Like others have said, the wording of the question or how it was presented can skew results. Often polls will be devised to get a specific answer and then run with that statistic.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
To add to that, people will try to get the results they desire/were told to expect. I can't think of where I heard of it, but apparently there was a study involving the same survey questionnaire and two different groups. One group was told one number result to expect while the other was told a completely different result to expect. Both groups got the number's they expected.
LoAmmi said:Well, another technique I've heard about is basically to do questions leading up to the final question that you care about. If the entire survey was about rape, the victim, the legalities, and the consequences, the final questions of "Would you oppose an abortion in the case of rape?" becomes difficult for many to answer because they have been, in some way, emotionally compromised.
Our brains do weird things. Did you know what if you ask for gender at the beginning of a test, women are more likely to do worse on the test than if you ask for gender at the end of the test?
I thought it depended upon the subject because of cultural expectations (or more specifically, the belief in said cultural expectations).
I know that - I was the first to bring it up anyway. I just happen to disagree with it. (Y'all should read Multatuli's masterpiece "Max Havelaar", then you'd see why I brought up Barbertje because the church is behaving exactly like the judge in the Barbertje case.) "Do as we say, not because of any particular reason but only because we say so." Sorry, doesn't work for me....
I have no problem with good reasons, it's blind obedience that I have a problem with, and that's exactly what we're talking about here: people seem to be in hell solely for not having obeyed a command that is no longer binding to catholics. (Well, I know about the penance compensation, but for brevity let's state it this way.)And THAT is exactly the opposite of what the Church says. The Church always has a purpose and a reason for doctrine, it is for the betterment of society and her people.
Thank you for your concern, but the reason why I am no longer catholic is not that I don't know enough about catholic doctrine. That's a cliché that I've heard over and over and over again here in OBOB, ad nauseum. The more I learn, the less catholic I become.Which explains why your posts are not in line with this forum. I believe you are not as informed on Catholic doctrine as you think, so stay with this site and learn.
I was turning off the TV last night when I happened to catch Juan Williams tell folks that Gallup Poll says that 75% of Catholics think that abortion is okay and that they don't have to believe in that old fashioned Vatican. Times change. It's like not eating fish on Friday. Once it was wrong. But now it's okay. What?
Since when do Catholics think abortion is okay? You can't be Catholic and believe abortion is not immoral. It's a tenet of the faith. Procuring (and supporting) abortion carries an automatic excommunication. And why be Catholic in the first place if one doesn't intend to follow the dictates of the Bishop of Rome?
Is this what non-Catholics really believe about us? No wonder Obama is confused.
Acts 9:4-5God isn't the church.
Yes, we already covered that, thank you.Acts 9:4-5
He fell to the ground and heard a voice say to him, Saul, Saul, why do you persecute me?
Who are you, Lord? Saul asked.
I am Jesus, whom you are persecuting, he replied.
Jesus (God) and His Church cannot be separated.
I don't have time to look up those verses so please give them to me.
And look at my religious icon.
I find it ridiculous that one would be in hell for eating meat on a Friday and another person wouldn't, just because they were born 50 years apart. It's either a sin or it isn't.
Hm, Hosea's child is here... but where are Lo-Ruhama and Jezreel?
I like the screen-name; Hosea's one of my favorite books.
I like the name because it holds the promise of the return of the Northern Kingdom from exile.
Off topic--I like Hosea too. Hear the hymn we have?