Former Navy SEAL Launches PAC To Fight Obama

[TScott]

I especially like what he says here:

"For those who have taken an oath to defend the Constitution against all enemies, both foreign and domestic, it is a call of duty to take back America from a Commander-in-Chief that is incapable of understanding the sacrifices that have been made for the values that have made America great"

Why do you like it?
He's not saying anything.
There is no substance here, no specifics.
Just a bunch of meaningless innuendo.

I love how people like this think that just because they are an ex-Navy Seal that this gives them some kind of moral authority. Well, I'll tell you what it absolutely DOES NOT!

 

[TScott]

Plenty of DEmocrats understand the sacrifice since some of them have experienced the sacrifice. Obama has a different vision of America, a country I doubt he considers worthy of said sacrifice. Recall that he considers America to be derisive and promised to fundamentally change America.

Thats not true, he's never shown or said any of those things since he has been POTUS.

 

[TScott]

Besides, Liberals traditionally loath military service anyway...

You don't know what you are talking about.

I find that personally insulting. Liberals have traditionally served their country with distinction.

 

[TScott]

He is saying Obama is incapable because he is an enemy from within , a usurper working for the NWO to destroy America that is why he used the term to defend the constitution from both foreign and DOMESTIC.

So what did he do? Turn in his black beret for a tin foil hat? The guy sounds more and more like Timothy McVeigh.

 

[TScott]

You know I read that book about Kerry's four month service in Vietnam. He deserved to be swift-boated, and still does.

It was bunk. The people who actually served with Kerry, on his boat thought the world of him. The others didn't like Kerry's anti war stance when he got out so they made up a bunch of unsupported lies to try to discredit him.

Bottom line is Kerry was put in harms way, and served under fire. We never used to criticize our vets for doing that. Not until the neo-cons came along.

 

[MachZer0]

Yet he supports a candidate that supported the war in Vietman so much that he that got 4 deferments.

Not sure what that has to do with anything

 

[MachZer0]

Where do I contribute?

There was a link in the article I provided.

 

[MachZer0]

Yes, that would be correct. See the "Birther" controversy which has little grounding in "fact" yet keeps coming up repeatedly. Or see the hue and cry over Obamacare despite the fact that it has now made it all the way through the Supreme Court. Or see the "teleprompter" meme that has circled the drain for 4 straight years now. Or see the manifold conspiracies we hear on this board alone all day everyday! And most of them are for things that Bush himself OK'd when he was in office, but if Obama signs on, suddenly it's baaaaaaad.

Yes, the loyal opposition started in with Obama the very second he raised that hand to swear his oath and it has never, ever stopped for some.

(I am not saying you can't find reasons to dislike Obama, and I'm sure yours are well constructed, but in general there are those out there for whom Obama couldn't do or say anything "good" ever.)

Part of that has no relevance and the other part ignores the realities of Obama's goal of fundamentally changing America

 

[MachZer0]

And when that happens the GOP Swiftboats 'em!

Yeah!

If they are turncoats like John Kerry, the truth needs to be told.

 

[MachZer0]

Why do you like it?
He's not saying anything.
There is no substance here, no specifics.
Just a bunch of meaningless innuendo.

I love how people like this think that just because they are an ex-Navy Seal that this gives them some kind of moral authority. Well, I'll tell you what it absolutely DOES NOT!

Too bad you didn't follow the link to the PAC so you could read the specifics. The link from my OP wasn't written by him but rather about him so he did not have control over what specifics were provided.

 

[MachZer0]

Thats not true, he's never shown or said any of those things since he has been POTUS.

Did I say anything about what he has said after becoming POTUS? Nope.

 

[TLK Valentine]

Obama sucks but romney isn't too much better :/

Depends on which way the wind is blowing -- They used to be practically identical.

 

[TLK Valentine]

Why do you like it?
He's not saying anything.
There is no substance here, no specifics.
Just a bunch of meaningless innuendo.

That's why he likes it.

 

[MachZer0]

It was bunk. The people who actually served with Kerry, on his boat thought the world of him. The others didn't like Kerry's anti war stance when he got out so they made up a bunch of unsupported lies to try to discredit him.

Bottom line is Kerry was put in harms way, and served under fire. We never used to criticize our vets for doing that. Not until the neo-cons came along.

You didn't read the book did you?

 

[BleedingHeart]

You don't know what you are talking about.

I find that personally insulting. Liberals have traditionally served their country with distinction.

Don't be too insulted. It's much easier for people to broad brush those they disagree with then actually look at any facts.

 

[Azadok2day]

So what did he do? Turn in his black beret for a tin foil hat? The guy sounds more and more like Timothy McVeigh.

You have no clue the sacrifice it takes to be a Navy Seal , if you did you would not make such an assinine statement .

 

[TeddyReceptus]

Besides, Liberals traditionally loath military service anyway, or at least accord it no respect and of little or no value. Defense department jobs are the only government jobs they are in favor of eliminating. Unless lack of military service can be used to discredit someone, traditionally liberals don't care about it.

May I remind you of the SWIFTBOAT ad which the Right took out against Kerry in 2004?

That was an appalling case where people on the right actively denigrated a PURPLE HEART RECIPIENT!

Spare us your "opinion" of what liberals loathe or don't loathe. Your point stands vacant.

Thanks!

 

[TeddyReceptus]

You know I read that book about Kerry's four month service in Vietnam. He deserved to be swift-boated, and still does.

Hmmm, interesting! So 'respectful' of you.

Your point now stands as hypocritical.

 

[MachZer0]

May I remind you of the SWIFTBOAT ad which the Right took out against Kerry in 2004?

That was an appalling case where people on the right actively denigrated a PURPLE HEART RECIPIENT!

Spare us your "opinion" of what liberals loathe or don't loathe. Your point stands vacant.

Thanks!

Purple Hearts in Vietnam were a dime a dozen, given out too freely in my view. Kerry is the perfect example.

 

[TLK Valentine]

You have no clue the sacrifice it takes to be a Navy Seal , if you did you would not make such an assinine statement .

And some of them crack under the strain -- there's no shame in that.