Shabbath Shalume.
All praises and honor to YAHWEH The Almighty God for creating fishes, birds, animals, and mankind separately.
Demonstrate said limit and define kind please.
I already demonstrated said limit. I repeat it again for example:
A fish can never evolve into a frog
A bird can never evolve into a horse.
An ape can never evolve into a man.
In fact neither kind can never evolve into another kind of animal or man.
In defining kind, some refer to the study of Baraminology. Whatever classification man choose to from Kingdom down to Species, I will leave that up to your choosing. However, I will say that in addition to the above examples, all biological creations do not have a common ancestor according God's creation in the book of Genesis, chapter 1.
This isn't the standard you know. Some animals have barely evolved in the past few million years (The horseshoe crab comes to mind). Others have changed in a human lifetime. The process of one species evolving into a new one is called "Speciation" and we have many recorded instances. Simply by typing in "Observed instances of speciation" in your search engine of choice will give you a few examples.
COMMENT: Regardless of the standard, my point is that no matter how long the length of time you choose, one kind will never evolve into another kind; that is, a fish into a frog, a lizard into an alligator, or an ape into a man (to name a few). There is no scientifc evidence that the horseshoe crab evolved into anything millions of years ago.
Excellent example. Give a better one, if you're able. The point is, not all life evolved from one species.
I propose to you the exact opposite and cite 150 years worth of research contradicting you.
Oh, you will not be contradicting me, but God. He (not I) made them on different days; I'm just the messenger that echoed what was written in Genesis, chapter 1. None of the 150 years of research in which you purport shows any breaking limits to evolve from one kind to another. Let me give you some examples of kinds from a biblical point of view:
man, birds, fish, horses, lions, giraffes, elephants, lizards, whales, dolphins, cats, dogs, flies, bees, ants, germs, trees.
In the beginning, God created each of the above creatures separately, and they neither had a common ancestor nor did each of the above kinds evolved from each other. Man's 150 plus research neither produced any evidence showing a common ancestors of these examples nor any crossovers of the same. They in fact require you to accept their theories on faith.
Evidence suggests this happened my good sir.
The fact is, evolutionist have yet to prove any evidence that all biological life has a common ancestor other than God. Their only evidence is faith in billions of years of chance. And repetition of unproving so-called evidence doesn't cut it either.
I'd reply but I still need that definition of kind.
You're not going to get a better example of kind other than the one that I have just described. But whatever classification you choose, my arguement is that they are not ALL related according to God. The burden of proof is upon the evolutionists to scientifically prove that all biological life had a common ancestor or are related to each other biologically.
I'm dying to hear about this new boundary that's eluded millions of researchers over 150 years.
And you will continue be dying because the boundary is mentioned in the Holy Bible, Genesis 1. And I seriously doubt that there are millions of researchers here on earth. Furthermore, their 150 years of research has yet to prove any scientific connection other than beautiful charts and faith in billions of years of
unprovable chance.
Shabbath Shalume.
