I don't know what you mean. Adventists do not keep any OT laws. While the Ten Commandments were given in the OT time, they are New Covenant laws. They transcend the Old Covenant, as they were given before the ratification of the Old Covenant. The Sabbath, and all the OT laws were in force before the OT existed, and they are intrinsically tied to the Everlasting Covenant which encompasses all the covenants. It is the covenant between the Father and the Son. The only laws that were done away with at the cross were the ceremonial laws---circumcision, priesthood, sacrifices, festivals, shadow sabbaths (there were 11 of them--not associated with the 4th Commandment Sabbath of Creation--which was the "Sabbath of the Lord", not "her sabbaths", meaning "Israel's sabbaths"), meat offerings, drink offerings, etc. All that was done away with. Not the Ten Commandments which resided in the Ark of the Covenant. These stand fast forever and ever, and are done in truth and uprightness.
The Ten Commandments are not the laws of Moses. Read 2 Corinthians 3, and you will see what it means to be in the Spirit. The Spirit is where the law is written in the heart by the Holy Spirit, and you obey otu of love, not out of your own selves.
Notice that Paul quotes from the second table of the Ten Commandments:
Owe no man any thing, but to love one another: for he that loveth another hath fulfilled the law. For this, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not kill, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Thou shalt not covet; and if [there be] any other commandment, it is briefly comprehended in this saying, namely, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. Love worketh no ill to his neighbour: therefore love [is] the fulfilling of the law.
Are only laws that Paul does not quote ones that you say are not "OT" laws? You know that even the commandment to love your neighbor and love God are also "OT" laws? Check out Leviticus 19:18; Deut 6:5.
I guess we better not keep these laws Harry, because these laws were also OT laws.
Scriptures are very clear that the Sabbath is also in force in the New Covenant. See Matthew 24:20; Luke 23:56; Acts 13:42-44; 16:13; 17:2; 18:4.
Isaiah 66:22,23 tells us that all flesh will be worshiping God from one Sabbath to another, and from one month to another.
This is way after the New Covenant.
It is only a matter of simple logic. If the Sabbath was instituted in the Old Creation, and it will be kept after the New Creation, then wouldn't you think we keep the Sabbath in between, in honor of the Old Creation, and as a memorial pointing forward to the New Creation?
Most certainly.
Also, the words in Psalms are too clear:
"The works of his hands are verity and judgment; all his commandments are sure. They STAND FAST FOR EVER AND EVER, and are done in truth and uprightness. He sent redemption unto his people: he hath commanded his covenant for ever: holy and reverend is his name. The fear of the LORD is the beginning of wisdom: a good understanding have all they that do his commandments: his praise endureth for ever." (Psalms 111:7-10)
You can't get around the clear language. This covenant that is "for ever" is talking about the Everlasting Covenant, and God's commandments, which are the very original Ten in heaven, were given as a copy to Moses, but have always existed.
The Ten Commandments are NOT THE LAWS OF MOSES.
They are the Laws of God!
And I'll prove it to you:
It seems quite obvious that one would effectively do away with the Ten Commandments by mingling them with ninety or a hundred others and calling them ordinances instead of commandments. Such a radical effort has been made to dilute the force of the only words of the Bible which God wrote with His own hand. Furthermore, the claim has been advanced that since the Ten Commandments were a part of the mosaic law of ordinances which ended at the cross, we are no more obligated to obey the decalogue than we are to offer lambs in sacrifice.
Is there proof positive in the Scriptures that there was no such blending of the ceremonial and moral law into one? Can it be shown that the Ten Commandments were of a permanent, perpetual nature while the ceremonial law of statutes and ordinances came to an end when Jesus died? Indeed there is abundance of evidence to answer these questions with a resounding yes!
God made known this distinction to His servant Moses, and Moses explained it to the people at Mt. Horeb.
And he declared unto you his covenant, which he commanded you to perform, even ten commandments; and he wrote them upon two tables of stone. And the Lord commanded me at that time to teach you statutes and judgments, that ye might do them in the land whither ye go over to possess it (Deuteronomy 4:13, 14).
Please notice how Moses clearly separated the Ten Commandments, which he commanded you, from the statutes which he commanded me to give the people. The big question now is whether those statutes and judgments, which Moses passed on to the people, were designated as a separate and distinct law.
God answers that important question in such a way that no doubt can remain.
Neither will I make the feet of Israel move any more out of the land which I gave their fathers; only if they will observe to do according to all that I have commanded them and according to all the law that my servant Moses commanded them (2 Kings 21:8).
Here we are assured that the statutes which Moses gave the people were called a law. Any child can discern that two different laws are being described. God speaks of the law I commanded and also the law ... Moses commanded. Unless this truth is understood properly, limitless confusion will result.
Daniel was inspired to make the same careful distinction when he prayed for the desolated sanctuary of his scattered nation.
Yea, all Israel have transgressed thy law, even by departing, that they might not obey thy voice; therefore the curse is poured upon us, and the oath that is written in the law of Moses the servant of God, because we have sinned against him (Daniel 9:11).
Once more we see thy law and the law of Moses, and this time the two are recognized as different in content. There are no curses recorded in the Ten Commandments that God wrote, but the law which Moses wrote contained an abundance of such curses and judgments.
The major point of difference between the law of God and the law of Moses, though, lies in the way they were recorded and preserved. We have already cited Moses statement that God wrote them (the Ten Commandments) upon two tables of stone (Deuteronomy 4:13). Compare that with Exodus 31:18, two tables of testimony, tables of stone, written with the finger of God.
No one can confuse this writing with the way the mosaic law was produced. And Moses wrote this law ... And it came to pass, when Moses had made an end of writing the words of this law in a book, until they were finished, That Moses commanded the Levites, which bare the ark of the covenant of the Lord, saying, Take this book of the law, and put it in the side of the ark of the covenant of the Lord your God, that it may be there for a witness against thee (Deuteronomy 31:9, 24-26). This book of statutes and judgments which Moses wrote in a book was placed in a pocket on the side of the ark. In contrast, the law written by God on tables of stone was placed inside the ark of the covenant. And thou shalt put into the ark the testimony which I shall give thee (Exodus 25:16).
At this point we can note several distinctions in the two laws. They had different authors, were written on different material, were placed in different locations and had totally different content.
In closing....
There is only one time that God ever spoke His law with His lips in an audible format to all of God's people at one time. And the only law God ever spoke with His lips to the people was the Ten Commandments at Mount Sinai. See Exodus 20 and Dueteronomy 5.
This is the covenant which He spoke from His own lips.
What does God say concerning this covenant?
"My covenant will I not break, nor alter the thing that is gone out of my lips." (Psalms 89:34)
There! It's final!
There is really only ONE covenant. That is, the Everlasting Covenant which began at Creation.
How is it possible to say that when Christ died on the Cross, it was the blood of the New Covenant, yet in Hebrews 13:20, Jesus' blood was the "blood of the Everlasting Covenant"?
Didn't the Everlasting Covenant begin way back in Genesis 9:16, long before the Old Covenant was ratified?
In a nutshell, I believe the following sums up how to look at this "covenants" perplexity. How can there be so many covenants, yet only one covenant at the same time?
The answer to this is that the Old Covenant originally given at Sinai was the Everlasting Covenant broken by the poor promises of Israel, which rested in their own merits, and not the merits of the Lord working in and through them. The New Covenant was the Everlasting Covenant recaptured, restored, and made better by the blood of Christ. This is why in Daniel 9:27, we are told that "he", meaning Christ, "made strong the covenant with many for 1 week". In other words, during the last week of the 70 weeks, from A.D. 27 to A.D. 34, Christ "strengthened" the Everlasting Covenant with God's people by introducing a New Covenant.
(Continued...)