,297.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
Keeping in mind this thread is primarily about the Sandy Hook incident, going into detail about what is listed in the quotes above is, well, inappropriate. Here are my answers:

JFK - I don't believe the "lone gunman" explanation, and I suspect the CIA was behind it for various reasons

9/11 - I'll just say this, after all that has come out about this event, if a person still believes 19 hijackers with box-cutters were responsible for 3 buildings coming down because "they hate our freedoms", I believe such a person is living in a corporate fantasy world they are unwilling to depart from.

Waco - I really don't know much about this at all to have an opinion.

Aurora - I doubt the official story based on inconsistent witness accounts, obvious (to me, anyway) actors and dodging/ignoring important questions, such as if the cinema had camera surveillance, and other factors. However, I do not claim to know exactly what happened.

Newtown - Obviously I doubt the official story of this event for multiple reasons

Bin Laden's death - er, you mean the recent death Obama took credit for? I already believed Bin Laden was dead long before and the video and audio attributed to him in more recent years was an actor. Scarecrow to keep the "war on terror" going.

FEMA death camps - I don't know for sure. It's within the realm of possibility just like Germany's concentration camps, or even America's concentration camps for the Japanese during WW2, but I haven't done much in depth looking into it.

Moon landing - I have my doubts, but I do not know for sure.

Ruby Ridge - I know next to nothing about this to have an opinion.

OK City bombing - Doubt official story based on a few things I've read, but don't know enough about

Long Island Missile attack - I know next to nothing about this to have an opinion.

MKUltra - Is not a "conspiracy theory" but a fact of history. I suspect such research has continued "off the record", not because I have any concrete facts that I've looked into (I haven't), but to ease the public's discomfort over it and to continue valuable (to entities like the CIA and others) research. Note: "I suspect" doesn't mean "I know"

Agenda 21 - I have read a little, but don't know enough about this to have an opinion either way.

How refreshing to have someone with their head screwed on right... :thumbsup:

You are obviously thoughtful, intelligent, and have actually done some research.

Hope to hear more form you... :)
 
Upvote 0

Calvinator

It's midnight and I'm sound asleep
Nov 13, 2012
525
15
✟788.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
How refreshing to have someone with their head screwed on right... :thumbsup:

You are obviously thoughtful, intelligent, and have actually done some research.

Hope to hear more form you... :)

Thank you for that kind comment. :)
 
Upvote 0

guitarmonster

Newbie
Jan 5, 2012
268
9
✟22,958.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
In Relationship
I know this kind of a thing can be hard to accept, being that there we're kids involved and all. People have to realize that a false flag attack is structured in such a way to make sure asking questions would be insensitive. People have the false impression that if you ask questions about obvious evidence, that you are somehow insulting the memory of those who we're lost. That's why false flag attacks usually have a hero story to go along with them. That way if you dare say anything, someone will end up punching you in the face screaming "don't you dare insult these heroes". Now if anyone on here is interested in actual evidence instead of caving to their feelings then please keep reading. There are a few different aspects of this case that fall right in line with a common false flag event:

1. Manufactured confusion - Obviously every single news agency has a completely different version of the story. One reporter says she spoke with the school nurse on the street (even though the nurse was in the school), another news source says the shooter was Ryan Lanza, and that his little brother was in custody for questioning. Nobody can tell us exactly what guns we're used and where they we're. Basically overall the whole thing is confusing, this makes the common viewer give up on getting the truth for themselves. Instead the common viewer subconsciously feels that maybe they just failed to keep up with the news properly, so they get into a mode where they assume the news will "catch them up", at this point they will accept anything.

2. Heroes - Once again we have heroes, even though every time I hear about a shooting in Camden, NJ, which is literally all the time, I can't remember the last time I heard of any heroes. The hero aspect like I said puts a thick shield over the conspiracy, because most people will rebuke you for even questioning it.

Now a few weeks ago, I was really confused as to why the news stations could not get their stories straight. So I decided to take things right to the horses mouth, and that horse is Lt. Paul Vance from CT State Police. I started communicating with him through email asking about the shooting. At first he was pretty cooperative, he did give me some details, but not much. He confirmed that the weapon in the trunk was a shotgun, he said the shooter killed himself with a handgun and that the victims we're killed by the AR-15. I then put up some of the transcript from the police radio communications where officers we're chasing down and apprehending additional suspects. At this point I have not narrowed down the exact number, but it is believed to be almost 6-7 suspects either apprehended or chased by police. After I put up that transcript and asked exactly where the handguns and AR-15 we're found, he ended the conversation. The reason why he ended the conversation is that he understands for one that he has the right to remain silent, and he also understands that any email from his office can be used against him in court. So instead of lying he simply chose to not say anything at all.

Moving forward, I started following a lead about alleged actors and stumbled onto a large collection of photos of the Greenberg family. I was able to recover and store over 1000 photos of this family and used them for analysis. I started with the Phelps family from Sandy Hook. It took only a couple of seconds to see that the Phelps are not who they say they are, they are Jennifer and Nick Greenberg. From that point I continued to look through the photos and noticed that one of their daughters was really familiar. Then I established another connection between Christina Taylor Green, who was an alleged victim of the 2011 shooting in Tuscon, AZ. I compared her photo to many Greenberg family photos and once again a dead match.

At this point I have brought a few experts into this through my company, because at this point I feel there is enough to launch an official investigation.

Here are the Phelps, as interviewed on CNN:
54543656454353.jpg


Here are a few images of the Greenbergs:
Greenberg%20Family%200000584.jpg
Greenberg%20Family%200000592.jpg
Greenberg%20Family%200000594.jpg
Greenberg%2520Family%25200000535.jpg
Greenberg%2520Family%25200000536.jpg
Greenberg%2520Family%25200000538.jpg
Greenberg%2520Family%25200000556.jpg
Greenberg%2520Family%25200000559.jpg
Greenberg%2520Family%25200000586.jpg
Greenberg%2520Family%25200000587.jpg
Greenberg%2520Family%25200000593.jpg
Greenberg%2520Family%25200000603.jpg
Greenberg%2520Family%25200000604.jpg


Those are just a few to get started, the Phelps are obviously the Greenbergs.

Christina Taylor Green (victim from 2011 Tuscon shooting):
147730554.jpg
christinataylorgreen.jpg


As you can see, she is alive and well:

Greenberg%2520Family%25200000163.jpg
Greenberg%2520Family%25200000169.jpg
Greenberg%2520Family%25200000471.jpg
Greenberg%2520Family%25200000474.jpg
Greenberg%2520Family%25200000475.jpg
Greenberg%2520Family%25200000542.jpg
Greenberg%2520Family%25200000580.jpg
Greenberg%2520Family%25200000583.jpg
Greenberg%2520Family%25200000609.jpg
Greenberg%2520Family%25200000613.jpg
Greenberg%2520Family%25200000614.jpg


..and that is just the beginning. There are WAY more leads that are being followed from the Greenberg photo collection.

This photo of the Parker family was altered, this was confirmed by my photographer/graphic designer:

Parker-Family-1.jpg


Download the above image and load it into your favorite image editor. Zoom in around Emilie Parker's head (girl to the far right). You will notice no strands of hair come off her head, also you can see smearing around her head. Her knee is cut off on the bottom right of the photo. There is no shadow on her arm as it's supposed to be somewhat behind her fathers arm.

So many might ask "what does the fact that images we're photoshopped have to do with anything?" I will tell you. One of the biggest methods used by police to get to the real truth is the fact that anyone who lies on a police report can be charged with a crime. If a crime is committed and you fill out a report giving your story, then later on a detective finds out that you have lied, he now has you in a ringer. He is going to interrogate you and use the looming felony charges to get more out of you. At this point, he does not believe ONE THING you have written down, he has no reason to. The news is essentially a "police report" to the people. These people have made their report, signed it, and presented it to the public. Right now there are fundraising campaigns in place for children who appear to be alive. This is a very serious crime, I believe this is actually a federal crime since it crosses state lines. If I we're an investigator, I would myself pursue the fund raising sites. I would subpoena Microsoft, and any other online search engines that cached these pages before the incident. Then threatening heavy charges of fraud, these people would be interrogated with the hopes of them giving up something more. These things can happen, actually I am convinced that they will. The only problem is the government is falling all over themselves trying to disarm the people as fast as they can. They are doing this because we are catching up to them, they are running out of excuses and time. Did you hear about Iceland? They overthrew their government, jailed the banking elite, now they are being prosecuted. I'm sure many have not heard of this, because they will never put that on the news.

Now here is my opinion. I do not believe that this whole thing was staged, I do think that many people lost their lives. I want to be very clear about this. I believe that this was planned in advance, I believe there we're multiple shooters. I have my doubts about Adam Lanza's involvement except to be a patsy, or he may have been in on it, who knows. All I know is we ARE being lied to. I think just the fact that I was able to very easily ask Lt Paul Vance about the gun in the trunk, but news agencies are still communicating false information in regards is an indicator. If I am able to open up dialog with the lead investigator, why couldn't someone from CNN or ABC just send a quick email to get things straight? They didn't because once again, they are spreading multiple versions of the story to bring confusion.

You also have to watch out for misinformation, which is being put out as we speak. One example is people saying that Jennifer Greenberg is James Holmes' lawyer. I've compared the photos and although there is a slight resemblance, I just don't feel like they are the same person. Of course this comparison is what the mainstream media is using to "debunk" the conspiracies. I would love to see them mainstream media take on the photos that I have posted here, but I guarantee they never will.
 
Upvote 0

Skaloop

Agnostic atheist, pro-choice anti-abortion
May 10, 2006
16,332
899
48
Burnaby
Visit site
✟36,546.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-NDP
I know this kind of a thing can be hard to accept, being that there we're kids involved and all. People have to realize that a false flag attack is structured in such a way to make sure asking questions would be insensitive. People have the false impression that if you ask questions about obvious evidence, that you are somehow insulting the memory of those who we're lost. That's why false flag attacks usually have a hero story to go along with them. That way if you dare say anything, someone will end up punching you in the face screaming "don't you dare insult these heroes". Now if anyone on here is interested in actual evidence instead of caving to their feelings then please keep reading. There are a few different aspects of this case that fall right in line with a common false flag event:

1. Manufactured confusion - Obviously every single news agency has a completely different version of the story. One reporter says she spoke with the school nurse on the street (even though the nurse was in the school), another news source says the shooter was Ryan Lanza, and that his little brother was in custody for questioning. Nobody can tell us exactly what guns we're used and where they we're. Basically overall the whole thing is confusing, this makes the common viewer give up on getting the truth for themselves. Instead the common viewer subconsciously feels that maybe they just failed to keep up with the news properly, so they get into a mode where they assume the news will "catch them up", at this point they will accept anything.

2. Heroes - Once again we have heroes, even though every time I hear about a shooting in Camden, NJ, which is literally all the time, I can't remember the last time I heard of any heroes. The hero aspect like I said puts a thick shield over the conspiracy, because most people will rebuke you for even questioning it.

Now a few weeks ago, I was really confused as to why the news stations could not get their stories straight. So I decided to take things right to the horses mouth, and that horse is Lt. Paul Vance from CT State Police. I started communicating with him through email asking about the shooting. At first he was pretty cooperative, he did give me some details, but not much. He confirmed that the weapon in the trunk was a shotgun, he said the shooter killed himself with a handgun and that the victims we're killed by the AR-15. I then put up some of the transcript from the police radio communications where officers we're chasing down and apprehending additional suspects. At this point I have not narrowed down the exact number, but it is believed to be almost 6-7 suspects either apprehended or chased by police. After I put up that transcript and asked exactly where the handguns and AR-15 we're found, he ended the conversation. The reason why he ended the conversation is that he understands for one that he has the right to remain silent, and he also understands that any email from his office can be used against him in court. So instead of lying he simply chose to not say anything at all.

Moving forward, I started following a lead about alleged actors and stumbled onto a large collection of photos of the Greenberg family. I was able to recover and store over 1000 photos of this family and used them for analysis. I started with the Phelps family from Sandy Hook. It took only a couple of seconds to see that the Phelps are not who they say they are, they are Jennifer and Nick Greenberg. From that point I continued to look through the photos and noticed that one of their daughters was really familiar. Then I established another connection between Christina Taylor Green, who was an alleged victim of the 2011 shooting in Tuscon, AZ. I compared her photo to many Greenberg family photos and once again a dead match.

At this point I have brought a few experts into this through my company, because at this point I feel there is enough to launch an official investigation.

Here are the Phelps, as interviewed on CNN:


Here are a few images of the Greenbergs:

Those are just a few to get started, the Phelps are obviously the Greenbergs.

Christina Taylor Green (victim from 2011 Tuscon shooting):

As you can see, she is alive and well:

..and that is just the beginning. There are WAY more leads that are being followed from the Greenberg photo collection.

This photo of the Parker family was altered, this was confirmed by my photographer/graphic designer:

Download the above image and load it into your favorite image editor. Zoom in around Emilie Parker's head (girl to the far right). You will notice no strands of hair come off her head, also you can see smearing around her head. Her knee is cut off on the bottom right of the photo. There is no shadow on her arm as it's supposed to be somewhat behind her fathers arm.

For starters, post smaller images. You're messing up the page with the huge ones. Secondly, you need only post a couple to make your point.

All I want to speak to on the content is about Emilie Parker's pic. The photo is a professional family photo. The photographer likely did the Photoshopping himself to improve the look of the picture (stray hairs on her head). The shadow issue is not even an issue since the photographer likely had lighting from multiple directions. Look at her face, and you see her nose casts shadow on her right cheek, meaning the light source is coming from her left. Which would illuminate her arm even though is is behind her dad's because it is still to the left of his arm and therefore in the light coming from her left.
 
Upvote 0

guitarmonster

Newbie
Jan 5, 2012
268
9
✟22,958.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
In Relationship
All I want to speak to on the content is about Emilie Parker's pic. The photo is a professional family photo. The photographer likely did the Photoshopping himself to improve the look of the picture (stray hairs on her head). The shadow issue is not even an issue since the photographer likely had lighting from multiple directions. Look at her face, and you see her nose casts shadow on her right cheek, meaning the light source is coming from her left. Which would illuminate her arm even though is is behind her dad's because it is still to the left of his arm and therefore in the light coming from her left.

A professional photographer and graphic designer commented on this. There are multiple problems with the picture that indicate editing. Zoom in on the bottom right, you can see her knee is cut off, zoom in and it looks like part of the grass was clone stamped in a square shape. The blades of grass going over her fathers knee are cut right off as well. The edges around the girl are not consistent with the rest of the photo. There are no loose strands of hair around her head, and the edges are clearly blurred. There is no reason for a professional photographer to take a family portrait, then perform these edits which actually make the picture look worse. If this was really a professional photo, I certainly hope they got their money back.
 
Upvote 0
S

seeking Christ

Guest
Actually he's right about police investigation. They find one lie and they "put it to you."
If someone feels they have good cause to see the news deliberately falsifying their reports, they have every reason to be suspicious. Good on them for actually following through!

I don't see the photos here as convincing evidence of what's being claimed, not do I think a photo would count as positive ID in a court of law, but I'm hoping our poster here knows that already.

Do let us know what your own independent investigating turns up! I think the "hero"
aspect of the case is the best argument for school staff being armed, so I don't suspect
that part of being fake. Something weird is that statement that the shooter "went from class to class" shooting everyone in the class, but if 20 students died that's consistent
with ONE class. I've read the timeline and I don't think the Police got there quick enough
to actually stop him after killing everyone in only one classroom. That's not enough of an
inconsistency to make me think the whole thing was a hoax though.
 
Upvote 0

Jade Margery

Stranger in a strange land
Oct 29, 2008
3,018
311
✟27,415.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
In Relationship
It means something's awry. What that is exactly, is still up in the air at this point. Drawing the conclusion that she never existed is not what I'm doing. What I am saying is that photo-shopping, such as is clear below, indicates a lack of photos, or at least, a lack of photos when the news first came out. That could mean lots of things.

Here's the same photo that outlines the problem on the photo:

SOTOfail2.jpg

As a woman, a regular user of photoshop, and an artist who constantly studies human anatomy from both medical text books and instructions on human proportions and drawing the skeleton, I feel qualified to say that whoever originally drew these conclusions from this photo is an idiot of startling proportions.

I happen to be sitting in almost that exact pose right now, and I assure you it is possible. What you think is the continuation of her leg is actually her sweater bunched up over her hip. There's no cut away on her skirt, merely a highlight, and her finger is perfectly normal--you are mistaking a bit of shadow under her finger for a continuation of the finger itself.

Of course the rest of this thread is complete nonsense as well, but as this is actually one of my few areas of expertise, I thought I'd weigh in.
 
Upvote 0

pgp_protector

Noted strange person
Dec 17, 2003
51,885
17,790
57
Earth For Now
Visit site
✟456,951.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Others
As a woman, a regular user of photoshop, and an artist who constantly studies human anatomy from both medical text books and instructions on human proportions and drawing the skeleton, I feel qualified to say that whoever originally drew these conclusions from this photo is an idiot of startling proportions.

I happen to be sitting in almost that exact pose right now, and I assure you it is possible. What you think is the continuation of her leg is actually her sweater bunched up over her hip. There's no cut away on her skirt, merely a highlight, and her finger is perfectly normal--you are mistaking a bit of shadow under her finger for a continuation of the finger itself.

Of course the rest of this thread is complete nonsense as well, but as this is actually one of my few areas of expertise, I thought I'd weigh in.

So you're also on the payroll? ;)
(Wonders how I can get a job posting disinformation for the Illuminati)
 
Upvote 0

Skaloop

Agnostic atheist, pro-choice anti-abortion
May 10, 2006
16,332
899
48
Burnaby
Visit site
✟36,546.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-NDP
A professional photographer and graphic designer commented on this. There are multiple problems with the picture that indicate editing. Zoom in on the bottom right, you can see her knee is cut off, zoom in and it looks like part of the grass was clone stamped in a square shape. The blades of grass going over her fathers knee are cut right off as well. The edges around the girl are not consistent with the rest of the photo. There are no loose strands of hair around her head, and the edges are clearly blurred. There is no reason for a professional photographer to take a family portrait, then perform these edits which actually make the picture look worse. If this was really a professional photo, I certainly hope they got their money back.

That's my point; they were photoshopped out, which explains the blur around her head. I see nothing wrong with her knee. The grass at his knee isn't cut off, it's just not readily visible against her white shirt.

The fact that you need to zoom in on an already large photo to see these edits means that when printed and placed in an 8x10 frame, any blurring would not be visible. The picture would look fine.
 
Upvote 0

guitarmonster

Newbie
Jan 5, 2012
268
9
✟22,958.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
In Relationship
There are multiple major holes in this case, I am not just talking about the photos. Also there really isn't an independent investigation, there is just a really large amount of people in this country that are not buying it for what it is being presented to be. There is no question when you compare the photos that the Phelps are actually the Greenbergs. The Parker photo was altered, and there is no legitimate reason for this. The Parker photo alone does not indicate anything except for the fact that someone at some point felt the need to copy and paste Emilie into the photo. Every criminal case in history has had what you would call "unexplained evidence". There are always clues that are dug up that people are never able to make sense of. Attacking this by calling out a single photo doesn't really achieve anything. The photo only indicates that someone at some point had the motivation to portray information that was false. So when you look at the Parker photo, keep that in mind. The message I am trying to convey is that we are being lied to, people need to see that. Too many people are glued to that "idiot box" they call a television. I don't think there is one single person on mainstream tv that is honest, except for maybe Ben Swann. I think that it is kind of strange that all of a sudden we have these shootings where over and over again witnesses clearly state that they saw multiple shooters, but the police and media are strongly selling the lone gun theory. The Sikh Temple, Aurora Theater, Sandy Hook, Tucson... For crying out loud this is the same government that actually tried to sell the "magic bullet theory" after JFK was shot.

Really think hard and long about this. You one group of people stepping up with credible evidence, showing things clear as day with proper motive, intent, and ability. Another group who believe in "the magic bullet".

MAGIC BULLET
How is the world could anyone at all believe in a bullet that changes direction in air? So who are the real conspiracy theorists? In my mind, the mainstream media are the conspiracy nuts, their the ones falling all over each other and can't even get a single fact straight!
 
Upvote 0

Btodd

Well-Known Member
Oct 7, 2003
3,677
294
✟27,874.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
MAGIC BULLET
How is the world could anyone at all believe in a bullet that changes direction in air? So who are the real conspiracy theorists? In my mind, the mainstream media are the conspiracy nuts, their the ones falling all over each other and can't even get a single fact straight!

We'll see who can't get a single fact straight. Why don't you post a picture of JFK and Connelly's seating positions in the vehicle, for starters? The whole need for a 'magic bullet' is based on a very faulty premise. Garbage in, garbage out.

It also has nothing to do with the current conspiracy you're hawking.


Btodd
 
Upvote 0

guitarmonster

Newbie
Jan 5, 2012
268
9
✟22,958.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
In Relationship
It also has nothing to do with the current conspiracy you're hawking.

I never said that it did. It does however speak to the credibility of the government. No different than if someone was on trial, and an attorney goes after credibility in order to create doubt around their statements. For those who say we can just trust what the government tells us, I then ask should I trust in the magic bullet?

The problem right now is that there is more evidence of a coverup than there is of the actual event that is being portrayed. How do we even know that Adam Lanza was the shooter when a news source put this out:

Suspect in the Connecticut school shootings identified (video) | The Montgomery Advertiser | montgomeryadvertiser.com

This story has been removed, but is still in Google's cache. They will delete it soon just like they have been deleting other ones. Won't matter because there are servers actively archiving data so their attempts are useless.
 
Upvote 0

Btodd

Well-Known Member
Oct 7, 2003
3,677
294
✟27,874.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
For those who say we can just trust what the government tells us, I then ask should I trust in the magic bullet

No one suggested that you should 'just trust' what the government tells you, and the information about the Newtown shooting did not come from the government. It came from multiple sources.

Now, since you're again appealing to the magic bullet theory, please present why you think the shot fired by Oswald would require us to believe in a magic bullet. And when you do it, please post the seating positions of JFK and Connelly.

Just saying 'magic bullet' over and over again doesn't give any reasoning for the accusation.


Btodd

.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
S

seeking Christ

Guest
I How do we even know that Adam Lanza was the shooter when a news source put this out:

I didn't read the link but it goes to the report that it was Adam's older brother Ryan? He's a well-adjusted kid, who basically "knew" they actually wanted his little brother, just based on who he is. People were actually around Ryan to see the effect all this had on him.

People making mistakes would be a sign of authenticity more than anything else.
 
Upvote 0

guitarmonster

Newbie
Jan 5, 2012
268
9
✟22,958.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
In Relationship
I was simply making a point that people will buy just about anything, and that they are willing to sell us just about anything. The only way anyone can accept the "official" story on what happened at Sandy Hook is to throw out logic and just accept which ever story you get. I suppose it depends on what news agency you watch, since they all have different stories. I like how we have a reporter who talked to the school nurse out on the street even though the nurse was inside. Tons of video footage of multiple suspects being chased, and police scanner audio to confirm.

How about this at 7:57am before the shooting:
https://twitter.com/ljanyNT/status/279616136151183360

And this before the shooting as well:
https://twitter.com/matt_coyne/status/279635274944897024

Just look at this Google search. All I did was search for Sandy Hook School Support Fund, set the search by date range from December 1 to December 13 and sorted by date. Please explain to me exactly how there are cached results before the shooting? And keep in mind that I am president of a software company, so you can give me the deep down technical details of how Google's servers were running with their clocks out of whack while not causing conflicts with active directory and SSL authentication:

https://www.google.com/search?q=san...cdr:1,cd_min:12/1/2012,cd_max:12/13/2012&tbm=

Tell me, how much evidence do the people of this country need to finally realize what is going on?
 
Upvote 0